Computer Constructors
Hardware & Tech
For anyone who is, plans to or already has made a computer. Here you can share tips, info and the progress of your custom builds.
SSD Benchmark
(view original)
Post a comment
Description
It looks like the agility 3 is with compressed data alot faster.
The fault is the asynchron memory -_- but yeah it's still fast enough for me :D
alot faster :)
Fast enough, that just destroyed mine!?!
And yea, my drive shares the same memory type which is a limiting factor, how did you get your results so much better?
btw just set the benchmark to 0 not 1 in crystaldiskmark so you can see how it can handle it.
0 = compressed data (mp3 etc...)
1 = uncompressed data (big files)
default is 1 but 1 is only usefull for big data (etc when you copy al ot big files 1gb+)
0 is good to see how the SSD handle the other side of files
SSD with asynchron memory are not that fast with uncompressed data, but they handle compressed very well ;)
It looks like the Agility 3 can catch up a Vertex 3 with compressed files :D
I noticed also that my cable was a SATA III so the SSD is working on full power.
The speeda you got are dead-on with real workd speeds, you will never reach whats on the box, as they are "Perfect Scenario" results using the exact data compression and size that the drive likes...
I'm surprised you even got that close :)
I got a lucky drive :)
Be carefull, I have heard the OCZ drives have I high failure rate, been to a lot of forums where they have just died...
I will give you a note when it happen ;)
But it looks like I had alot of luck with hardware.
My Q6600 was awesome at OC, also my HD 6870 is running at 1Ghz stable :D
My HDDs are both 5 years old and running still awesome with good health.
Awesome!