A futuristic, fast paced, first person grappling adventure!

Report RSS Mapping progress and possible engine switch

Talk about the progression of the mod and maps, and where we would like to go next. Be sure to voice your opinion on the possible engine switch!

Posted by on

Hey all!

Let's catch up shall we? I (Alex) have recently been hired as a software engineer by a local company and unfortunately I've lost quite a bit of free time to devote to this project. But let me please make this clear to all of you.

WE ARE NOT DEAD!!!

Hahaha, just trying to restructure life and giving this project the A-Tension it deserves even if it is on evenings and weekends. And yes that pun was intended, horribly, horribly intended.

We also have been looking more and more into the UDK, it definitely gives us larger maps to work with as well as a gorgeous set of tools and our models will look infinitely better. I am willing to take on the port to the Unreal engine as long as our community is behind me!

So please comment and respond about what you think about switching engines, bearing in mind that this would increase options for both map detail/size, overall graphics and distribution down the road.Now lets get to the current progress on source, Zach has been working on detailing out cities more as well as implementing our goal system into a new work in progress city map.

Trying to nail down the art style has been weighing us down hard so any suggestions are always good!

Overview - City Map 1Goal system in place - City map 1Is that a crane? - City Map 1Rooftop corridor - City Map 1

And as a closer, check out a little Minecraft skin of the old suit.. Oh did i say old suit? =]

Little Fun In Minecraft

Please let us know what you think about the engine switch guys, as well as the art style it really helps us out!
Comment/Email/PM's are always appreciated.

- Alex Soustek (Tension Team)

Post comment Comments  (0 - 50 of 52)
SPY-maps
SPY-maps - - 2,904 comments

a engine switch, my god, not you too guys!?!?!

i can imagine that the UDK does look very promising right now, and maybe it would be a good choice to do so. but, please keep in mind that a whole lot of projects that have been changing from engine did die simply because you have to start all over again, (ok, not really all over, but still, i guess you know what i mean.) a lot of team take the jump to another engine and after some time they see that they get because of this so much extra work that they stop eventually. i don't say this will happen to you, but the risk is there. and, you already said yourself that a team member had to leave and that you only can work in weekends and evenings on this, and to make a engine change then??? i wouldn't do it, although i do get it that it looks very appealing. but it will make that a whole lot of what already was done has to be done all over again. changing engines is not so quickly done as it first maybe does seem to be...
i suggest you finish this project, and then go to a new engine.

but, this is just my personal opinion.

leon

Reply Good karma Bad karma+11 votes
Neoplayer2
Neoplayer2 - - 22 comments

seconded.

If you switch to UDK, does that mean I would have to own a UDK game? Or could I just get the mod?

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
tymaxbeta
tymaxbeta - - 1,059 comments

Honestly, all this switching is Valves fault in my opinion, if they could just catch up with the time and release SOMETHING for independent development, the world would a better place, you think that if I could build indy games on Source I wouldn't, you're crazy. Source is one of, if not the, best engines out there, Gabe needs to realize that every other major engine [literally now with Crytech out there] has gone indy, it's time for Valve to put out a tool set, but until then, UDK is the closest thing to Source we have in terms of the methodology behind level scripting and creation. I know first hand that switching to UDK is sad, but it's the next best thing to Source for me, if these guys are doing full game quality work, and Valve wont support them, mainly because Valve hasn't supported ANY community mods on Steamworks since 2007, or earlier, then let them have their way. Valve needs to come back an support the modding community, or make a toolset. Why did they ever stop supporting us anyhow?

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
AnotherOne1 Author
AnotherOne1 - - 71 comments

We have been thinking about this for months, trust me I'm not exactly giddy to write a ton of effing unreal script. Hell i have just now acknowledged it as "possible" to port.

We would take baby steps, since as the coder i'm not doing a whole lot right now anyway (gameplay being pretty solid) i would take a stab at it. We wouldn't go deleting our source code or anything. Worst case we drop back to right where we are in Tension...

I would never discard all the work I've done on source, that'd just be ridiculous i wish i had the resources to develop both in tandem :/

I am fine with the source engine as a code base (love it actually) but i know for a fact the tools are so awful.. And as we look at a large chunk of content creation ahead it definitely looks promising.

Reply Good karma+2 votes
DuckSauce
DuckSauce - - 969 comments

AnotherOne1:
Remember me? From GraviNULL, added you on steam way back, we talked for a bit then.

If you guys make the switch, contact me if you want some help with smaller tidbits about UDK, been using it for a bit so I can save you some documentation scouring or code digging, so if you wanna talk hit me up on steam sometime.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+4 votes
thefoofighter
thefoofighter - - 71 comments

Really? Another mod going to Unreal This is turning into a joke :( Well if you wanna become Scripting Guru's go for it but Hard coding is the only true coding way and Personally i think you should finish what you started on the Source engine and then make it an indie game. That way its like Orion - a source version and an unreal version. The unreal version being more successful than the source version but the source version is more like a teaser. I dunno I think its a shame that so many mods are switching cause i think valve will take their finger out and release a new engine with the same licensing as unreal. Just a matter of when :P

Reply Good karma Bad karma+6 votes
AnotherOne1 Author
AnotherOne1 - - 71 comments

Very insightful.

Ah yes the "when" is always the kicker, I'm sure you're familiar with "Valve Time" it's hard to sink time into waiting for valve to drop an update. Alien Swarm was a baby step in the right direction and look how long that took em..

It's definitely a tough choice.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
ponpat
ponpat - - 129 comments

I am not so deep into the pros and cons of both engines but I can say: I love playing mods for source and I hate playing Unreal Engine Games... I hate the feeling this Engine gives me. Bullet Storm geve me that feeling, Homefront, too, Killing Floor and also The Ball Also Borderlands give me this feeling even if I loved this game and thon conzept of some of the other ones but when I play with the UE3-Engine I always have this bad feeling even if I didn't know it was the Unreal Engine.
Must sound very stupid and it is very subjectiv but I personally hate playing ue3 even if I always give the Engine a new chance the feeling in the games for me is terrible... So plz stay at the Source Engine or make it like thefoofighter said.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
cW#Ravenblood - - 6,703 comments

I knew that this wasnt dead cuz Nilghai was sometimes in his build :D

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
kazumo
kazumo - - 1,174 comments

No :( This game is unique for the Source engine...I would really like to play it, the source engine is so awesome, it runs on almost any PCs, It would suck to change the engine, but...if you guys want to do this :(...I will untrack because I can't play Unreal Engine games on my PC.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
MattB1023
MattB1023 - - 90 comments

Why was his comment thumbed down? Like him, I have a **** PC and can't run Unreal Engine games well. I can get 10-20 fps on low settings on most Unreal Engine games. I don't support the switch, but I will still track if you so, in case I upgrade my PC.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
bopence
bopence - - 12 comments

(buried)

i suggest if you were to change engine, go Cryengine 3! looks better than udk or source at the moment. and the feel of the engine and mechanics is much nicer.

Reply Good karma Bad karma-6 votes
medve
medve - - 1,475 comments

udkftw

Reply Good karma Bad karma-1 votes
DDguy
DDguy - - 702 comments

UDK is nice, but i would have wanted to see how this goes in source..

well, if you REALLY are going to change the engine, best of luck ;)

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Quansword
Quansword - - 112 comments

I would support going to udk full heartedly, honestly, it looks better, and if you go to udk then anyone could play this, I dont know why people are complaining.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Bon.
Bon. - - 172 comments

For those saying moving to the UDK is a joke, ultimately it will provide a better quality product. Although some may be in disbelief, the Source engine is very outdated, the tools used to create games on it are also extremely outdated and tedious to use, even Gabe admits that. Moving to the UDK will provide so many advantages and i completely support any mod group wanting to switch to it. The possibilities that the UDK can offer outweigh those of the source engine by far.

- Will

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Otter.
Otter. - - 1,355 comments

For me the UDK has a really different feel and not in a good way.
I tried out "The Ball" and I didn't really liked it. The maps where gorgeous yes, but the lighting still felt really weird and not very realistic, and don't get me start on the movement. It's like I was playing with a Quake live character (or UT, but since I played UT in a really long time I don't want to compare) I felt that I always crouched, the visibility/perspective was too wide, etc.
If you add a little head bobbing, some nice sounds it would be so much better on the Source I think, so I don't support an engine change.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
Bon.
Bon. - - 172 comments

Otter that is how that game was configured, anything from first person shooters to MMO's to RTS's can be crated using the unreal engine, its up to the designers to create the 'feel' as you put it. If you have seen the latest tech demo's from the UDK, im sure you will understand the sheer power of the UDK. As for unrealistic lighting, ive never played a game or mod on the source engine where ive thought wow that lighting looks real.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
KILLER89(FIN)
KILLER89(FIN) - - 2,311 comments

Valve is going to improve the Source´s modding tools.
Just wondering though, when they roll them out.

The tools are masochist´s wet day dream in their current state.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
jjawinte
jjawinte - - 5,067 comments

"tymaxbeta" summed up all the debate about this increasing trend quite neatly and realistically with this opening portion of his initial comment above: " Honestly, all this [ engine ] switching is Valves fault...". We all wait for Christmas once a year as it is.

[ Would-be ] developers and modders simply cannot afford to limit their visions and talents waiting around for Valve to release the tools to create unique and competitive projects. It's obvious that Valve isn't interested in being a part of this exciting new Indie business model, so to hell with them. You simply have to go with a decent company [ engine ] that is and learn some additional skills along the way.

Much success to the project;s progress in the future CGG !

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
Nilghai
Nilghai - - 885 comments

Very good point indeed

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
DuckSauce
DuckSauce - - 969 comments

From development perspective I say:
DO IT!
Source is so incredibly outdated, UDK is a different engine and while offering new advantages it may have it's downsides, just like Source does.

But, I've been using it for a fair while, so far there's nothing I couldn't do with UnrealScripts and doing it was always much easier than with Source's source code.

It also has a sexy editor and a variety of incredibly useful tools, that are just more up to date than Source's, assuming Source even has them.

From the perspective of the fans/watchers/players, you could get more players playing it... or less, I suspect it will be more, but there may be people out there with old outdated pc's that can't update because they may not be as well fairing as others out here, that's sad but...

I say go for it, it's a great engine, the requirements to run UDK games isn't insane, so you won't lose too many followers I think, but I recommend first trying to set up a basic version to see if the grappling and stuff can be "ported" over without losing the feel, otherwise you may be best sticking with Source, since the feel of the grappling is gonna be important for this kind of game I'd say.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+4 votes
Kamikazi[Uk]
Kamikazi[Uk] - - 1,412 comments

Here we go again with people thinking they can make a indie game just because they can change it to UDK. Finish this mod on source stop following the crowd and going to UDK just because you think you can be indie devolopers.

Reply Good karma Bad karma-4 votes
AnotherOne1 Author
AnotherOne1 - - 71 comments

Hahaha, I woke up one day and decided i wanted to port all code from Tension over to UDK because i thought I'd get the nifty label of "Indie-Developer"?

No offense but it's nuts to think that's why we would switch..

Reply Good karma+4 votes
DuckSauce
DuckSauce - - 969 comments

Hate to jump on you here, kamikazi, but that really was rude.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
PeacefulPatriot
PeacefulPatriot - - 1,514 comments

Go for UDK. If you're facing technical limitations, it's probably the way to go.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+4 votes
ReezeTheVampire
ReezeTheVampire - - 3,929 comments

DO NOT SWITCH!

Reply Good karma Bad karma0 votes
PeacefulPatriot
PeacefulPatriot - - 1,514 comments

@Neoplayer2
You can just get Tension. It will install the Unreal engine with it.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Bioknight
Bioknight - - 119 comments

Don't swich, source engine is awesome!
But i would support you say it's impossible/too hard with source ;)

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
GIJames
GIJames - - 55 comments

Judging from what you have said, you should switch to UDK.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Potteh.
Potteh. - - 66 comments

I don't know why but I felt the post was rather lacking and more like it was written by a 14 year old. On the grounds of what you've stated. I'd say switching would be rather silly, without some incredibly interesting storyline anyway. I'd say go with Source on this one because let's face it, if it was on UDK, it would just look like Mirror's Edge with a grappling hook.

Reply Good karma Bad karma-4 votes
AnotherOne1 Author
AnotherOne1 - - 71 comments

I don't know why it being on UDK would make it look any more/less like Mirrors Edge.. And the rest, just sorta rude mate TBH.

We would switch because of map size limitations (source == a ton of loads) among other things, why is stuff like that silly?

I understand where you are coming from, i love Source, but it's decrepit in it's current state..

Reply Good karma+1 vote
Potteh.
Potteh. - - 66 comments

I wasn't having a dig at the mod. But source can look fancy with the right amount of work, look at City17 with their shaders, look at manyer games that have been designed on the Source engine and can be great. The reason for the Mirror's Edge pun was purely based on art style, I've seen a lot of references to it in screenshots, so I presumed you were going for the similarities of Mirror's Edge. I mean look at the percentage of comments, there's a multitude of people stating that they would be disappointed if you went to the UDK. If I were you, I'd stick to Source on the bases of your demographic.

Reply Good karma Bad karma0 votes
Luigisno1
Luigisno1 - - 322 comments

well looks like I wont be able to get this mod.

Reply Good karma Bad karma-2 votes
eatleadsukka
eatleadsukka - - 81 comments

This would mean that i would have to play this on Unreal Engine? Not happening. I hate the look of unreal 3. If you switch you will lose your followers to a new audience.
So i do not approve.
As for the map size... I've seen some huge source maps (evocity_v2/v3). The map i just stated is amazingly enormous. Just about a full 5 square miles.
So think about that...

Reply Good karma Bad karma-3 votes
twincannon
twincannon - - 38 comments

so... you hate good graphics? Nice opinion bro.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
SysOp.
SysOp. - - 1,039 comments

I could say this from years of experience:

IS NOT ABOUT THE ENGINE, IS ABOUT THE KICK *** GAME YOU CAN OR CAN NOT DO WITH IT.

Period.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Redeemer_SVK
Redeemer_SVK - - 4 comments

I say go for UDK. VALVe has to feel that they abandoned moding scene by not delivering 'nextgen' toolset. And IMHO Source hasn't moved anywhere in terms of technology since OB. I don't live in year 2011 with y2011 hw to play y2007 quality games.

For a loong time I was realy big fan of Source and played Source mods exclusively (h:s, dys, emp, ins ... tried every mp mod released or that was popular those days). Hell, those games even rlz these days (playing dys+emp occasionally but it always rocks). But for new titles, I really want to see them on something better.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
jjawinte
jjawinte - - 5,067 comments

" Redeemer " hit's it right on the head here: I've been playing on Source and enjoying Source [ community ] mods for many years, but if it's new, I want it to feel that it's new when I play it.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
DaLuig
DaLuig - - 200 comments

*cough* Portal 2 engine *cough*

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Redeemer_SVK
Redeemer_SVK - - 4 comments

Where's the Portal 2 visually different from for example Portal 1 ? I really don't see any improvement in visual quality there. Same res textures, same boxy models ...

Reply Good karma Bad karma0 votes
PeacefulPatriot
PeacefulPatriot - - 1,514 comments

Dynamic shadowing, massive maps, improved water reflection, self shadowing, scripted destruction and cinematic physics, massive improvements to all props and textures, improved animation...

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
curlymilton
curlymilton - - 15 comments

The Unreal Engine does have nice effects...but I've always found games on that\those engine(s) ( dating all the way back to UT ) to not behave that well in the movement department. Either way I'm sure I'll play this mod...but I'd rather it stay Source. The Unreal renderer looks odd to me as well. I personally like how HL2\L4D\Portal\etc. look...even if they have fewer bells and whistles. Plus, with less than 4 characters on screen at once, I don't see why the models can't be higher poly than regular Source games ( that have alot more player\npcs to render at once ).

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
curlymilton
curlymilton - - 15 comments

Also, as a modder myself I am waiting to see what Golden Gabe rolls out on the SDK side of things now that Portal 2 is out.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
DevinShadowV
DevinShadowV - - 534 comments

were can we download the UDK engine? plus yeah just wait valve is updating there source UDK soon

Reply Good karma Bad karma0 votes
curlymilton
curlymilton - - 15 comments

You can get the udk through steam

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
m4x0r
m4x0r - - 43 comments

You have so much more potential with UDK, it might be harder, but you can actually make your own game rather than haphazardly attempting to turn Half Life 2 into a game you want to make. If you guys are willing to put the effort in, which it seems you are considering all the work I've seen so far on this mod, I say do it and you'll be thankful in the end. It's not like you've gotten to the point where the switch is impossible. All of your code-based ideas will be possible with your coder I'm sure too. And the people who are saying you'll have to start from scratch obviously have no experience doing anything like this. Don't take the comments of not being able to run Unreal seriously either. The Unreal engine is easily one of the most optimized gaming engines currently available, and if these people "can't run it" I doubt they can even run Source.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
HmTervapuro
HmTervapuro - - 532 comments

Rather do the Source version first, and if there´s still inspiration left, do a new, better build on UDK etc. That´ll get you a good amount of player feedback and a good perspective on actually how to make a better game on the better tools.

The art style so far seems good, I dig.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
WNxKraid
WNxKraid - - 225 comments

Since we've recently changed to UDK with our mod as well, all i can say is: do it.

Much more freedome with allmost everything.
Material system is far superior.
While i wasted a lot of time to achive a certain effect on source and never got it anywhere close to what i wanted, it took me a short research and a few minutes of work to get it right on UDK.

The only problem you need to keep in mind is that the focus of UDK is far more model based.
So either you got a lot more modellers then mappers on your team (or at least very productive ones), need very few props or your mappers are also able to create their own models.
In your case it might be the 2nd thing. (depending on the artstyle you'll choose in the end)

I've allready seen some youtube vids of a grappling hook working in UDK and we're planning to add something much similar to our mod (Grappling beam ala metroid prime).

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
jmarquiso
jmarquiso - - 14 comments

Please don't switch engines at this stage. Get a workable demo or prototype out and when you have funding, change engines.

Basically do what you're doing. The current stylized look is beautiful, and will keep you distinct.

Source also has a greater sense of speed than UDK (I've noticed).

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Post a comment

Your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community. Or sign in with your social account: