Revamp Expansion Mod (RVE) A Supreme Commander 2 Complete Overhaul / Total Conversion Mod
Tera Fortress
(view original)
Post a comment
Revamp Expansion Mod (RVE) A Supreme Commander 2 Complete Overhaul / Total Conversion Mod
It's so beautiful... I almost shed a manly tear.
Just one?
DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMNNNN!I want this, I WANT IT NOW!
Damn you! You just made me buy the one game i've been avoiding for so long..
Looks like the AC Terror and the Armored fortress had a crazy night
so terror fortress is on it's way now? sir..
Personally I think it needs more guns... but that's just me ^_^
I agree, it definitely needs more guns.
> More DAKKKKA
WAAARGH!
It should be red
CUZ DA RED WUNZ GO FASTAH
Can we get some vertical launch missile tubes on the top? Maybe a tactical nuclear artillery piece?
and the ability to call down rainbow colored orbital laser strikes that do 20% damage per second, with a sky blue explosion and make it drop apple bombs that have a lasso abilities
its a joke. ofc there isnt gonna be a tactical nuclear cannon on this. we do not need a mobile mavor elite, let alone a flying version with fortress armor and battleship class guns.
Shame, just when i was hoping for a dual 120mm minigun artillery tank attached to a flying horse that ***** rainbow nukes with a speed of 2500 nukes per minute
>All that dakka
I want one, now.
Looks greate,but the texture on the "rotors" looks like Disneyland carousel which make it look less serious.
they look better when there spinning ;)
40k thuderhawk on steriods! Dropping off a fatboy
Oh yeah! Finally something to kick Mothership's curvy fat @$$!
lol, Mothership is nothing but curves :p
IT gets the nod of manly men all over the world
eh, the bridge could look a little more "bridgy"
There is no bridge... its a robot.
mmmh, what about the mega fortress? the cybran aircraft carrier.....they have bridge-like stuff. so do all the boats. when you finally do naval units, will you take away the best part of a ship? even if they are just drones, why remove one of the best cool factors for sake of authenticity yet you give it a roll cage like its half epic gunship half dune buggy....i LOVE the look of reinforcement bars but lets be honest, for sake of authenticity, it doesnt really need them.
for one, its an AIRCRAFT which will never touch the ground and definitely wont play fortress derby...
two, if it isnt a roll cage and/or doesnt serve the same purpose, why expose the frame? if you say they are for structural integrity, that would imply they are either part of the frame or serve as external reinforcements of some kind which it does not need, especially considering nothing will hit it but bullets.
four, it may have a core which serves as a "brain" that can use small hidden cameras but putting the main sensory stuff on the front is like putting a giant eye on the front of a ratte. the eye becomes the weakest point in its armor. and its totally obvious where to shoot. why have the "face" at all when it apparently doesnt need a bridge?
fifth, for authenticity, ALL the units should have the abilities of an amphibious NEXT from armored core 4. (for reference to how stupid it would all be)
finally, if it really is just a drone, the only difference between the cybrans and the other factions is that the cybran units each have a legitimate brain wired into their circuitry.
i dont want all the units to move like flies and i dont want to get rid of the reinforcement bars, but the bridge is one of the coolest things on giant vehicles.
I Always add a small "bridge" but its only where sensors are housed, nothing more, I see the reinforcement bars on UEF units as added protection against falling/flying debris and shrapnel, from explosions and stuff.
you must not like the bridge part of ships then....
will naval units have bridges at least?
No, I like the bridge part...
Haha this guy
it definitely need square-ish UEF engine pods. these turbines look odd.
P.S. finally! UEF Soulripper!
This comment is currently awaiting admin approval, join now to view.