Revamp Expansion Mod (RVE) The Ultimate Supreme Commander 2 Experience (New Scale, New Units, New Ability's, New Game)

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
Media RSS Feed Report media Cybran Land XP unit stat chart (view original)
Cybran Land XP unit stat chart
embed
share
view previous next
 
Post comment Comments  (0 - 50 of 97)
Res_Novae
Res_Novae Nov 18 2012, 8:06pm says:

I can't wait to wield this cybernetic arsenal against my enemies.

+7 votes     reply to comment
WarStalkeR
WarStalkeR Nov 20 2012, 11:50am replied:

Worry not, UEF won't fall back :)

Very second I seen that Monkeylord MkII is Stealth Bot, I understood that fate of most battles is decided if somebody forgets about radars :)

+1 vote     reply to comment
Maecgeifer
Maecgeifer Nov 25 2012, 1:17pm replied:

I just hope that the Illuminate wont fall back either

+1 vote     reply to comment
drillz007
drillz007 Dec 10 2012, 6:43pm replied:

we can only hope the they balance it out i know they say their not going to but if its cant balance out the cybrans ho!

+1 vote     reply to comment
Igncom1
Igncom1 Nov 18 2012, 8:40pm says:

Whats the difference between an assault and siege unit?

+1 vote     reply to comment
leosake
leosake Nov 18 2012, 9:16pm replied:

Assault means that it is used offensively and aggressively... this unit will favor speed and mobility with decent firepower, to be played aggressively...

Siege unit, doesn't need speed, because it is used to withstand tons of punishment, and lead a siege for other units to do the actuall "work", which means that this unit, will have lots of health, it will move slowly etc etc...

+2 votes     reply to comment
nuketf
nuketf Nov 18 2012, 8:50pm says:

MONKAYLORD!!!!! P.S why is it called that? :P it looks like a spider kind of but i love building them in supcom 1 then haveing them mass attack the foe base haaa the good old Over power expermantals

+2 votes     reply to comment
Wraithlord_Zeratul
Wraithlord_Zeratul Nov 18 2012, 9:31pm says:

sweet mother of mercy...

wait, why Wyverm is called a game ender?

if that's the case, then UEF and Illuminate game ender is what?

+2 votes     reply to comment
leosake
leosake Nov 18 2012, 9:44pm replied:

I have already stated...do some research before asking these questions...
Illuminate counterpart is the Archangel..the UEF one is either the Annihilator or the Juggernaut ;)

+1 vote     reply to comment
videogamelover
videogamelover Jan 26 2013, 9:28pm replied:

cause it can shoot the crap out of everything

+1 vote     reply to comment
MrAzuryZ
MrAzuryZ Feb 4 2013, 1:40pm replied:

The Archangel :3
Hehe..

+1 vote     reply to comment
Rtys8
Rtys8 Nov 19 2012, 12:09am says:

Dang, looks like the balance of the previous game is gone now.

Cybran land units being more powerful than UEF? I thought they were all rounders in exchange for build rate and lower build costs.

Aeon better be the most powerful,yet the most expensive and the longest of the 3 to build.But that effort will be worth it to overpower the opposition.

+2 votes     reply to comment
leosake
leosake Nov 19 2012, 1:59am replied:

I don't recall Megalith not being powerful... I don't recall Soul-Ripper I not being powerful...With 4 Soul-Rippers I could pown anything....
And keep in mind, UEF XP's had sheer amounts of health or survivability or range, not damage ;)

+1 vote     reply to comment
Rtys8
Rtys8 Nov 19 2012, 2:10am says:

Whoops, i forgot UEF were better at soft stats.Silly me for forgetting.DMG seems too obvious a stat.

But still, you better make em balanced.
UEF's strengths at being tenacious and having range become obsolete late game.Just not so bad they can get pwned in a few seconds.

And PLEASE,make the new fatboys barrage actually hurt against another xp.(Long term, sustained fire that is.)
I remember if you were smart enough,with enough fatboys, you can kite around and wear down stronger experimentals.

(Excluding tactical buildings,that's their real strength.)

+1 vote     reply to comment
leosake
leosake Nov 19 2012, 3:36am replied:

Don't worry about Fatboy...It's Avitus's favorite so It will be powerful :P
Now as for the XPs everything will be balanced don't worry, each XP will have its flaw/weak point...
If you've noticed even the Dragon that dishes extreme amounts of damage, is extremely slow and has small range(which means prone to kiting) ;)

+1 vote     reply to comment
IMAZOMBIE358
IMAZOMBIE358 Nov 19 2012, 5:08pm replied:

dragon is flying and should be fast and fast rate of fire.

id say the avitus and dragon have switched stats.

-3 votes     reply to comment
leosake
leosake Nov 19 2012, 7:59pm replied:

the dragon is not flying...we have already stated why...and I remember you have commented on it also... -.-

+1 vote     reply to comment
IMAZOMBIE358
IMAZOMBIE358 Nov 20 2012, 9:54am replied:

hey dont get upset man. you guys posted the stats so we could say whether we like them or not. im saying why i dont like them and would like to know your idea of why it should be that so i can better understand why. that IS why you guys posted this isnt it?

in almost every image, you guys ask so what do you think?

the way you see it, your asking if you like it, say why, if you dont, shut the **** up.

-2 votes     reply to comment
Avitus12
Avitus12 Nov 19 2012, 4:08am says:

@ all
the stats on this chart are not to be compared to the UEF chart only other Cybran XPs and it is all subject to change.

+2 votes     reply to comment
Dutchygamer
Dutchygamer Nov 19 2012, 5:42am says:

So the Dragon is now known as Wyvern? Tbh Dragon sounds more intimidating =/

0 votes     reply to comment
Hollownerox
Hollownerox Nov 19 2012, 6:00am replied:

Wyvern is just another name for dragon, technically a different type of dragon that is specifically English. But if there is a need for a name change there are plenty of mythological dragon names to go around. For example Fafner, Jörmungandr, Typhon, Tiamat, there's a whole list here En.wikipedia.org

+3 votes     reply to comment
leosake
leosake Nov 19 2012, 8:55am replied:

Tiamat I think sounds awesome...

+1 vote     reply to comment
Res_Novae
Res_Novae Nov 25 2012, 3:42am replied:

I believe I actually suggested Tiamat before.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Rtys8
Rtys8 Nov 19 2012, 7:09am says:

Ah since we are on the topic of the UEF,i raise back my previous request/query.

They need an Heavy Tank/Siege Weapon archetype.Or is that the Juggernaut?

The reason why they got the King Kriptor was because outside the fatboy,all they had was a support fire XP incapable of taking down a Monkeylord or a Galactic Colossus 1v1.

They need something like the Storm Strider.

+1 vote     reply to comment
leosake
leosake Nov 19 2012, 8:56am replied:

We're not in the UEF topic....post that on the UEF chart..Discuss the Cybran stuff here please...

+1 vote     reply to comment
IMAZOMBIE358
IMAZOMBIE358 Nov 19 2012, 5:06pm replied:

reason hes doing that here is because ppl pay more attention to the current. thus, better chance for ppl to respond to his comment. i think its a great idea. i still have unanswered questions on the shredder video.

-1 votes     reply to comment
narh...
narh... Nov 19 2012, 10:42am says:

Will u guys make an Aeon chart soon pls :)

+2 votes     reply to comment
Avitus12
Avitus12 Nov 19 2012, 11:22am replied:

Yer we could make an Aeon chart but it would be incomplete at this point in time.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Rtys8
Rtys8 Nov 19 2012, 11:42am says:

Hmm i hope they are planned as least, if they dont have models yet.

+1 vote     reply to comment
yavuztezcan
yavuztezcan Nov 19 2012, 11:59am says:

Awesome! no other words needed

+1 vote     reply to comment
VOLKSCULT
VOLKSCULT Nov 19 2012, 12:18pm says:

Awesome work !!!!

At this point i have a question:

I think you know the thing i mean, when you have build many monkeylords and you move them to a waypoint and when they reach it, the monkeys make funny things with dere legs like fidget around wile they stay at the same place.Galactic Colossus or King the same. I mean that look very stupit in my opinion. Have you ever think about this before to fix this "bug"?? Or is there no way to fix it?

0 votes     reply to comment
IMAZOMBIE358
IMAZOMBIE358 Nov 19 2012, 3:07pm replied:

it isnt a bug. its supposed to make them seem alive. breathing. i persnonally think they would look quite stupid just sitting there still. the designers did that to make them seem more awar of their surroundings.

no, in actuality, only cybran units would fidget because they are cybernetic. pretty much just a brain hooked up to a bunch of cords. itd get pretty damn boring just sitting there for hours, waiting for your commander to tell you to go to battle.

the uef moving? they make them seem alive probably to make the commander feel not so alone. remember, with uef, the only living thing on the battlefield is the pilot sitting in the acu. it would also be efficient to keep them moving to prevent the joints from settling. its a lot easier to move if your standing and moving a little than to get up and move after sitting for a long time. itd be like having to stretch. they wouldnt stretch, but if they move suddenly after standing for a long time, it might actually do some damage to the internals.

the aeon? aeon units are probably ai driven like the uef.

+1 vote     reply to comment
leosake
leosake Nov 19 2012, 4:22pm replied:

all ACU's have pilots on them....
and what you're describing is the idle animation..

+1 vote     reply to comment
IMAZOMBIE358
IMAZOMBIE358 Nov 19 2012, 5:01pm replied:

yeah, and i like to put reason behind things that i like. and i do know that all acus have pilots.

+1 vote     reply to comment
IMAZOMBIE358
IMAZOMBIE358 Nov 19 2012, 4:43pm says:

um.....the wyverns stats arent what they should be. its a flying unit isnt it? it should be the fastest of them all.

it should have the highest rate of fire and speed and regen

with average health and damage. it surely shouldnt be the game ender. the most powerful and costly unit should be a spider or insect like for cybran because that is their main idea. id think the avitus would be the game ender. or the monkeylord or storm strider at least.

for the dragon to be a game ender, it would need to be huge very detailed.

would it be possible to put the annihilator in game with its original high poly count?

damn...imagine supcom with the frostbite 2 engine....damn...

the new cnc online is using it.

-2 votes     reply to comment
IMAZOMBIE358
IMAZOMBIE358 Nov 19 2012, 5:36pm says:

why isnt the kraken on there? it was an awesome project. have avitus work on it if you cant think of any way to improve it. NO OFFENSE

and sorry about complaining about things being under detailed. ive been watching zoids lately so everything on here looks way under detailed.

-2 votes     reply to comment
Igncom1
Igncom1 Nov 19 2012, 6:53pm replied:

Well the title is 'Cybran Land XP unit stat chart'.

So don't worry buddy, kraken will be kickass because the modders are kickass.

+4 votes     reply to comment
leosake
leosake Nov 19 2012, 8:04pm replied:

First of all, you speak too much...
Secondly, offense is taken...no matter your statement...
Thirdly, the Dragon is way much more detailed than you think it is....
Fourthly, it is the iconic model of Cybran up to now, with the biggest fan-base...
Now....as far as the Kraken is concerned, I told you, the project is just paused...navy will be done later...

