An expansion/overhaul mod of epic proportions, with entirely rebalanced gameplay, expanded factions, new gametypes, graphical overhauls, and five new factions; stealth-based Confederate Revolutionaries, tower defense-inspired Atomic Kingdom of China, economy-focused Mediterranean Syndicate, DotA-esque Order of the Talon and spammy Electrical Protectorate.
Poll: What is better, Apoc, or Hammer? |
Posts | ||
---|---|---|
Hammer/Apoc Comparision Thread | Locked | |
Thread Options | ||
Jul 8 2011 Anchor | ||
Continuing the conversation from the flankers thread, this is a thread to talk about Apocs and Hammers. Enjoy! |
||
Jul 8 2011 Anchor | ||
Honestly, the Apoc is massively more cost-effective at its job. The Hammer is faster, and due to greater numbers is less weak to things like Cryocopters, but thats about the only reason to use a Hammer Tank over an Apocalypse Tank. |
||
|
Jul 8 2011 Anchor | |
They're are both being rebalanced so that using apocs as a main battle tank will be inmpracticle, but very good as a lead attack... thing. Point is moot. -- Yours faithfully, That guy who does hammy stuff on a regular basis. |
||
|
Jul 9 2011 Anchor | |
like I said before and BR-II said: Blood-Russia-Mk2 wrote: They're are both being rebalanced so that using apocs as a main battle tank will be inmpracticle, but very good as a lead attack... thing. Point is moot. |
||
Jul 9 2011 Anchor | ||
I find the Hammer is better because of it's greater versatility and speed. If you leech beam a Multigunner, it will be a weaker and cheaper version of the RA2 Apoc. |
||
Jul 10 2011 Anchor | ||
Like I said, if it's better people will still find a way to spam it and mass it to turn them into an end-game weapon |
Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.