An expansion/overhaul mod of epic proportions, with entirely rebalanced gameplay, expanded factions, new gametypes, graphical overhauls, and five new factions; stealth-based Confederate Revolutionaries, tower defense-inspired Atomic Kingdom of China, economy-focused Mediterranean Syndicate, DotA-esque Order of the Talon and spammy Electrical Protectorate.
| Poll: Vietcong or ARVN |
| Posts | ||
|---|---|---|
| VIetcong vs ARVN | Locked | |
| Thread Options | ||
| Mar 12 2011 Anchor | ||
|
Who do you think is the better faction? Imo, I think the Vietcong is better, they have more diverse units, and the ability to slowly wipe away at the slower ARVN units. Though, I am more exited to see ARVN, because we finally get to see allied paratroopers. As for the third polling option: Wiki.paradoxmod.com |
||
|
|
Mar 12 2011 Anchor | |
|
ARVN for me, because I don't like skulking around in the bushes. I prefer flying above them! -- |
||
| Mar 12 2011 Anchor | ||
|
I'm not sure either faction is better. I can say that the Vietcong are better suited to my playstyle, but ARVN has a technological advantage. -- Efficiency is the essence of warfare. |
||
|
|
Mar 12 2011 Anchor | |
|
ARVN! What do we burn other than VC? More VC! -- Yours faithfully, That guy who does hammy stuff on a regular basis. |
||
|
|
Mar 12 2011 Anchor | |
Actually, I'm afraid you'll have to wait until after Apoc to see the Pathfinders. Though I really want to make the models; they have really cool uniforms and the Pathfinder has an insanely awesome night-vision scope. Edited by: open_sketchbook |
||
| Mar 13 2011 Anchor | ||
|
I thought the ARVN defenders were the same as the allied pathfinders, with different outfits? |
||
|
|
Mar 13 2011 Anchor | |
|
No. They are quite unique. They were going to be the same as the reservist defenders but we went for something a little different instead. |
||
|
|
Mar 13 2011 Anchor | |
Howso? -- Yours faithfully, That guy who does hammy stuff on a regular basis. |
||
|
|
Mar 16 2011 Anchor | |
|
Both are just as interesting. -- >.< |
||
| Mar 16 2011 Anchor | ||
|
ARVN. It's incredibly satisfying to root out something stealthed or hidden on the battlefield, and that is what the ARVN is designed for. |
||
| Mar 16 2011 Anchor | ||
Vietcong have units that are both extremely light and heavy whilst ARVN are the all rounders/flexible guys. ARVN is gonna eat everything! EVERYTHING! |
||
|
|
Mar 16 2011 Anchor | |
Except your Brains. Hence B.R.A.I.N.S. rox. -- >.< |
||
| Mar 16 2011 Anchor | ||
|
The ARVN can move infantry around with copters, but the vietcong can run around and skirmish very effectively, and for the heavier work, they can just use a mammoth tank. |
||
| Mar 17 2011 Anchor | ||
|
Yea but copters ignore terrain |
||
| Mar 17 2011 Anchor | ||
|
The vietcong have migs, too. In my opinion, it is more about choices when dealing with simpler warfare (one where ground factor is also economic factor). Also, mammoth tank ftw. Edited by: g.a |
||
|
|
Mar 17 2011 Anchor | |
|
neither of them would win. --
|
||
| Mar 28 2011 Anchor | ||
|
Mammoth tank spam. That is all I need to say |
||
|
|
Mar 28 2011 Anchor | |
As a reinforcement unit, so you won't see them often. -- Quick its 2am! Do you know where your base is? |
||
|
|
Apr 20 2011 Anchor | |
|
You failed. STALEMATE. You're all losers. -- >.< |
||
| Apr 21 2011 Anchor | ||
|
Actually, that was not an option, please try again. |
||
Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.