Aeon T3 heavy Assault bot v2 image - Revamp Expansion Mod (RVE) for Supreme Commander 2

you could have said any other car company but Mercedes... now i cant get that image out of my head

Yeah, I know what you mean... they have curves in all the right places.

we did not see the same things then i can understand the 6x6 big bulky uef but i have had some bad memorys with mercedes but hey what ever float your boat ichigo

huehuehue I get the reference :P

Well it's definitely a better fit for the role, but maybe you can reuse the old model for a support bot or something...

it most definitely does but this unit at least from what i remember had only 1 gun not 3 its main gun was balanced between fire power and fire rate with its shield to compensate for the rest so i really don't think it needs 3 guns even if it is a tier 3 assault bot
the only team that had a unit with 3 guns was the seraphim and i don't think the aeon liked the Othuum that much

so it will cost much more i presume that's what you mean will the original be available for building or is that scratched?
and how is it that only the aeon are using seraphim tech i think uef and cybran are just as capable to get it and use it as well as aeon

so in other words this will be a walker version of the Othuum im not going to complain all long as its cost is equal to its ability their wont e a problem...
and please keep in mind this all started just because i didn't like the main cannon its the curves on top i think it would give it a much more bulky tanky look if they where on the bottom is it possible to flip the gun?

"more tanky" hahahah describing something more than 20 stories tall as "tanky" almost seems like underrating it.

these robots are no where near 20 stories high in fact this robot would be lucky to break 4 stories high and at the moment with today tech we could take it down no problem even if it had a shield generator

are you drunk?? i cant tell if your trolling or drunk. if your being serious, you must be crazy. i was tempted not to reply back but saying we could take this thing down AT ALL makes me interested in how(if you are being serious) we would take this thing down with todays tech without wasting a nuke. so hell, ill reply.

how many years more years advanced is the universe of supcom compared to today? quite a few. if a single harbinger is quite a foe in the universe of supcom, what weapons could we use against it? im guessing youl throw a nuke at it or bomb it or some **** but thats only if its far from civilization but it would be a problem if it were say in the middle of a city

secondly. your saying these robots. if your saying all of supcom, a storey is 10 feet. even the tiny mech marine is about four stories tall.

you said without a shield. we have little idea what the shields are exactly but seeing as how after some research, this unit would be a little over 20 stories tall, and even if it were only 4, it is a challenge for the units of supcom, how do you think we could take it down? a nuke would work but you said no problem so how about if it pops up in the middle of a city? we cant even handle the transformers by ourselves! i will laugh at your response, i know it.

ok zombie gather your brains i'm going to throw some pics at you
Img.4plebs.org
I41.tinypic.com
I43.tinypic.com
ok based on these pics the average mech marine is 3 stories high correct?
a tier 2 unit on average is about 2 times taller than a tier 1 correct?
this can only mean that a tier 3 is twice as big as a tier 2 which is a total of 6 times larger than a tier 1 correct?(in reality only about .5 times bigger but these odds are in you favor)
so with these things in mind then a tier 3 is roughly 6 times larger than a mech marine ok so if an average floor is about 10 feet tall (3.048) then multiply 6 by 11.7 which give you 70 divide that give you 23ish story’s tall ( wow look at that a lot less than 40)
if this thing where to appear in my world abiding by our physics no matter when or where It came from no matter where it would go weather a dessert or the middle of India I am absolutely freaken positive that we could wreck not just one but 100 of these things no problem don’t sell our army’s short buddy we can split with planet in half if we wanted to but then there would be no one to show how strong we are, if you don't think a bunker buster to the face would stop with thing then you need to read up on what they can do or maybe a couple of shells from a battleship or maybe an airstrike the list is endless...
(we fought transformers I don’t remember this?)
of the whole rant thing could someone check my math its easy i just want to make sure i got it right i feel like i messed it up

also the Uef are still using shells so their cant be that big of a bridge in time between our times and technology...
and aeon has paper thin armor they use their shields to soak up damage if it does not have a shield it will be super weak!

i told you youd say airstrike or nuke, i also said 20 stories, not 40, i also already said that it would need to be in the middle of nowhere otherwise we wouldnt nuke it. if it were in the middle of india, india would be ****** because there would be no way we would use heavy explosives in a heavily populated area.

when i mentioned transformers, considering they were real, the recent movies would accurately portray how humanity would deal with them. by ourselves we would have failed utterly. i swear to god if you say "we should have nuked them" im done talking.

here. this is a single uef acu versus all three planetside 2 factions pitted against it.

Forums.spacebattles.com

in short, yes, we could easily just nuke it and destroy it but not if it were in a populated area.

lastly, having to nuke it/airstrike it would be a problem because that would mean no other weapons would work against it.

