This mod is for all the players frustrated with the cartoony nature of Zero Hour units and buildings. We intend to replace every fanciful unit in Zero Hour with its closest possible real world equivalent, without changing the unit's capabilities.

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
Type-95 SPAAA
embed
share
view previous next
 
Post comment Comments
[TZP]LoNer1
[TZP]LoNer1 Dec 6 2012, 2:33pm says:

"Hot Damn!"

This is looking really nice. But, will this be the only color scheme? Also, what will it replace? QC?

+7 votes     reply to comment
HerrMisterMe
HerrMisterMe Dec 6 2012, 4:28pm replied:

The Gattling tank?

+4 votes     reply to comment
dhd
dhd Dec 6 2012, 5:40pm replied:

Yes. I'm starting to think we ought to add that sort of info into the renders here.

+3 votes     reply to comment
[TZP]LoNer1
[TZP]LoNer1 Dec 7 2012, 10:48am replied:

Yeah, haven't played ZH in the longest bit :( sorry

+2 votes     reply to comment
DEathgod65
DEathgod65 Dec 6 2012, 2:38pm says:

The turret looks a little small, I only saw the SPAAA in BF2, so I may be wrong

+1 vote     reply to comment
[TZP]LoNer1
[TZP]LoNer1 Dec 6 2012, 3:02pm replied:

That wasn't a SPAAA, that was the 9k22 "Tunguska" ;)

+2 votes     reply to comment
BossGeneral
BossGeneral Dec 6 2012, 5:00pm replied:

BF2 has the Type 95 SPAAA which is the PGZ-95 for the Peoples Liberation Army.

Battlefield.wikia.com

Images.wikia.com

Clearly different from the 9K22 Tunguska-M1. The 9K22 Tunguska does show up actually for the MEC but the Peoples Liberation Army uses the PGZ-95/Type 95 instead of the 9K22.

+1 vote     reply to comment
[TZP]LoNer1
[TZP]LoNer1 Dec 7 2012, 2:46am replied:

See my comment below :P

+1 vote     reply to comment
[TZP]LoNer1
[TZP]LoNer1 Dec 6 2012, 3:31pm replied:

Ignore that, I forgot the Chinese... silly me.

+3 votes     reply to comment
dhd
dhd Dec 6 2012, 4:19pm replied:

You are correct, the upper part of the turret is a good 20-30% too slim. Don't worry too hard, it'll all be O.K. in-game.

+2 votes     reply to comment
t95blackeagle
t95blackeagle Dec 6 2012, 3:11pm says:

GREAT work on model and texture but i think turret is small

+2 votes     reply to comment
dhd
dhd Dec 6 2012, 3:38pm replied: +11 votes     reply to comment
Keksz
Keksz Dec 6 2012, 3:41pm replied:

ah yes!

+3 votes     reply to comment
CanadaMan7
CanadaMan7 Dec 6 2012, 4:00pm replied:

my body is ready

+14 votes     reply to comment
flames09
flames09 Dec 6 2012, 4:30pm replied:

Hahahahaha

+3 votes     reply to comment
BossGeneral
BossGeneral Dec 6 2012, 5:03pm replied:

That should be known as the PGZ-2012. Incorporating elements from the PGZ-04A and the PGZ-07.

+1 vote     reply to comment
BossGeneral
BossGeneral Dec 6 2012, 4:59pm replied:

If you want to see a bigger turret you can look at what is known as the PGZ-2000/PGZ-07.

Wartime.org.ua

This is actually the successor to the PGZ-04A/PGZ-95 shown here.

+1 vote     reply to comment
roman9441
roman9441 Dec 7 2012, 4:06am says:

No fly zone

+3 votes     reply to comment
GLALeaderDaDon
GLALeaderDaDon Dec 7 2012, 7:01am says:

my vote was right! Can't wait for beta

+1 vote     reply to comment
Reborn:X
Reborn:X Dec 7 2012, 7:49am says:

The SPAAG is missing the radar.

+1 vote     reply to comment
dhd
dhd Dec 7 2012, 8:03am replied:

What's that dish on the turret?

+2 votes     reply to comment
Reborn:X
Reborn:X Dec 7 2012, 11:20am replied:

Goddamit I mistook the Type-95 construction from the Russian Tunguska SPAAG with the dome-like radar part.

+2 votes     reply to comment
BossGeneral
BossGeneral Dec 7 2012, 12:29pm replied:

The PGZ-95 and the 9K22 Tunguska are not even similar in appearance so I am not sure how you can mistake one for the other.

Tunguska:

Army-technology.com

PGZ-95:

Image02.wiki.livedoor.jp

+1 vote     reply to comment
Timgao929
Timgao929 Dec 11 2012, 6:37pm replied:

Its more a psychological matter than a physical one, the people in the West usually consider that only they and Soviet/Russians can "create", while China is only capable of "copy". In fact, from the tried-and-true type 63 MLRS, to the kick-*** J-20, China did dish out many creative goodies to slap their face, but unfortunately many of them still see things the old fashioned way.

0 votes     reply to comment
Scorch17
Scorch17 Dec 17 2012, 5:38am replied:

Type 63 MLRS is based on Soviet BM-12.
J-20 is clearly based on design of "project 1.46" (deep modification of MFI 1.44) which were probably sold to China.

+2 votes     reply to comment
rkraptor70
rkraptor70 Dec 18 2012, 7:39pm replied:

Reality check: There was no project 1.46. it's just a hoax created to downplay the J-20.

0 votes     reply to comment
Timgao929
Timgao929 Dec 25 2012, 1:47am replied:

Well, the type 63 is a completely different system. You don't see a BM-12 can be break down to 24 pieces so they can be carried by 24 men on foot, and this thing is in 107mm calibre, NOT the BM-12, which is way larger, and they cannot be carried in the same fashion as the type 63. Don't let the Wikipedia misguide you!

0 votes     reply to comment
Scorch17
Scorch17 Dec 26 2012, 10:13am replied:

BM-12, not BM-21 lol. BM-12 and Type 63 have the same caliber and actualy it's the same weapon actually. As for project 1.46 - it was the index for Mig 1.44 modification and it's exist only on papers, wich was sold to China.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Timgao929
Timgao929 Dec 29 2012, 2:36pm replied:

Well, BM-21 is a hell on wheels, and I do know the difference between a mobile MLRS system and a towed MLRS. To be honest, I doubt if the BM-12 actually exist. Outside Wikipedia, I could NOT find any serious hard evidence to prove that it did match your claims, only handful of different armature bloggers' descriptions, and even those did not even match each other. I also searched library in my college, and guess what? I could only find Type-63 and BM-21, NOT BM-12. Like i said, Type-63 can be easily carried by men on foot, because it was designed for guerrilla warfare, while Soviets designed their artillery systems mostly for 'brute force" operations. For Project 1.44/1.46, I believe that rkraptor70 already had your answer.

0 votes     reply to comment
Scorch17
Scorch17 Dec 30 2012, 5:08pm replied:

Lol indeed - looks like BM-12 is someone's fantasy. There is only the 140 mm RPU-14 which is based on BM-14. Also I found information that Chinese leaders ordered a reverse-engineering of the Soviet BM-14 some of which were bought even before Sino-Soviet border conflict, so i still think that the Type 63 is not pure chinese weapon. About project 1.44/1.46 - there are alot information about it including photos and videos, so i don't know what is rkraptor70's problem . And yeah, I forgot to mention that the J-20 has many elements from F-22 and F-35 too, like nose structure and frontal section, air intakes. There is no doubt that the J-20 is the another reverse-engineered weapon.

+1 vote     reply to comment
foxslider
foxslider Dec 10 2012, 11:08am says:

will the wheels cycle when it moves? to be honest still wheels look very strange in the game haha

+1 vote     reply to comment
dhd
dhd Dec 10 2012, 3:35pm replied:

Yes they turn. So far the Overlord, Paladin, and Gattling tank have spinning tank wheels.

+1 vote     reply to comment
miguelvale
miguelvale Dec 18 2012, 2:20pm says:

simply...amazing!

+2 votes     reply to comment
assidiq178
assidiq178 Dec 24 2012, 12:21pm says:

THIS IS SPAAA !!!

+1 vote     reply to comment
UNSC_SCOUT
UNSC_SCOUT Dec 26 2012, 12:40pm says:

not final?
Wow, this one is amazing already, cant wait to see the final.

+1 vote     reply to comment
dhd
dhd Dec 26 2012, 4:27pm replied:

Some proportions are fixed and texture improved. Go check it out now in the downloads section! :D

+1 vote     reply to comment
Laqueesha
Laqueesha Feb 18 2013, 12:43am says:

"Kick it into high gear!"

+1 vote     reply to comment
Post a Comment
click to sign in

You are not logged in, your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) which we encourage all contributors to do.

2000 characters limit; HTML formatting and smileys are not supported - text only

Description

Replacement for China gatling tank. Model and texture not in final state, so I wouldn't worry yourselves with trying to find mistakes ;)

Image Details
Type
Entertainment
Date
Dec 6th, 2012
By
Keksz
Size
1920×1080
Options
URL
Embed (big)
Embed
Share
Report Abuse
Report media
Add Media
Members only