Comments - Kijuta

"We focus on getting the attention of new gamers as well by making some innovations". Like using someone else's made engine and only making an awful story to go with it right? well that's got me sold for 5$!!

Oh wait i only enjoy a retro game made by someone that actually makes an effort to make the game.. It's obnoxious how many people use a corny RPG maker and expect to be considered an actual developer... "This game aims to revive nostalgic moments for good old RPG fanatics (such as Chrono Trigger, Final Fantasy 3" ya those were made by REAL DEVELOPERS that actually made the game and were skilled at it, they didnt use some easymode path to try and get recognition..

It's disheartening seeing how many shallow "wannabe's" do this on desura. Specially considering they use the big names as if that alone makes them adequate enough to the professional's when you're not REMOTELY near that, what soooo ever. and yes if you claim it will bring "nostalgic moments" you're claiming it CAN be as good as those games.. WHEW... that's the end of my rant.. that is untill i see the next person that uses an rpg maker and tries to claim that it's on par with classic games that grew the gaming industry to where it is today.. what a joke..

i couldn't care less if my grammar isn't perfect, i said the truth nothing more or less(obviously my opinion about the story... is an opinion)... end of story..

lets use RPG maker and make tacky pieces of **** for 20 bucks a pop and compare our poorly made game to highly priced games that have REAL devolpers. GOGOGOGO!!

Holy **** Katana... try reading what my "rant" was actually about?. This game DOES NOT COMPARE WITH ACTUAL DEVOLPERS. You know, the ones that actually create the engine and the great art that goes with it? If you or a "Dev" that only uses RPG maker to make his poorly made games takes offense to that... then enjoy living the bubble you live in... ****ing ridiculous.

Love how you just SCREAMED my point about common sense not being common. yeesh.. not sure why i came back to reply to that obnoxious comment..

UGH can't say enough how insanely dumb that comment is, considering how poorly made this game looks(tacky as it gets really). And i don't need to pay an obnoxious amount for a bad game to say whats painfully obvious about it.

I'd be more polite about it but people like ThyDamin are insanely common and are becoming more so over time. It's truly depressing being i WANT dev's like this to make an actual effort instead of slapping together a "classic rpg" from an RPG maker and expecting old school fans to just throw money at it. People that made money from classic rpg's made A REAL EFFORT to make it a good game, weird idea i know...

There is NO constructive criticism for someone that wants to create a game like this other then saying try being original and making A REAL EFFORT. lawd o mighty.... what the **** happened to common sense being common, UGH :( *whine* thats the end of my rant...

I'd say i don't want anyone to be offended by my comments but there is no polite way of saying how dumb someone is unless you want to sugar coat it to where its not the truth..

hope we get steam keys, starting to assume we wont though. :( *whine*

you guys ever think about adding in a bigger multiplayer map? like 3v3, 3 players protecting 1 large ship with their own resources to use on their ships they send out. but they all 3 have to work together, as in send ships at the same time upgrade the mother ship etc etc. i just think that would majorly add to the multiplayer. im sure that would be a metric ton of code. just felt like i had to say it hehe. would be pretty epic imo if this game had an option for that. 2v2 even

would love to enjoy the demo, but no matter what i do i cant get around the red screen error that doesnt seem to be covered in any of the forums(for me its happening only if im sending troops to attack and ending the turn, happens RIGHT after that).. found a couple of cases of it happening to someone else but there wasnt an answer for either of them..

I use windows 7, nvidia gtx 460 and plenty of memory.. already checked out whats recommended for this software wise as well(basic as it gets too...), it doesnt make sense that im getting such a game breaking error from a 30$ indie game.. and it's past alpha?.. would of felt like an idiot spending 30$ on something that came out in 2006 and finding out i still have to deal with that.. so thanks for the demo at least... other then that game breaking issue, honestly seemed great.. 30$ great?... mmm.. no. even with out the red screen... but thats obviously just my opinion.. apart from the whining about the price i dont want to seem like im just ranting but that is a game breaking issue to try and play with. moving on now :p

though its a common fad atm, still an awesome game had to buy it :). Ive noticed when you change weapon modes or whatever that is in the bottom right (did it on accident) that options in the encounter change and nothing is there :(. im sure it will be fixed though as it is beta hehe

anyway custom keys will be added? i can't stand using w a s d keys to move.... otherwise, ugh :( so much for playing it...

Bombs shouldn't be able to pass through an enemy player while you're literally RIGHT on them or damn close and not take a scratch... ffs the explosion is bigger then a player by what 3x?.. and the shield you hold out is barely bigger then half your body?... that doesn't add up.. and I'm sure the ones that get off on using those kind of means to feel like you got one up on someone wont agree what so ever... can't imagin why that would be.. The bombs shouldn't be able to be thrown through a player at the least. Preferably that and if you're close to it holding your shield should half the damage not make you immune to the explosion.... It's ****ing dumb how people are using those bombs.. UGH.. seriously sucks how its becoming more and more common.. but hey who cares for proper competition right?... yeesh... had to rant a comment about it, sorry for my awful grammar..