(sorry about not reading previously) we have other means of heavy damage without explosives including microwaves and AC-130s we could defeat them i'm telling you...

transformers never existed and if we are going into movie threats then i think independence day was a way larger threat to us than any metal army i mean think about it that was a lot of shielded czars just coming out of the sky like it was no big deal and we won that even though i hated that hacking crap but either way in transformers the military didn't even mobilize and guess what they where using heavy explosives in a very crowded city whoopy

i don't really understand this planet side 2 thing i mean the uef acu cant even fire at air targets so missle pods on like 5 or 6 aircraft could drop that in about a minute with the amount of dps the commander only starts with 12000 the Vanguard has 4000 hp and a super shield 3 of these could stand their ground and how will with commander set up his army without any mass points all the units he can destroy are phased out of existence in about 15 seconds i really cant see it setting up a base in less than an 2 hours or farming tanks and trying to get up a mass fabricator

stop saying nukes man air strikes are very very common and pretty cheap if their is no damage done to the planes so you could take out a lot in little time and i have been forgetting helicopters those things are actuate not high explosive do ridiculous damage and fly so no targeting their i mean any commander would loose to a cybran gun ship rush in lets say 5 minutes even if he had a hand full of archers(no he wouldn't just build archers thats stupid)
why only uef acu they are human why not a phim for once that would be interesting and more realistic

why didnt we airstrike the transformers? why didnt we airstrike the mutos or godzilla?

the only thing that allowed us to defeat the aliens in independence day was the hacking attempt.

again, how much more advanced is supcom in comparison to now? a thousand years. why dont we airstrike **** in supcom? because it is obsolete.

the deal in planetside 2 isnt about the numbers, its about the size comparison to be realistic.

first, the tanks in sucom are HUGE. dwarfing even the maus. id say a damn scout bike would be as big as the maus, maybe even bigger. the uef t2 pillar tank is comparable in size to the ratte german land dreadnaugt, the biggest tank ever designedm Img197.imageshack.us . add about a thousand years of advanced technology to it and you have the pillar. the aeon harbinger is about six times the size of the pillar, equipped with a shield and heavy laser cannon and can take on three pillars no sweat.
you said you dont understand, dont try to paste things where you think they would be if you dont understand it in the first place and you clearly do not understand the point of this whole arguement. im only using the planetside 2 thing to gauge how effective the uef would be versus planetside, both are human, just like us. and by comparing the uef to a lesser advanced humanity, we can gauge how effective the harbinger would be versus current human technology. hell you want to try gauging the effectiveness of a SERAPHIM acu versus current human technology?? im done with this arguement because you clearly do not understand the point of it, just like i assumed when i first started this.

i correct myself, supcom is over a thousand years more advanced in comparison to todays technology. if you think we would be so effective versus the aeon with our current technology, why then did we almost lose the infinite war? without black sun, humanity would have been obliterated.

thats another thing thq kinda ****** up on. the beginnign to the games had nothing to do with the ending of the previous. the closest outcome comparable to the beginning of each game is the cybrans who used black sun to stop long range instant transportation. the aeon ending was to send a global message of peace, though the uef ending used black sun to destroy planets, which would have ended the war but eradicated every other race.

we use air strikes in sup com all the time all it requires to be called an airstrike is a plane and a target engineering snipes com snipes exp snipes are all air strikes and they will never become obsolete so long as we have planes
also we could beat the aeon tech their shields can only take so much beating before they shutdown and aeon armor is super weak (im guessing to make the shield so strong) this planet would not stand a chance against an ACU (except mass points???) experimentals are also on that list of we can't win
my whole argument is that we would win if we fought this specific robot their would be loss but thats expected from any kind of fight i really feel that you are also underestimating present day technology
you keep saying 1000 years of progress but it couldn't have all been into combat and weapons i mean look at the uef they just using bigger bullets when they could add like tracking systems to them to make each one guided but they dont... we have that technology now we just haven't used it yet sup com is advanced but they really aren't that far ahead of us its like taking a humvee into the civil war with unlimited gas and ammo sure it would do great but a cannon could still take it out and this thing is a magic devil chariot compared to anything they have at the time

its still a thousand years more advanced. we could airstrike it, but it would need to be in the middle of nowhere otherwise we wouldnt use explosives powerful enough to dent it. the lightest weapon we could use against it would be an airstrike and thats a problem. airstrikes may be cheap, but if we arent in the middle of nowhere, we wouldnt do that. you think about the transformers where those jets came in and hit megatron with a couple missiles. first, those are about the size of the anti air missiles used in supcom, and probably just about as powerful.

HAHAHAHAHA a civil war cannon versus a humvee?? the most it would do versus a humvee of today would be dent it. theyd need a lot of time to load the cannon for a second shot in the first place and the humvee would probably have killed the soldiers operating the cannon far before they even loaded the gun. the only chance a full sized army would have versus a humvee would be hidden sticks of tnt or something like that.

y know this arguement is more like a discussion, despite it being an arguement, i think you and i could be friends since your so good at making walls of text when discussing things like this. how about we become friends and we continue this discussion through pms so we dont plague this things comment section with walls of text that probably nobody else is reading but us.

this is your call i think this is leading no where so it might turn out we are both just stubborn ********

Umm.... you know, the Cybran Megalith MK2 has 1. his Main Gun, 2. his Beam Lasers, 3. the Anti Air Missiles. 1... 2... 3... 3 Guns . Look at the UEF Fat Boy MK2 how many guns he did have...???? So why 3 guns ??? Because it can have 3 !!!

you a right about the megalith it only has 2 more guns than the original (no torpedoes no building capability and not capable of being amphibious)
the fat boy mark 2 had 5 1 more than the the original (no shield cant make units not amphibious no anti air weak it was and no torpedoes)
do you see a trend here more guns means less something else as the TF2 engineer says "sometimes you just need a little less gun"