The Lord of the Nords joined Oct 18, 2011

Avid supporter of a fully recovered and effective Russian Federation, professional public media shredder, aircraft enthusiast, harsh critic of today's "scientific" community or its lack thereof, and also a gaming enthusiast of sorts.

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
RSS feed My Blogs


[Crowd]: Oh please noooo...

What am I reviewing today? That would be the SWBF3B, otherwise known as the Star Wars Battlefront (no. 3 technically, but EA actually just wanted the title for its glory, nostalgia factor, and above all, FAN SERV... Er, money, not because they were genuinely making a third instalment) Beta (that's said BEE-TA).

Let me open with an illustriously generic opening banner:


The first thing that will slap you round the ears with a wet jandal are the graphics, they are beautiful, and without a doubt this is the best we've ever seen the Frostbite engine, this isn't really saying much because I never was particularly impressed by the Frostbite engine, specifically Frostbite 3.Uh Oh. Anyway, kudos to DICE, they managed to regain control of their engine after their miserable failure of a game that was Battlefield 4 (to say nothing of Visceral's Battle$ Hardlol that was about as innovative as a rock in the middle of a desert full of rocks).

The sound; it's literally having John Williams directing the London Symphony Orchestra inside your room with Ben Burtt and crew playing all those classic Star Wars sound effects, altogether, at the same time. It's incredible, but if DICE had somehow managed to screw this up it could have kissed its dally into the Star Wars Universe goodbye, so it's to be expected.

THE GUNS: They go pew pew, kill things, and feel generally all round fantastic. If you get those reload cooldowns on time you can be all gangsta and shit... I don't know. Interesting design choice not having ammunition, but I think it works well enough, as it was a grey area anyway.

THE THERMAL IMPLODER: This guy gets a seat right here because that noise is straight out of heaven (or hell, whatever you find more macho). 10/10


GAMEPLAY: This is where it counts folks (as we all know, because we are well versed in this sort of thing) the be-all-end-all of a game.

Walker Assault: It's unique, and it's not Conquest, that's a +1 in my book. The dynamic back and forth gameplay makes for a fluid fast moving battle, with opportunities for epic flanking manoeuvres, periodic spawn rape, and zero opportunity for casual recon bushmonsters to camp and snipe for the entire match (although there was no dedicated sniper rifle in the Beta, players still tried and failed with the Cyclic Rifle card). The problem is that the mode is massively unbalanced BOTH ways. How does that work I hear you ask? Well when playing the Empire it becomes Walker ASSault, you will stomp the Rebels the majority of the time, but there are the few times that the Rebels win and it sows the seed of doubt in your mind, is all this Imperial Splendour simply a ruse? Yes, and no. This is where there are some very strange balancing issues going on. When one side begins to win, you stomp the other side 6 meters under. I couldn't tell you exactly why, as I think it is a combination of things, but I'll give it my best shot. The Rebels only have to take out the walker on the right hand side (Bob) (when playing Rebels) to insta-win, how? Orbital Strike. Then essentially kick back and relax and wait for dat Snowspeeder mini-game at the end of the match to take out poor Fred on the left. So it really takes the very smallest amount of T-E-A-M-W-O-R-K to actually win as Scum. The same goes for when playing the Mighty Skrub Killing Empire, just even less so.

Drop Zone: It's TDM/King of the Hill, it's fun with jetpacks, and good for casual play (meaning if you have any practice in an FPS at all you will dominate the skrubs who play with a 60 degree FOV in first person perspective and don't know how to sprint). Otherwise, it's same sameness done alright, neither good nor bad, but in the long run it'll quite possibly turn painfully average.

That Co-op Mo... no wait this belongs under the bad...

Those starfighters... Well they conform with all the normal pros already detailed. They look great, sound great, and when you hit that internal view button you sit there going "WHY THE HELL ARE THERE NO SPACE BATTLES?!" They also scream (literally in the case of the TIE) through the air at Mach One, which makes a lovely change from Battlefield's hand-holding. The flight controls are abysmal, really abysmal. It's like you're permanently stuck in safety mode, in reality I imagine it's like not being allowed to exceed your G-limiter or maximum angle of attack. In saying that I managed to vaguely get the hang of the TIE Fighter, which is by far the most superior anti-infantry starfighter in the Beta, simply because the cannon spacing actually allows you to hit small targets. Yep, these super advanced starfighters don't even have targeting assistance that regulates round dispersion at different ranges, meaning that the classic X-Wing can't hit stuff all when strafing ground targets simply because its cannon spacing is to far apart. Seems legit. The Snowspeeder is awful, I don't even know what you're supposed to do with it other than rope those AT-ATs in that really fun mini-game at the end of the match (sarcasms). The spawns also allow enemies to destroy you right off the bat before you even get control of your damn spacecraft. Small issue...

Dat AT-ST doe: This guy deserves his own category. "Chicken Walker!" Remember that? I do, Chicken wasn't so powerful back in those days, but he's come back with a vengeance. This guy can walk right up to the Rebel spawn at 50kmph, and just wreck. I mean really wreck, like why would you even bother playing Darth Vader wreck, like this is the ultimate power fantasy of every Star Wars fanboy ever since forever, wreck, like where are those stupid teddy bears from Endor when I need them, wreck. I'm talking 30-0 within 5 minutes of the match starting, no joke. But again, the balance issues, it really only take about four guys to concentrate on the AT-ST to take it down, especially with the Ion Ammo and Ion Grenade cards, along with every noob and his Cyclic Rifle which does an obscene amount of damage, also Scum only have to use their damn turrets which are scattered everywhere, seriously, use your damn turrets Scum. I'm no balancer, but I can say they nailed the "realism" so to speak of an AT-ST, but the moment they nerf it I feel like that magic will be lost, and the moment they buff anything else to counter it, it'll become utterly mediocre. Their job, not mine.

The Heroes: They're okay. Remember, nothing can stop Darth Vader's lightsaber.


That Co-op mode: Highlights how this game is not wanting to be Battlefront, but is forced to be. It's alright, but all it does is overwhelmingly highlight the fact that there is no campaign.

WHY DID YOU CALL IT BATTLEFRONT EA?! Was it really necessary? This is an okay game, not great, but not terrible which is really an improvement for you! But just imagine the amount of flak this whole thing could of avoided if it'd gone with a different IP. Call it Battlefield: Star Wars, okay maybe too close, Star Wars: Invasion, Star Wars: Casual, Star Wars: I Have An Identity, I don't know what your PR or advertisement team does but they seriously suck. I could tell you right now that you would have made around about the exact same number of sales calling the game something else. WE'RE NOT STUPID. If it's good we will buy it, if it's bad we won't, if it's average it can go either way, but if it's average AND people see you as riding on the name of a classic franchise simply for profit? It will do nothing but hurt your bottom line. Because of greed, you killed this game's identity before it was even born, your Battlefront knows what it wants to be, which is a serious strength in a game today, but it isn't a Battlefront.

Start a group Groups
2011 Mod of the Year Awards

2011 Mod of the Year Awards

142 members Event

Welcome one and all the to 10th annual Mod of the Year awards, celebrating all that is great about our beloved modding community, the developers, the...

2012 Mod of the Year Awards

2012 Mod of the Year Awards

135 members Event

Welcome one and all the to 11th annual Mod of the Year awards, celebrating all that is great about our beloved modding community, the developers, the...

2013 Mod of the Year Awards

2013 Mod of the Year Awards

102 members Event

Welcome to the 12th Annual Mod of the Year Awards, a celebration of the years finest mods chosen by you and us.

2014 Mod of the Year Awards

2014 Mod of the Year Awards

75 members Event

Welcome to the 13th Annual Mod of the Year Awards. An epic celebration of modding for developers and players, with the years finest chosen by you and us.

Age of Fans

Age of Fans

578 members Fans & Clans

For all fans of Age of Empires & Age of Mythology!

Aircraft Lovers Group

Aircraft Lovers Group

1,360 members Hobbies & Interests

This group is open to everyone who likes any kind of aircraft

Artillery Lovers Group

Artillery Lovers Group

422 members Hobbies & Interests

Originally applied to any group of infantry primarily armed with projectile weapons, artillery has over time become limited in meaning to refer only to...

Assassin's Guild

Assassin's Guild

547 members Hobbies & Interests

This Group is dedicated to the Assassin's Creed franchise. Everything you need to know about Assassin's Creed is here, including content and news for...

Post comment Comments  (90 - 100 of 265)
OminousSpudd Creator
OminousSpudd Jul 23 2015 says:

Haven't got $120 to blow on Battlefront Get Everything In One Package Premium Limited Ultimate With Benefits Edition Skrub. Guess that means I'm missing out on Han Solo's blaster, an ion torpedo, and a special grenade. gg dice

... Jokes, you think I'd buy your over-priced vapourware at all? Get real.

+1 vote   reply to comment
TypicalRussianIvan Jul 26 2015 replied:

Maybe I'll sound like a raging oldfag, but srsly m8
New Battlefront sux compared to Battlefront 2
No drivable AT-AT, not so many maps, not so many jedis and NO SPACE BATTLES

+2 votes     reply to comment
OminousSpudd Creator
OminousSpudd Jul 28 2015 replied:

Yet a ton of assets are there for space battles... ISDs, Nebulon-Bs, Mon Calmari, and CV90s. What does this mean? Space battles will arrive... in a later DLC package.

AT-AT on rails, 20v20 player count, broken Frostbite engine (terrible tickrate), can't maintain a stable 60fps on the PS4 (what does that mean for the PC?), 3 heroes? Given Han Solo's blaster is an equippable weapon for pre-order skrubs... no Han?

Also, let's not forget DICE's map design team, who apparently know crap all about map design in an FPS... ahem, BF4.

I plugged hours and hours into Battlefront and Battlefront 2, but sadly I will NOT be buying this latest iteration. If you're a raging oldfag, I'm one as well. Maybe we're both "Too old for this ****."

