Description

A small addon focused on re-texturing the foliage of most, if not all, vanilla trees and bushes.

Preview
Retextured Trees
Post comment Comments
Gattobuono
Gattobuono - - 646 comments

Good work!

Reply Good karma Bad karma+4 votes
Sooryan_101
Sooryan_101 - - 447 comments

Such a neat little addon. Thanks

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Fast&FPS
Fast&FPS - - 2,218 comments

Hell yeah HD tree

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
BF2all
BF2all - - 1,144 comments

Cool work man, thx

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Guest
Guest - - 690,470 comments

Are you sure vanilla saved them in DXT5? I dont think so, they are DXT1 already in vanilla. Which means, your new 2048x2048 textures use a lot more VRAM than before.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
-Fl4m3s- Author
-Fl4m3s- - - 5 comments

Yes, foliage textures, AFAIK, were saved as DXT5. The game does have many textures saved as DXT1 however (tree barks for example which use less memory than foliage at the same pixel count on vanilla and get almost exactly 4X more demanding when scaled by 2X on each dimension and saved as DXT1), but i'm fairly sure those i altered were mostly DXT5 on vanilla.

Otherwise it wouldn't make sense that textures with 4X the base size were only consuming around 2.5X to 3X the space on both VRAM and storage if they were saved with the same compression format and ratio as vanilla.

Those textures as DXT1 also show some minor artifacting around the edges far away when playing at lower screen resolutions, but those are mostly gone when saved on DXT5 (not enough of an issue for me to consider saving them as DXT5, which then get closer to 4X the requirements compared to the original).

Unless the tools i'm using somehow compress them better, i don't think they were DXT1 originally. Still, not guaranteeing everything was DXT5 before, i didn't check those base textures all that in-depth, just noticed the new DXT1 textures weren't taking up as many resources as i expected them to.

Reply Good karma+3 votes
Guest
Guest - - 690,470 comments

ok, thank U

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
cataly63
cataly63 - - 244 comments

Excellent !! Thanks

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
Dukern
Dukern - - 259 comments

Very good job. 10/10

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Post a comment

Your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community. Or sign in with your social account: