Republic Assault is a full scale conversion mod for the Petroglyphy game Star Wars Forces of Corruption. Using elements from both the current canon, and existing EU to create the best possible game experience.

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
Report RSS Enforcer- class Star Frigate showcase Render (view original)
Enforcer- class Star Frigate showcase Render
embed
share
view previous next
Share Image
Share on Facebook Post Email a friend
Embed Image
Post comment Comments
NodGuy
NodGuy - - 459 comments

Beautiful.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
StarFireReaper
StarFireReaper - - 23 comments

Looking good, hope the polly count isn't too high. Eagerly waiting for this mod's next version :)

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Bucman55
Bucman55 - - 795 comments

Even if the poly count were within acceptable parameters, this ship probably wouldn't come to the mod as it was created by the Pentastar Alignment after the Battle of Endor, way out of the mod's time-frame.

It's a great model though, I'll say that.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+4 votes
Svenwalker94
Svenwalker94 - - 1,048 comments

Love the model but there is one thing that bugs me

This ship was fielded by Pentaster Alignment which was a post endor faction not the Empire

Judging by that logic you should have the the New republic in as well

Its good that you guys are putting a few empire ships to represent the post clone wars era but judging by the amount of imperial ships that were developed just or well into the GCW kinda confuses me

Sorry about being a that guy

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Sergeant Barlex Creator
Sergeant Barlex - - 1,753 comments

Many of these high poly ships, are just Elratie showing off his work.

However, I do have plans for some ships in the CIS Holdout era as they're low poly (Kontos, Vigil, Fulgor, ISD).

While some of the newer ships (Interdictor, Vindicator, Allegiance) will have a fair amount of details stripped down for EaW.

Reply Good karma+3 votes
steddy96
steddy96 - - 315 comments

I just hope that all these high-poly ships later don't become a problem while the game is running

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Negtharayas16
Negtharayas16 - - 360 comments

Looks great. NO. Fantastic!

Mandatory question: why no hangar? As I understand it, the reason the Enforcer was such a powerful design was because it was built on the principles (and skeleton) of the original Vindicator (which was itself excellent) but with the enhanced reactors developed for the later Immobilizer Frigate, which allowed more power for shields, engines, and weapons. According to wikia, it even gained an additional squadron (more space somehow?). Now, is that LEGACY Enforcer a little too much to swallow... yeeeeaah. Maybe just not have the EXTRA squadron. :D

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Elratie Author
Elratie - - 571 comments

Thanks ^^

Somewhere i did read that it had no hangar, also there would be no need to name it as a new class, just name it Vindicator 2, slap the better generators on it and call it a day.
On Wookie is also no mention of fighter squadrons on this ship Starwars.wikia.com

If someone dosent like it as what i made it, call it artistic freedome :p

Reply Good karma+2 votes
Khanti
Khanti - - 452 comments

There are lot of artistic freedom in SW designs. But from military side - ships without fighter escort are just cannon fodder.
I don't say - it need to storage tons of bombers - but those 1-2 squadrons of dedicated fighters (without hangar) will suit.
Nice ship by the way!

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Sephiroth0812
Sephiroth0812 - - 725 comments

The Enforcer-class doesn't have a hangar at all.

In terms of use and role, the Enforcer is to the Vindicator what the Tector is to the ISD-I.

The Pentastar Alignment developed the Enforcer as a quick-to-build fast picket cruiser to fill out its ranks and to increase its fleet numbers.
The Enforcer could fight light to medium capital ships and fighters equally good due to its mixed armaments so it didn't really need always a fighter screen.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Negtharayas16
Negtharayas16 - - 360 comments

Yes - you are both correct regarding the hangar. I apologize. I try to keep as much to Wikipedia as possible, but many times I go to other sites/sources to fill in details. I checked and in this instance (Holopedia), there was a conflict between sources, and obviously Wikia wins out. Sorry for the confusion. :D

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Khanti
Khanti - - 452 comments

There is no term "it didn't need a fighter screen". All ships need a fighter screen, or are dead.
Unless the author sets the probability of firing by fighters to ships so low that the fighters will only fly and look nice. Otherwise, fighters always win.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Post a comment

Your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community. Or sign in with your social account:

Description

Finished the second variation of the Vindicator hull.

Not much of a change removed hangarbay, for more internal power generation, stronger shields, adding 2 Ion cannons and 2 Long Range MTL´s.

Weaponcount:

10x Light Turbolaser turrets
10x Medium Quad Turbolaser turrets
6x Medium Long Range Turbolaser turrets
2x Single Ball Ion Cannon turrets (trench)
2x Concussion Missile Launchers with 12 tubes each

Polygoncount is 150k

Design by Fractalsponge.net (Vindicator Hull)