For everyone that likes Warhammer 40k Tabletop and Dawn of War Games or anything to do with Warhammer 40K.
that date... -_-
That can't posibly be correct. I guess the creators of this game weren't really that knowladgable with Warhammer 40k dating.
wow i had never noticed that before. lol how can you be 2000 years into a millenium
I'm not saying this is an imposible date I'm saying this date can't be right since the current Warhammer date is like 120,000.M41 so this date can't be right. The events of Fire Warrior aren't that old.
The current 40k date is 999.M41.
Unless the 2002 part is the Tau date rather than the date on the imperial calender, aren't Tau years like Dog years?
The current date of Warhammer 40,000 is 999.M41 when the date changes it would become 001.M42. So that date there can't be correct.
The current date of Warhammer 40,000 is 999.M41 (if the date changes it would become 000.M42) So that date there can't be correct.
that was what i ment to say with the post that was deleted...
which was now edited back in... lol
The problem was solved.
Your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community. Or sign in with your social account:
Ethereal Ko'vash greets the Tau on an outpost world.
that date... -_-
That can't posibly be correct. I guess the creators of this game weren't really that knowladgable with Warhammer 40k dating.
wow i had never noticed that before. lol how can you be 2000 years into a millenium
I'm not saying this is an imposible date I'm saying this date can't be right since the current Warhammer date is like 120,000.M41 so this date can't be right. The events of Fire Warrior aren't that old.
The current 40k date is 999.M41.
Unless the 2002 part is the Tau date rather than the date on the imperial calender, aren't Tau years like Dog years?
The current date of Warhammer 40,000 is 999.M41 when the date changes it would become 001.M42.
So that date there can't be correct.
The current date of Warhammer 40,000 is 999.M41 (if the date changes it would become 000.M42)
So that date there can't be correct.
that was what i ment to say with the post that was deleted...
which was now edited back in... lol
The problem was solved.