This modification offers an alternative gameplay to Tiberian Wars involving many Tiberian Sun units which many CnC fans (like me) missing in vanilla CNC3 and add even new my made units which you can't find anywhere else. Story is quite the same like Tiberian Wars, but is all about what if GDI and Nod do not abandon technologies they have used in Tiberian Sun era and instead of that further developed them. But it's not only that, there are many visual, sound and balance changes which I want to see and hear in my mod, new sounds, new music, new effects (like blood and gore, new infantry deaths, new more realistic missile trails) and many more.

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
Report RSS Tiberium Essence 1.5 (view original)
Tiberium Essence 1.5
embed
share
view previous next
Share Image
Share on Facebook Post Email a friend
Embed Image
Post comment Comments
justgoaway
justgoaway - - 8,208 comments

Extra armor? Interesting...

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Carnius Author
Carnius - - 1,354 comments

Yes, some people called for better armor for mlrs, because its too week on t3 vs things like devastator warship and i feel the same. This upgrade should fix that. However, everything might change during betatest.

Reply Good karma+4 votes
TXcommander
TXcommander - - 271 comments

the overall is better.but is the cannon too big ?

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Kashano
Kashano - - 67 comments

I disagree. It looks better than it was.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Cabal/Legion
Cabal/Legion - - 628 comments

yeah lets see how things go with it as with and without armour upgrade cause im looking forawrd to try that out

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Smallchange
Smallchange - - 2,108 comments

NICE!!

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Relifed
Relifed - - 1,112 comments

AWESOME :D nice new name :)

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Нunter-Seeker
Нunter-Seeker - - 1,373 comments

New model is much better!

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
playmsbk
playmsbk - - 2,388 comments

extra armor? nice, could use some more fancy name though :D

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Carnius Author
Carnius - - 1,354 comments

Sure, any suggestions?

Reply Good karma+2 votes
playmsbk
playmsbk - - 2,388 comments

bartjo said: ceramic armor, other suggestions by me:

reactive armor En.wikipedia.org (for both heavy and light ones)

composite armor En.wikipedia.org (if its light vehicle only)

cage armor: decreases the amount of damage taken from the front and the back En.wikipedia.org

i d choose ceramic or composite if i were u

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
nose-bLeed
nose-bLeed - - 1,077 comments

carbon fibre armor. (lighter but stronger than steel)

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Carnius Author
Carnius - - 1,354 comments

I like reactive armor, specialy Electric reactive armour - that is future.

So it will be reactive armor with electric reactive armor description.

Reply Good karma+2 votes
Yanivvv
Yanivvv - - 483 comments

composite rulezz LOL

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Bartjo
Bartjo - - 111 comments

ceramic armour maybe?

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
APB_ICE
APB_ICE - - 1,245 comments

Nah, ceramic armour is standard now

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Madin
Madin - - 2,077 comments

This is very nice!

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
ZeroXstaR
ZeroXstaR - - 2 comments

the MRLS is too cheap in 1.4
and it's Rocket is too strong that it can kill any T1 TANK before return fire

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
master_oli-p
master_oli-p - - 1,462 comments

big turret, but looks cool non-the-less

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Kashano
Kashano - - 67 comments

Cool!

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
AbsolutePr00f
AbsolutePr00f - - 96 comments

love it

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Tehkrad
Tehkrad - - 118 comments

SWEEET :D

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Alucard_Sn1p3r87
Alucard_Sn1p3r87 - - 822 comments

Could you give it slightly more range than the one in 1.4? as for long range weapon it's range isn't all that much longer than the titan. And often does the enemy just aim straight for the MRLS, which can only take a few hits.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
8Waldemar8
8Waldemar8 - - 243 comments

its stupid to give it an armour apgrade.Its a lite.it isnt a tank. It has enother tactic.

Reply Good karma Bad karma0 votes
ilic_stefan
ilic_stefan - - 98 comments

It looks cool. The armor upgrade is nice thing, now GDI has some formidable tool for Scrin air units, you probably know that moment when you build 2-3 of them and they get destroyed by 2 devastators.

Nice thing, really. Also what do you think of changing its name, tempest reminds me of something big, it would suit more to a Scrin unit. I read on wikipedia that it represents storm. What do you think of Hurricane or other stuff, I don't have idea right now, but I know that tempest might not be the appropriate name.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Rhadez
Rhadez - - 239 comments

Much better!

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
bosnian_dragon
bosnian_dragon - - 190 comments

I don't want to be annoying, but you mistyped the title of this unit.
MRLS is the correct abbreviation for "Multiple Rocket Launching System".

Anyways, it's a really good unit :) Thumbs up!

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
maxcheese3
maxcheese3 - - 203 comments

I always thought it was "Mobile Rocket Launching System"

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
MaverikCH
MaverikCH - - 33 comments

hm, its a hovercraft. why not just give the ability to hover over water?

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
iheartmods
iheartmods - - 46 comments

It should be given a machine gun as a side weapon for use against infantry.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Blak-Dragon
Blak-Dragon - - 168 comments

I never saw the Extra Armor upgrade available. Or is that for the new 1.5 ? Aside of the Juggernaut, maybe MRLS could also use a bombardment feature to shower a target area with rockets ?

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Post a comment

Your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community. Or sign in with your social account: