The End Of Days is a “c&c Generals Zero Hour” total conversion. It brings to the main game a new faction - Russia, with new units, special powers, abilities and upgrades. Other factions are completely redone with better detailed models and new abilities special powers and upgrades. The mod changes the main game play by making it more realistic and fun. To real war feeling! Current version is 0.95 Beta. It is not a final version of the mod. Playable factions are USA, GLA, CHINA and RUSSIA

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
Add media RSS US M-60 Sabra (view original)
US M-60 Sabra
embed
share
view previous next
Share Image
Share on Facebook Tweet Email a friend
Embed Image
Comments
Damfoos
Damfoos

Baby Crusader

Reply Good karma Bad karma+11 votes
Alexei_Stukov Author
Alexei_Stukov

Yea, but it is a real tank :)

Reply Good karma+10 votes
EA.GLE
EA.GLE

(buried)

It is wrong idea. USA fraction is represent high-tech actor in CaC Generals.
M60 is not good choice for USA.
M60 maybe good for GLA.
New light tank is not better than Stryker MGS.
It is completely wrong way!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply Good karma Bad karma-27 votes
Alexei_Stukov Author
Alexei_Stukov

When you gonna realize that you can not tell me what to do?

Reply Good karma+28 votes
AlliedGuardianTank
AlliedGuardianTank

ever heard of the humvee? It is not appropriate for US, but IT MATCHES

Reply Good karma Bad karma+5 votes
Kodasa
Kodasa

The Humvee is appropriate for the US. They currently use them today, and considering this is a more realistic interpretation of generals, which was actually set in 2015 funnily enough. When it came out, generals was set in the "near future" now it takes place in the past.

So yea the humvee is appropriate and it matches.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+5 votes
rkraptor70
rkraptor70

He was probably referring to the fact that the Humvee's are as old as the M-60.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Kodasa
Kodasa

Potentially. But unlike the M60, the humvee is actually still in service. Despite it's age.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Alexei_Stukov Author
Alexei_Stukov

We use humvees in the game, so ?

Reply Good karma+2 votes
Kodasa
Kodasa

Was advocating for the humvee mate, not against it.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
TypicalRussianIvan
TypicalRussianIvan

I don't give a **** about the solid arguments, but as long as American games show Russia with stone-age modifications of T-72 and AK-47 you have no right to complain, because I say so.
That's right, every thread should have aggressive Russian guy, this one didn't, now it does.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+5 votes
EA.GLE
EA.GLE

(buried)

so, Are you Communist stupid man with stupid opinion?
This is real.

AK-74 and T-72 is old scrap for undeveloped Russia or GLA
M60 is not in USarmy duty

Reply Good karma Bad karma-11 votes
TypicalRussianIvan
TypicalRussianIvan

No, I'm smart Capitalist man with smart opinion

>2016
>'Murica can't into 5th generation vehicles
>Created F-35
>>>>Using Paladins with the stone-age reloading system
>Not having an automatic reloading system which even the oldest T-72 has
>Implying that America is deverloped
But you are right, clumsy Pzkpfw I Abrams metal box would be more appropriate than glorious M-60.

Boy, you gonna be so disappointed when you find out that I'm not even Russian and not even from Russia.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+6 votes
EA.GLE
EA.GLE

(buried)

M1 haven got automatic reloading system because M1 do not need it.

Why? M1 have special fire control and lock on system with first round shot to hit to target until 1980.
M1 have DU armor with uranium- heavy weigh and heavy armor, but speed is good 70 km/h

T72 don't have thermal sensor for good operation in night in this day.

T72 haven't got armory bunker for munitions as M1 Abrams.
Munitions is around the crews in t72 tank.
T72 have nick name a deadly bed.

Do you understand word military vehicle?

Reply Good karma Bad karma-8 votes
TypicalRussianIvan
TypicalRussianIvan

M1 doesn't need it, you say?
That's probably the reason latest modifications have finally been equipped with automatic loader and not "afroamerican-loader-guy".

I perfectly know that T-72 is a metal coffin. And that's why exactly Russia uses T-90 with all possible active and dynamic defense systems which have proven themselves good in Syria. Better than basic ork thick armor making tank perfect for urban warfare and useles in the open-field warfare. You yourself have just explained why putting T-72 in games is dumb and retarded. By the way, T-90 is a deep modification of T-72 so you are wrong and right at the same moment.

>T-72 doesn't have autoloader
Actually it does
The non-hydraulic ones were phased out and replased by electromechanical autoloaders with T-90 and later T-72 modifications, allowing tanks to fire both conventional rounds and ATGMs from the main cannon.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+4 votes
EA.GLE
EA.GLE

(buried)

For backward and the failed , thieves and debtors and criminals.

First T- 72 and T- 90 are the worst options for urban Warfare. War in the Caucasus . You can read or just speak bla - bla - bla.

Western states do not require auto - loader because it increases the weight of the vehicle, just feed them the ammunition depot .

Western tanks do not need to shoot quickly, because it hits the target on the first shot with advanced sensors.

Base of T72- T90A are some of the worst tanks Regarding the survival of the crew .

Their advantage is that they are simple, easy cheap , primitive to operate for army conscripts blunt , no professional army , that costs money , and the Russians do not.

T - 72 and T - 90 are scrap .

T-72B3 -T-72B4 have autoloader

Reply Good karma Bad karma-8 votes
TypicalRussianIvan
TypicalRussianIvan

That's what I said. Sometimes I think that you don't even read what I write and just yell at the monitor like a monkey. I mentioned T-72 is bad for urban warfare, that's why BMPT and T-14 were developed in the first place. But excellent for open-field battles.

Because Abrams, Leopard etc are not heavy enough, yes.

Are you dumb or yes? Who cares how good your sensors are If the dynamic protection is going to make the first shot useless? It's the matter of ammo, not sensors. If Germany produced tungsten made ammo can't even penetrate basic T-80 having no dynamic protection, what can it do with T-90 for example? And Abramses have only proven themselves good at fighting 10 years older naked Arab T-72 which are not modern tanks for sure. Abrams was good for it's time but now it's getting an overpraised outdated machine and upgrades won't change much. If Germans had uranium ammo, I would say Leopard 2A6 is the leader, but right now I'm all for South Korean K1.

Back to autoloaders. Do you even know what autoloader is needed for? It doesn't necessarily should reload tank's shot just like a handgun. It is needed for delivering the ammo right to the barrel so the only thing the gunner need is to hit a shell like a karate-champion and chamber it into the barrel. That's the most basic of autoloaders and T-72, and even T-64 already had them. So they wouldn't need the 4th member to bring the shells, exactly how the Abrams works. The artillery situation is worse. Paladin reloading process is not far from 1910 gun carriages or 1930 cannons.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
EA.GLE
EA.GLE

(buried)

Ok. Peace all weapons. I study military vehicles in air-land-sea-space and cyber space around ten years, but my english is very low for battle with you, so peace all weapons. You are win..ok

This criminals..... are communist not You.
Ok

Reply Good karma Bad karma-6 votes
TypicalRussianIvan
TypicalRussianIvan

Allright, allright, it seems like I got carried away. I'm not just making this up, okay? I'm studying in Siberian Sukhoi military aircraft construction university myself and have a friend working at Uralvagonzavod for several years. I would never get myself into an argument with a topic I know nothing about. I just don't like when someone judges Russian army not by reality, but by Tom Clancy's books (He was a special kind of retard when the thing came to technical characteristics). Not Russian myself, but born and raised in Kazakhstan I sympathise them. And I myself have never undrestimated Western armies before so I don't like when it "We are the best, they are the worst" way from the other side. I apologize If I was rude in some way.

As far as they definitely weren't the best political movement they were the ones who saved Russia in WW2. The idea of unity of the people and such things. Yes, Western countries like to compare millions of Soviet losses and way smaller losses of the US army. But it's easy to say when you are on another mainland. Soviets suffered heavy losses, but switch USA and USSR geographicaly in 1941 and US wouldn't survive at all.

Well, peace to you. Didn't want to be rude or anything.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+4 votes
EA.GLE
EA.GLE

(buried)

By the way
Autoloaders is slower than manual loader.
Manual loader is more effective for diferent types ammo use.

Autoloader is more sensitive to fail.
Autoloader can fast fire one type munition.
One reason why Russia use autoloader is Low profile for their Tanks.

Reply Good karma Bad karma-6 votes
TypicalRussianIvan
TypicalRussianIvan

>Autoloader is slower than manual loader
This Youtube.com
And this Youtube.com

I know those are artillery pieces. But the firing tempo percentage difference for tanks would be the same.

>Manual loader is more effective for diferent types ammo use.

True. But that's the point of perspective. Western tanks were designed for urban battles with Bunker-tank design in mind. Eastern tanks were designed for open-field large combats able to fight with little air support. Hence the requirement of using different munitions.

>Autoloader is more sensitive to fail.
Apart from being badly designed it can fail because ouf outer damage that could be done with a good shot. The Dynamic Defense worked well in Syria so nor first, nor second will be the problem. Because of the "drum" scheme of ammo location you can still load ammo manually with auto-loader damaged.

>One reason why Russia use autoloader is Low profile for their Tanks.
In no way I believe that Armata is a low-profile tank. But even without that, Leclerc, South Korean K1, Mitsubishi Type 90 also do have an autoloader.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
EA.GLE
EA.GLE

(buried)

By the way. T72 don't have automatic loader.
T72 have loader, but is manually use.

Reply Good karma Bad karma-9 votes
EA.GLE
EA.GLE

(buried)

I'm not disappointed with what humans are stupid

Reply Good karma Bad karma-9 votes
EA.GLE
EA.GLE

(buried)

http://fofanov.armor.kiev.ua/Tanks/EQP/al-72.html

Reply Good karma Bad karma-9 votes
Arios
Arios

The M-60 and M1A2 hybrid.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+4 votes
landro117
landro117

Ah finally, an update
Can't wait for the next patch :P

Reply Good karma Bad karma+4 votes
Eduardo82
Eduardo82

Nice :-)

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
rkraptor70
rkraptor70

Turkey is NOT amused!

(They are the biggest user of this thing)

Reply Good karma Bad karma0 votes
jfpoliveira12
jfpoliveira12

My country also still uses M60s. They are still a good defensive vehicle.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
rkraptor70
rkraptor70

Not the M60T (AKA Sabra) it was developed by Israel specifically for Turkey.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
Alexei_Stukov Author
Alexei_Stukov

Yes it is mainly Israel modification, but since we need more variety of tanks for USA I think it is good and fit well :)

Reply Good karma+3 votes
murauder
murauder

Why does the USA need a more varied selection of tanks?

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Alexei_Stukov Author
Alexei_Stukov

Because I want it :)

Reply Good karma+2 votes
jfpoliveira12
jfpoliveira12

Well yes, not the Sabra variant, but still M60s.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Battleship0003
Battleship0003

Neat... What about my suggestions?

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Alexei_Stukov Author
Alexei_Stukov

Many changes will appear in next patch

Reply Good karma+2 votes
Battleship0003
Battleship0003

Including my suggestions?

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Alexei_Stukov Author
Alexei_Stukov

Not all...

Reply Good karma+2 votes
Battleship0003
Battleship0003

I changed 1 of them.

Reply Good karma Bad karma0 votes
zhxhrzs1
zhxhrzs1

Turkey have this tank damaged by ISIS yesterday.

Reply Good karma Bad karma-2 votes
moddb_dev
moddb_dev

So,tank didn't destroy.Only, tank's armor system took damage.Tank crew survived

İdiot ISIS :D

Reply Good karma Bad karma+6 votes
Dr.Thrax123
Dr.Thrax123

The model is really nice! I know the Sabra looks cool, but if you wanted an M60 modification made by the US, look at the M60-2000 or M60 A4S. I think the M60-2000 would've looked cooler than the A4S though. Anyways, since you went this route I wouldn't ask you to change it, as it is great looking!

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Metekete
Metekete

Alexei are u removed this baby from game.I cant see it

P.S:I cant see Rah-66 comache in the game.WHERE IS THIS CHOPPER YOU MAKE RESKIN AND ADDED IN THE GAME RIGHT??

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
tom111
tom111

I love this model, and a very unique tank as well.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Post a comment
Sign in or join with:

Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.

Description

This is the modification of US M-60 tank. It is not originally made by USA, but I like it. The model was made by GeneralIgorr, modified, redone and skinned by me.

Details
Date
Size
1130×575
Options
URL
Embed
Embed Thumb
Share
New
Add media
Feed
RSS