Halo: Starside Intercept is a Homeworld 2 total conversion bringing tactical space combat to the Halo universe.

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
Report RSS Revised Scale Chart (view original)
Revised Scale Chart
embed
share
view previous next
Share Image
Share on Facebook Post Email a friend
Embed Image
Post comment Comments
Grindpantera
Grindpantera - - 264 comments

I didn't expect to see the Forerunner ship in here, can't wait to hear on it in the future.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
CanadaMan7
CanadaMan7 - - 2,586 comments

The Key ship is more than a little off-scale.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
blad3mastr
blad3mastr - - 70 comments

ya I always thought it was much larger than an assault carrier

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Brainlaag
Brainlaag - - 280 comments

It is. About 14k so its badly off scale.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
RINGLEADER Author
RINGLEADER - - 358 comments

The keyship really isn't that big, on the Tsavo Highway level of Halo 3, you can see 2 CCS class battlecruisers excavating the portal generator, and it's only marginally larger then them:

I222.photobucket.com

Loftus based his measurements off of the in game models and how large they would be when compared to High Charity, but remember that Bungie often times used exaggeration of scale to accentuate game elements or because of engine constraints. We don't have to adhere to these constraints because the limitations of Homeworld 2 are far less pronounced.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
blahman919
blahman919 - - 9 comments

Length
11.41 kilometers (7.09 miles)
Width
13.18 kilometers (8.19 miles)
Height/depth
14 kilometers (8.70 miles)
is the size of the key ship/ Forerunner Dreadnought
Halo.wikia.com

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
880Zero
880Zero - - 2,557 comments

I was under the impression the Marathon and Halcyon Cruisers were almost the same size.

Halcyon: 1,170 meters
Marathon: 1,190 meters

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
RINGLEADER Author
RINGLEADER - - 358 comments

The Marathon model was used to show the Pillar of Autumn escaping a burning Reach in Halo 2, so as far as in game models go, we know that Bungie liked to use material interchangeably, so we aren't accepting that measurement. We chose to base our measurements off of The Fall of Reach novel by Eric Nylund, which offers the only size comparative between the Marathon and the Halcyon that we know of.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
880Zero
880Zero - - 2,557 comments

As I sated before:
Halcyon: 1,170 meters
Marathon: 1,190 meters

This is, of course, by the book measurements. And probably the Halo Encyclopedia. Have you read it?

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
RINGLEADER Author
RINGLEADER - - 358 comments

Which book?

Not to bash the writers of the Halo Encyclopedia, but I'm sure the thought process that went into that adding that particular measurement was: 'does it exist online within 5 seconds of now?', and not: 'does it already exist within our established canon?'.

Additionally, every mention of the Halcyon and Marathon cruiser makes the Marathon seem a lot larger even though it's only a few dozen meters longer. Firstly, a 1,190 meter Marathon is not larger then a 1,170 meter Halcyon because the Marathon is a skinnier, more open ship. Its like saying a 1.001km length of rope is larger then a 1km skyscraper, that's not really how things are measured in this universe or the Halo universe. You see, in both universes, ships are measured by tonnage, and tonnage doesn't refer to mass as it refers to internal volume in cubic meters, and the only mention of tonnage in Halo is in The Fall of Reach when it stated how the Halcyon was 1/3 the tonnage of the Marathon, which makes the Marathon appx. 1.7km, however because the Halcyon is a bulkier ship, the Marathon should really be larger, but for the aforementioned reasons we chose to scale the ship exactly as I have portrayed it above. I could really go on as to why we scaled these ships the way we did, but I think it's clear you will simply not be satisfied until things are exactly as you want them.

Which is unfortunate, we here at HSI are really trying to do our best to provide the best, which sometimes involves countermanding popular perception. Remember that Bungie itself was quick to override it's own established canon when they felt it would serve their next installments better.

Reply Good karma+2 votes
880Zero
880Zero - - 2,557 comments

Because length = mass. Brilliant.

Also you forgot to add the Covenant Destroyer.

Reply Good karma Bad karma-3 votes
RINGLEADER Author
RINGLEADER - - 358 comments

I'm pretty sure I never said mass = length. Tonnage refers to internal volume in cubic meters. Please, if you must respond to everything you don't like, at least take the liberty of actually reading the comments you respond to before responding to them. It will save me time not having to restate the same thing.

Also, we've already stated we wouldn't be using Halo Wars material, so please stop asking about it.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
880Zero
880Zero - - 2,557 comments

I know that but you said you based the length for the Marathon off the gross tonnage compared to the Halcyon cruiser. So my assumption was that your basis of making the Marathon larger was because of the added tonnage with a length ratio.

The Covenant Destroyer was in Halo: The Fall of Reach, Halo: Ghosts of Onyx, Halo: The Cole Protocol, The Impossible Life and the Possible Death of Preston J. Cole, and if you count it, Halo Legends. Captain Keyes destroyed one using the Keyes Loop at the battle of Sigma Octanus IV. It wasn't just in Halo Wars.