+2 votes   reply to comment
TypicalRussianIvan Jul 31 2015 replied:

Well, I wouldn't be so sure about Space Battles just because of added ships.
And CV90 is not that much of a big ship. It can be easily parked on the battlefield like Millenium Falcon in the battle of Hoth or Republican Ship on the Tatooine.
It can also be a battlefield like a Boeing plane in cs_747.
Remember Battle of Geonosis in the first Battlefront? It wasn't space battle, but the still were Acclamators floating over the battlefield and you could even see Venator somewhere higher.

Also, If i got it right, no playable Droidekas.

+2 votes     reply to comment
Cookiestealer Jul 16 2015 says:

Just want to thank for that you seeking some truth, mate.

+3 votes     reply to comment
OminousSpudd Creator
OminousSpudd Jun 4 2015 says:

Oh Bellingcat, you piece of Western paid trash.

+3 votes   reply to comment
Orange_Tomato Jun 4 2015 replied:

Lel, just came here out of intereset to see whether you would jump on to the conspiratard/RT Bellingcat hate-bandwagon.


P.S.: they used error level analysis just as tangential point of discussion once - Russian trolls start losing their ****

+1 vote     reply to comment
OminousSpudd Creator
OminousSpudd Jun 4 2015 replied:

Doesn't matter, NATO head of staff have quoted it as a reputable source. Bellingcat can't afford to be caught lying.

Photos of Eliot Higgins with the Atlantic Council in Kiev and you call me a conspiratard? Look at his twitter feed. Impartial citizen journalist my ***.

By the way, is that all you've got? Ad hominem? There is smoking gun proof staring you in the face that you're being lied to on an epic and widespread scale and all you can do is attack the messenger. Either get stuffed, or change your outlook on this situation.

+3 votes   reply to comment
Orange_Tomato Jun 4 2015 replied:

>all you can do is attack the messenger.

Wow, great audacity man. Debate 101: post an article attacking the messenger, then accuse the opponent of attacking the messenger. Great, 5/5. Your sudden obsession with journalistic integrity is so incredibely laughable when all the media sources you read are paid for by an oppressive, authoritarian, warmongering and corrupt goverment that crushes "freethinkers" like you at home.

>Doesn't matter, NATO head of staff have quoted it as a reputable source. Bellingcat can't afford to be caught lying.

After all the Russian fakes he has exposed, we wouldn't be listening to the Russian goverment at all with that logic. Despite that suddenly a certain sector of the internet loses their **** and completely denounces him and all his work, despite all the other points, even in the same one article still standing.

> There is smoking gun proof staring you in the face that you're being lied to on an epic and widespread scale

You must be talking about RT and other "impartial and independent" Russian state media, that have presented 5 different versions of the MH17 tragedy, deliberately obfuscating the truth, despite knowing they did it, and using disgusting media tactics to spread their lies.

P.S. Higgins was affiliated with the Atlantic Council for a few articles, that's all. And all the other points in that clean, journalistically not smearing article ("british nerd", "unconnected loner") article are moot and worthless.

+2 votes     reply to comment
OminousSpudd Creator
OminousSpudd Jun 5 2015 replied:

Cool story bro. I think I phased out at about the second paragraph, or was it the first? Yeah, definitely the first.

1st option it is then. Top notch old chap, absolutely spiffin.

+3 votes   reply to comment
Orange_Tomato Jun 5 2015 replied:

Ok, stay ignorant bro. Having nothing to say except repeating ****** propaganda must be hard.


+1 vote     reply to comment
OminousSpudd Creator
OminousSpudd Jun 5 2015 replied:

...hashtags? :/

+3 votes   reply to comment
OminousSpudd Creator
OminousSpudd May 13 2015 says:

I saw this in an RT video's comment section. Usually it's just full of trolls, but this was a gem to be shared.

"The United States government today announced that it is changing its emblem from an eagle to a condom because it more accurately reflects the government's political stance.
A condom stands up to inflation, halts production, destroys the next generation, protects a bunch of dicks, and gives you a sense of security while you're actually being screwed."

+6 votes   reply to comment
Post a comment

You are not logged in, your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community. Or sign in with your social account:

Last Online
22mins 41secs ago
New Zealand New Zealand
Become friends
Member watch
Start tracking
2011 Mod of the Year Awards2012 Mod of the Year Awards2013 Mod of the Year Awards2014 Mod of the Year AwardsDesuraDeveloper BanterIndie DBIndieRoyaleMod DB
139 of 541,121
32,483 (2 today)
Time Online
6 days
Activity Points
17 members
Site visits
Send Message
rkraptor70 Online 14 minutes ago
French_Fry Online 1 hour ago
INtense! Online 1 hour ago
AllenZakiv_Blackwell Online 1 hour ago
Turkish007 Online 1 hour ago
TypicalRussianIvan Online 1 hour ago
[TZP]LoNer1 Online 1 hour ago
nasorog Online 1 hour ago
ℱℓσℊℊℯɾ Online 2 hours ago
NationalGuard Online 3 hours ago