大家好!I come from East Asia. My favourites are: Lolita fashion - Seafoods - Railroads - Command & Conquer universe - Films about aerospace - Stuffed animal toys - Animes and so on. (Please forgive my poor English) 西木头永远的神,虚渊玄老师永远的神。

Report RSS Didn't expect me to be like this? But it's also good!

Posted by on

file

file 1

Post comment Comments
DoDoCat
DoDoCat - - 1,754 comments

国际主义万岁

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
chenfan7810 Author
chenfan7810 - - 198 comments

Of course, I do not meet the definition of "left" in the domestic political circle. Domestic key political circles believe that the "left" must oppose the market law and wage labor at the same time, but I am not disgusted with the market law, because the national planned economy can not liberate the productive forces, but can not meet the people's personalized consumption needs. In fact, what I most oppose is wage labor, or all hierarchies in the workplace. Whether such wage labor comes from state-owned enterprises or private enterprises, it is essentially the exploitation and oppression of workers. But the former is the exploitation of state capitalism and the latter is the exploitation of free capitalism.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
DoDoCat
DoDoCat - - 1,754 comments

The market cannot be cancelled. There is a market where there is a transaction. Forcibly canceling the market is not in line with the economic strategy, and Marx did not say that a planned economy should be implemented. Marx just felt that the behavior of capitalists in a capitalist society was not constrained, that is, the "anarchy of the capital market", but later practitioners believed that the plan was The economy is more in line with Marx's thinking, but in fact the planned economy has not succeeded. In fact, modern European and American countries are already half close to socialism, with high welfare policies.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
chenfan7810 Author
chenfan7810 - - 198 comments

The reason why I was expelled from the domestic key political circles was because I did not support the planned economy and one party autocracy. I just said a few good words on behalf of Kautsky, Trotsky and Rosa Luxemburg. Before I mentioned the Austrian school, I was denounced as a revisionist by the key political left. But I also said a lot of words in support of Lenin, and they directly and selectively ignored it. Later, I found that the domestic key political circle didn't want equal communication at all, just to refute each other and appear to be very clever.

In that case, as a believer of Robespierre, I'd better send them to the guillotine, hahaha.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
chenfan7810 Author
chenfan7810 - - 198 comments

Many of the rules of the game formulated by Stalin and his followers are not based on classical Marxism, but on his own understanding of Lenin's works. For example, Lenin did not require Russia to implement a one party system, as evidenced by the continued participation of the Mensheviks in the Supreme Soviet after the October Revolution. But Stalin took it out of context in some ways. Of course, I can't unilaterally say that Stalin was selfish, but in fact, most of the Supreme Soviet representatives of the Soviet Union were not elected by the people, and there has been a serious deviation from the orthodox socialist theory. Finally, the Bolsheviks became the new ruling class, so they were called "state capitalism" by other socialist schools outside the Soviet Union. But I don't think Stalin thought of this when he was alive.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
DoDoCat
DoDoCat - - 1,754 comments

Well, I can only say that socialist theory is still in an imperfect stage. The current mainstream socialist model is basically based on the Soviet system, which is the so-called "Soviet-style socialist system." The socialist line is the inevitable trend of the future world (if the world wants to become better). The capitalist system has been proved to be a cannibalistic line, with problems such as inequality between the rich and the poor and the consolidation of classes. In fact, the future socialist line has appeared on the horizon. It is a new type of social governance system centered on the community. It is different from the capitalist line and the Soviet-style socialist line. However, this line is not yet mature and in its infancy. In the embryonic stage, there is such a tendency in some areas, but it is not obvious yet.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
chenfan7810 Author
chenfan7810 - - 198 comments

And there is one missing item in this test, about "punitive justice" and "restorative justice". I have always opposed restorative justice and advocated punitive justice, because in my heart, "controlling violence with violence" is the most efficient way to solve social problems. Hee hee hee.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
DoDoCat
DoDoCat - - 1,754 comments

There is nothing wrong with this, you should be resolute and decisive when dealing with the wicked. The current judicial system treats murderers who commit murders too benevolent, and those who have clear evidence should be directly sentenced to death to demonstrate social justice.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Post a comment

Your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community. Or sign in with your social account: