We are a group of Right-Wing advocates of freedom and individual liberty, the right to life, right to own and carry firearms, freespeech, net neutrality, individual rights, constitutional republic government, separation of church and state, limited government, anti-globalist, freedom of association, property rights, the free market, mandating transparency, preservation of western culture, Christianity and the European people against feminism, Islam, marxism and political correctness. For those on Mod DB if you're a conservative, libertarian, traditionalist, reactionary, Christian, Orthodox, nationalist or New Right, for US, Australia, New Zealand, Canada or European nations join us to help defeat progressives.

Add media Report RSS The best run states in the US. (view original)
The best run states in the US.
embed
share
view previous next
Share Image
Share on Facebook Post Email a friend
Embed Image
Post comment Comments
TheUnbeholden Creator
TheUnbeholden - - 3,607 comments

Not to mention the Socialist state of Sweden has apparently not as high living standards as people say it does. After taxes (Sweden's 55% income tax) and welfare benefits Sweden's median income is $27'167 which if it was to become a state in the US it would be one of the poorest states.

"These national-level comparisons take into account taxes, and include social benefits (e.g., "welfare" and state-subsidized health care) as income".

"Once purchasing power among the US states is taken into account, we find that Sweden's median income ($27,167) is higher than only six states: Arkansas ($26,804), Louisiana ($25,643), Mississippi ($26,517), New Mexico ($26,762), New York ($26,152) and North Carolina ($26,819)."

"calculate real incomes based on the cost of living in each state... find real purchasing power"

Mises.org
Bullshitexposed.com

Next time people who say that Sweden is so great, the only part of Sweden that is great is what wealth they managed to hang on to before it become a big socialist country after 1950. The golden years of Sweden's growth was when it was relatively free market between 1890-1950, that also is the only time that the poverty rate was dropping.

The general trend is more government spending does not reduce poverty, only sustained economic growth does:
Cato.org

welfare:
Usgovernmentspending.com

Compare the data of Public Spending & Wealth Growth according to OECD data
(1960-1996) pretty shows you that govt's don't bring people out of poverty & prevent its reduction.

Check out OECD.stat & Danieljmitchell.files.wordpress.com

Reply Good karma+4 votes
Post a comment

Your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community. Or sign in with your social account:

Description