And it's not that I don't like what you're doing, I'm just trying to understand the basis of what you're doing and so far I am gathering lots of information.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
RINGLEADER Author
RINGLEADER - - 358 comments

Yes but again, tonnage refers to internal volume and not mass. It's not just the assumption that the cruisers get heavier when they get longer/larger, we can open the ship meshes in a modeling program and find out exactly how much volume each one occupies which allows us to scale them accordingly.

Also, we're going to add A Covenant destroyer, just not the one featured in Halo Wars.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
880Zero
880Zero - - 2,557 comments

Alright, sounds good. I can't wait to see the modeled Destroyer.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Webzlinger
Webzlinger - - 144 comments

Awww. Too bad. Would have loved to see the Spirit of Fire.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Dragon492
Dragon492 - - 257 comments

im sorry :( i think i said somthin about the halo destroyer....take it as i hadnt got to this one yet :S

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
The_Viscount
The_Viscount - - 155 comments

Wait isn't the assault carrier like three miles long? And the smac, isn't it larger than a cruiser? This scale confuses me. I thought most covie ships were several times the size of their human counterparts...

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
RINGLEADER Author
RINGLEADER - - 358 comments

Fortunately we provided our explanation in the update, before you asked this question.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
The_Viscount
The_Viscount - - 155 comments

I read the description, I'm just saying it goes against my preconcieved notions.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
880Zero
880Zero - - 2,557 comments

Basing Keyship measurements off of screenshots from Halo 3 is pointless because you don't know the depth perception of the CCS-class Battlecruisers in relationship to the Keyship.

But with no specific length to go with, it is hard to get a good measurement of the size of the ship.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
RINGLEADER Author
RINGLEADER - - 358 comments

Well, since the CCS cruisers are revolving around the Keyship, we figure averaging out the lengths of the two ships at the near and far sides would give us a rough approximation.

Here's another view:

Ascendantjustice.com

Even if we can't get exact measurements, we can probably assume it's not 14km tall.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
Atheris7
Atheris7 - - 91 comments

You may as well listen to the people, going by eye/game models isn't really an excuse when you have the measurements right there in the books.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
RINGLEADER Author
RINGLEADER - - 358 comments

Listen to the people in regards to what ship?

Reply Good karma+1 vote
880Zero
880Zero - - 2,557 comments

I think ViperVenom is talking about the Halcyon and the Marathon.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
RINGLEADER Author
RINGLEADER - - 358 comments

Ah, well, in the books, it mentions that the Marathon is triple the tonnage of the Halcyon, while the eye/ingame measurements and the corresponding Halo: Encyclopedia entry place them at nearly the same size, with the Marathon being slightly smaller in size then the Halcyon, so I suppose that makes sense. I was just confused when he said "listen to the people" because as far as I knew, I was the only one that thought the TFOR measurement was the only reasonable one.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
880Zero
880Zero - - 2,557 comments

Sorry to bring this up again but I did some more research on the Marathon. It is labeled in the Halo Encyclopedia as being 1,190 meters long while having more tonnage than the Halcyon because of it's thick Titanium-A layer. The Marathon has way more armor plating than the Halcyon.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
V3LO
V3LO - - 1,887 comments

The halcyon/marathon issue is an error that needs to be retconned, but they're too busy retconning the actual good stuff.

The problem stems from the fact the Marathon in Halo 2 wasn't meant to be the Marathon, it was meant to be an updated Halcyon, as well as the length issue which was badly addressed. The marathon is slightly longer, but due to it's design it's not got as much width or height as the Halcyon. In this scenario, the Halcyon would be far heavier not only just because of the size, but because the Halcyon is basically a giant block of honey-comb titanium A girders, which would be far, far heavier than any externally mounted plates of titanium on the Marathon.

RL's compromise is sensible, bungie should have come to the same conclusion a while ago instead of letting it go unaddressed for so long.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
chakotay02
chakotay02 - - 591 comments

What are the two bottom things next to that gas mine? Beneath the MAC platform and the Forerunner Dreadnought.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
RINGLEADER Author
RINGLEADER - - 358 comments

The Forerunner Sentinel wall seen in Halo 2, and the aircraft carrier seen in the Halo 3 Mythic map 'Longshore'.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
davo001
davo001 - - 1,414 comments

could he not make it the size he wants. since, you know, it is his mod.
if you dont like it you can make your own :]

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
consomcubso14
consomcubso14 - - 19 comments

i think making making the marathon bigger stops the 2 ships from looking overly similar

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
blahman919
blahman919 - - 9 comments

Halo.wikia.com
Theres a scale from halo wiki

Reply Good karma Bad karma0 votes
Webzlinger
Webzlinger - - 144 comments

This might help.

Halo.wikia.com

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
RINGLEADER Author
RINGLEADER - - 358 comments

Zlinger, please read the image description.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
Post a comment

Your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community. Or sign in with your social account:

Description

Loftus scale chart, but more realistic, and cooler because it's inverted