Dante's Inferno wallpapers in one single archive. (1920x1200, 1680x1050, 1600x1200, 1600x900, 1440x900/1440x960, 1280x960, 1280x800, 1280x720, 1040x780...
Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.
Perhaps one of the best games on earth graphic-wise. I'm a bit disappointed as it strays wayyyyyyyyyy too far off the storyline of the actual poem (Dante's Inferno/The Divine Comedy). Definitley a good game, but not for the faint of heart.
well . . . i hope there would have been a PC version too . . .
Indeed. Would be really fun playing this on PC, I hope they will conver it soon.
But I guess Visceral games have abandoned PC, since we don't even know if Dead Space 2 is coming to PC - if it's not, I will be angry :S
Wikipedia can be edited by anyone. This makes it very unreliable. That particular article is semi-protected. I don't feel like creating an account and dragging this out for 4 days to prove to you how unreliable it is.
Oh man, you can only try and that you do Feillyne. ;)
I've been following this game ( being that " The Divine Comedy " is one of my favorite literary works of all time ) and I'm dismayed that I'm going to have to wait for a future PC platform release. Not to mention it's amusing to follow the games " religious oppositions " outcries. It never stops...
Well I do appreciate the video's you've posted and enjoyed watching. Oh and for myself, Google's got nothin' on Wiki for established info. Keep up the the good work man.
Thanks.
Yeah, and I guess I will be waiting for a PC release, too. At least I'll think about the buy when I see some more info & vids on the game editor. ;-)
Why would I want to look into it? Why not just post the information on this page instead of making people go look for it? Wikipedia isn't very reliable, so I am not going to look up something on it.
The hurfdurffery continues
Of course it isn't, especially with footnotes.
More reliable are news from sites that don't reference ANY SOURCES at all. Sorry to disappoint you.
Everything that is properly commented, and what contains sources, is reliable. Who told you Wikipedia isn't? It depends on a particular article.
Give me the link to the wikipedia and I will show you how unreliable it is.
En.wikipedia.org
Tackle that. Only 84 footnotes. I wish you a nice read.