Comments - Wheaton_Adams

That's actually proper to each fighter jet's config file in the game, and, you can override it in the options menu any time. Sorry for the uberlate reply @.@

IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ:

As of 07/31/15, the official Incubator build of VT now has a change regarding missile behavior that very closely resembles that of this mod.
Since it is now officially in-game, rather than a mod, I invite everyone who supported this mod to switch to the Incubator build rather than keeping on using this.
You don't need this mod any longer, switch to Incubator! It's now changed officially in-game! MSSLs actually hit in the non-modded game now!

Please note that in no case I altered SP missile performance, only the "default weapon" stock missiles, the "MSSL". For SP weapons, nothing's been changed on purpose. As for MIRV... I think nobody's done it before... Maybe for a reason. I don't know.

No, I'm not sure this is what's happening. The problem is that so many people see VT as an AC succcessor, and expect their experience and play style to translate from AC to VT eaasily enough, except the missiles do not follow that pattern, but everything else does. It's frustrating to feel like you're playing ace combat and have fun and all, until you realize the missiles miss too easily because they work off of era-based realistic behavior. In AC, all planes from all time eras have MSSLs that behave the same way, and it's the craft's performances that are important; here with this mod, if you're using an old or new fighter, in both cases, the SAME situation will give the SAME results in terms of MSSL performances. Not different based off of the age of the missiles.

He fears missiles will behave like in ACAH: They play the game for you. Which isn't the case.

Some people just don't like how firing two missiles at a target where in AC it would connect, but here, it would miss. And I understand that.

Due to designed parity between the player and the AI which is beyondd my control, yes. In battle scenario / multiplayer / skirmish, damage at at 1:1 scale in both ways, but in campaigns, it can be altered.

Allright. So in essence, besides the tools being self-contained to LA's SDK, the scripting techniques / acdc are still the same?

I apologize in advance for asking a potentially stupid or risky question, but, is the SDK able to alter existing levels? I'm not sure .level files existed in the normal Stalker architecture.

I wonder if in theory, it's possible to add a new area entirely and link it with a 2-way warp point within the Zone? o.o

Normally, if you copypaste a plane's folder with the .ini alone in a matching architecture within the campaign folder, the game will use that .ini instead, removing the need to alter the originals in Objects/Aircraft/ . But last time I checked, only some informations are overwritten ( such as the [Data] and [Info] blocks ), and it sadly doesn't include weapons... Needs to be fixed...

My bad!! D: Thanks for pointing that out.

Rain? Allright, I knew this was going to happen eventually! :p

An absolute necessity. Nothing like this "Boom" to signal that we made a hit. 10/10 :).

Excellent quality o.o I'm pretty sure it will please AC04 fans : D

It was about time this happened. time to end your supremacy, Idolmaster.

Xpand, are you even human, making stuff so good and so fast? O.O Great great great job... o.o

Pixenli.com

Both models are in similar size; and I can guarantee you that they are to scale as well in the game itself. Put any craft next to the R-103 in the mission editor, and you'll see. I'm not trying to prove you wrong, it's just that only in the hangar, the camera is further away, it's not a scaling issue. Why this happens though, I have on clue :/.

I ported that thing and the problem remains the same even though the scaling issue is of a different "scale" entirely. I have absolutely no clue why this is happening and I was never able to get a correct answer from TS about that.

The quality of these paint jobs is just excellent. My favorite goes to the Red Falcons. Looks the best, in my opinion.

I'm perfectly fine with it. Someone I learned a lot from said that people who try to control and restrict use/access to their work do not know what art is about. And I think he was right ^.^

The Forneus also had a COFFIN-embbeded compass too, it was just less noticeable :).

Whenever I wanted to test the thing out, I discovered that using an F-15, a Sukhoi or anything fast but noticeable had it lock-on to me pretty easily. In return, using an F-117 made it a breeze, so, no, it's playing fair against stealth fighters.

Now that I think about it... Did the Lampyridae ever had any flight action outside of this game?

I really like the trails on this one.

As far as I know, there already are. Look up for older news, where the "Ziz" is featured :Y. I guess there's more than the Ziz at this point, though.

I spy ACZ + AC04 References.

I made it yesterday :V.

Looks familiar. :).

Something i've been wondering for quite some time, yet never asked clearly: It seems the GUI/HUD can now be recoloured, right?
Is it using presets such as cyan & purple, or are the HUD elements now recoloured using RGB values that we can change in the game's settings?

would this post's icon in the news list happen to be an airliner?

If there's one in the final game, i will soooooo remake AC Joint Assault's mission where we must fly it through a canyon with a noisy passenger.

I would have tried to figure this out myself if I ever knew how TS implemented trees in the first place.