+1 vote     reply to comment
IMAZOMBIE358
IMAZOMBIE358 Nov 20 2012, 10:23am replied:

i talk a lot because i have a lot to say. just to let you know, no good man ever says he is better than anyone in any way. i learned that a long time ago. telling me that i speak to much is an insult isnt it? thats a put down. thats saying you are better than I.

i meant what i said as in hey man dont just throw it in the trash if you ever think of scrapping it. maybe avitus can help out. he helped out with the dragon.

i think it should not be the iconic cybran unit because even their aircraft carrier and megalith are more detailed than it. http://www.google.com/imgres?um=1&hl=en&sa=N&tbo=d&biw=1024&bih=653&tbm=isch&tbnid=krRtk57v_Y6dRM:&imgrefurl=http://supcom2.wikia.com/wiki/Command_Class_Aircraft_Carrier&docid=FhWogw5deEfJjM&imgurl=http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110411031355/supcom2/images/b/b7/Command_Class.png&w=1184&h=713&ei=c52rUJHTIcnDyQHduYCgBA&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=356&vpy=307&dur=855&hovh=174&hovw=289&tx=179&ty=101&sig=109793798897943007323&page=3&tbnh=157&tbnw=272&start=36&ndsp=20&ved=1t:429,r:48,s:0,i:224

even the old salem has more details. http://supcom2.wikia.com/wiki/Executioner_Class_Battleship

even the dragons predecessor has more details. even the titan!
http://supcom2.wikia.com/wiki/Executioner_Class_Battleship

look at all the lines! go through that and look back at the dragon. its too smooth. give it some nice grooves and stuff like that.

and okay. i ask about the kraken a lot because i really like it. like every other thing a talk a lot about. i talk on here because what i can do is very limited.

-1 votes     reply to comment
leosake
leosake Nov 20 2012, 6:49pm replied:

Okey, I'm going to answer on this debacle for one final time, and then I call it a day on my side...if you still want to continue this conversation, you will do it without me...
now let's get to the point, I haven't insulted you, in any way, I have just STATED something that was obvious....I didn't said if this was good or bad...I just said that you do talk too much...and you do...
now, back to the point, this dragon WAS made by Avitus, so he has already helped himself on it...
I MYSELF cannot find the models you provided more 'detailed" as you say (which as a matter of fact, don't even know what you mean with the word "detailed")...
The fact that you're bashing about the "details" on models, is plainly ignorant... you haven't even defiend what detailed is, and PLEASE don't let it be the poly-count, because if it is you've already lost your groundings...
that is all that I had to say.... If you really want to continue about the model not being "detailed" enough, I think the best one to answer you is Avitus....I'm giving up with this case....

+1 vote     reply to comment
IMAZOMBIE358
IMAZOMBIE358 Nov 21 2012, 5:15am replied:

whats bad about talking too much? you wouldnt be saying that if the things i said were all good things that i like.

and now that i think of it, yes it is indeed the poly count. what is its poly count?

i mean detailed as in grooves like the monkeylord had on its sides and legs.a towering, massive game ender unit should look big. bigger it is, more details. more shapes, higher poly count. something that big and powerful should have barely any flat surface area. the legs mostly. and if it isnt your project, why are you answering questions ive aimed at the person who made it? i would like to discuss it with avitus. i doubt its polycount goes higher than either of the three big spiders.

i was just looking at it. ad a little more detail to the rocket racks and legs and then itl be game ender quality.

also, hows that annihilator going avitus? any chance youll be putting the avitus into a render soon?

0 votes     reply to comment
OverRated
OverRated Nov 21 2012, 5:13am replied:

IMAZOMBIE358 Please show some respect, Your talking about texture detail don't forget that Avitus does all his textures free hand and does a ******* good job of them, so comparing it to a GPG texture that has been done with texture design software is some what squid, We work with the software we have, We don't have access to ******* thousands of dollars of equipment and software.

P.S From this point on if you don't start showing respect to my team we wont be paying any more attention to you, Some of us have been working on this mod for years me one of them thats has put months of work into Revamp, And yes support does help i thanks those who have been there from the start watching, waiting and showing there support.

+4 votes     reply to comment
IMAZOMBIE358
IMAZOMBIE358 Nov 21 2012, 6:08am replied:

i am not in any way trying to put down avitus. i understand that you dont have thousands of dollars but you dont need thousands of dollars to add a few more shapes onto something. from what ive seen, what im asking avitus to do is like lifting a feather.

you guys who think you need to make gpg look bad are insulting supcom and all the rest of chris taylors work.

theres no reason to make them look bad. if it werent for them, you wouldnt be making this mod.

gpg didnt do a bad job at supcom 2. all it seriously needed was a tune up for the experimentals. i understand that you guys re going way out of your way to make this game even more awesome. thats crazy determination you all have but theres no reason to put down gpg.

and oh my god not this respect thing again...disrespecting and disagreeing are two entirely different things. and as i said befor, im am never trying to offend anyone. dont blame me because you hear everything im saying as if im angry at you or as if its a command. if you were to hear me saying what i say in real life, you all would be going a lot easier on me.

and hey i think both avitus and leosake do a great job designing units but it does indeedy say in almos every image including this one, what do you think?

+2 votes     reply to comment
OverRated
OverRated Nov 21 2012, 7:08am replied:

1st of all thanks for showing some respect in your post above that's all we ask for, None of the Revamp team think about our work as trying to show GPGs up more about correcting them were they went wrong, But you are right and wrong when saying we wouldn't be making this mod if it wasn't for them, Let me clear things up the original Revamp mod was started by me and my friend loony for 1 reason we hated how SC2 turned out and i can say most people following this mod think the same way, This game was rushed and was coded for XBOX not PC, Unlike FA were it was made for PC without no limitations holding them back, I don't put all the blame of GPG because they were rush by SE but if they really cared like they did in FA it would of been developed around the PC then ported the XBOX later but they took the cheap way out.

+3 votes     reply to comment
IMAZOMBIE358
IMAZOMBIE358 Nov 21 2012, 9:10am replied:

what? it was originally for xbox? wow...i have the xbox version... its okay... the graphics are horrible though. and no dlc.

+2 votes     reply to comment
OverRated
OverRated Nov 22 2012, 3:58am replied:

Most games are made for xbox before PC is cheaper because they don't need to worries about a PC handling a XBOX game, But there are some games that were made for PC and then ported to consoles.

+1 vote     reply to comment
IMAZOMBIE358
IMAZOMBIE358 Nov 23 2012, 2:19am replied:

you heard of universe at war? isnt it like the ONLY strategy game out there that allows xbox players to battle pc players?

0 votes     reply to comment
OverRated
OverRated Nov 23 2012, 4:13am replied:

Cross platform isn't all ways a smart idea both games need to be on pair with each other meaning the PC version will look like **** just like the console version LOL, Strategy games on consoles are a joke you cant play a RTS with out a PC.

+3 votes     reply to comment
IMAZOMBIE358
IMAZOMBIE358 Nov 23 2012, 2:39pm replied:

mmmmh the pc version looks much better in terms of graphics. i know. ive played it.

i LOVED playing strategy games on the xbox. have you ever tried? what games have you played? ive played both supcom and supcom 2, and universe at war. the only thing i dont like is the graphics. otherwise, its a nice little challenge. it actually makes things slightly easier. a few things. especially the view stuff. building units can be faster. pretty much a circle that opens when you select a unit you want to build. that and your hands are both on the same device.

0 votes     reply to comment
IANF1
IANF1 Nov 19 2012, 8:25pm says:

aww where did the centipede go? i loved the look of that thing.... btw, even though i realize this is a game limitation are you sure there isn't any way to have the tail and claws on the scorpion act independently to each other? ya know like a real mutated laser mech bug?

+1 vote     reply to comment
Post a Comment
click to sign in

You are not logged in, your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) which we encourage all contributors to do.

2000 characters limit; HTML formatting and smileys are not supported - text only

Description

Leo and I worked on this for about an hour figuring out what was best, so what do you think? :D

Image Details
Type
Entertainment
Date
Nov 18th, 2012
Size
900×2549
Options
URL
Embed (big)
Embed
Share
Report Abuse
Report media
Add Media
Members only