"In landing operations, retreat is impossible, to surrender is as ignoble as it is foolish. above all else remember that we as attackers have the initiative, we know exactly what we are going to do, while the enemy is ignorant of our intentions and can only parry our blows. We must retain this tremendous advantage by always attacking rapidly, ruthlessly, viciously, and without rest." - General George S. Patton, Jr.

Report article RSS Feed World of Tanks History Section: AMX 50 100 / AMX 50 120

Posted by ʇɐuʞɐʇǝp on Jul 18th, 2013

Tankarchives.blogspot.ca

The Second World War and its many years of occupation led to stagnation
of the French tank building school. The ARL-44, planned for production
in 1944, was already obsolete compared to tanks of the USSR, USA, or
Germany. French engineers had to quickly develop a tank that could deal
with modern war no worse than a Tiger or IS.


Compared to their colleagues from other countries, the French had less
experience in building tanks. However, instead of picking apart a
captured tank and copying it, they decided to experiment. The result was
very interesting.


While they did not copy anything outright, the French borrowed some
technology from their "inherited" German E-series documentation. The
first prototype, named AMX M4, was reminiscent of the King Tiger. It had
the same suspension, with interleaved road wheels and internal shock
absorbers. However, it had a rear engine and transmission. The tank was
never built in metal.


A decision was made that the new tank had to have a more protected
turret and a more powerful 100 mm gun. The French put the gun in an
oscillating turret. The turret was composed of two parts. The gun was
fixed in the upper part, and has no mantlet. Vertical aiming was
achieved by moving the entire top part of the turret up and down.
Horizontal aiming was done by rotating the lower part of the turret.
This allowed the turret to be very small, due to a lack of gun elevation
mechanisms. Additionally, one crew member could be eliminated by
installing an automatic loader.


The first autoloader used a revolver drum-like cassette. The cassette fit 6 rounds, which had to be refilled manually.


The new tank was indexed AMX 50 100. Aside from the new gun, it received
a better suspension, 120 mm of front armour, and a 1000 hp gasoline
engine. In theory, the tank was supposed to accelerate to 60 kph, but
tests never managed to get it over 51 kph. Even that result was pretty
good for a heavy tank.


In 1951, during continued tests of the AMX 50 100, a new 120 mm gun was
developed. The model with this gun was called AMX 50 120. The tank was
developed as a counter to Soviet IS-3 and T-10 tanks.


Like its predecessor, it had an oscillating turret and an autoloader.
The hull was changed. The front was "piked", like the IS-3. Aside from a
120 mm gun, the turret had 7.5 mm machine guns, to combat enemy
infantry. The hull was cast, which increased its durability. The
increase in mass decreased maneuverability. The French wanted the tank
to accelerate to 65 kph. This would have required a 1200 hp motor, but
the French never managed one that could achieve more than 850 hp.


The increase in caliber had a downside. While 100 mm shells were still
serviceable, manually reloading a cassette of 120 mm shells was hellish
labour.


The French were proud of their new tank. They considered it as mobile as
a Panther, as powerful as an IS-3, as reliable as a Sherman. Even
Germany was interested in this new tank, and made a preliminary contract
to buy some AMX 50 tanks.


However, if you look past the developers' optimistic views, the AMX 50's
real life applications were questionable. Its mobility and autoloader
would give it an edge in quick battles, but its weak armour and large
size made it completely unsuited for prolonged combat.


AMX 50 never made it to mass production. Only five of these very
interesting vehicles were built. Many opinions exist as to why. Some
historians claim that the tank was insufficiently protected, especially
against HEAT. Due to the oscillating turret, it was difficult to protect
the crew against chemical weapons, or radiation. Finally, oscillating
turrets were not compatible with NATO's standardization plans.


There is another version. The tank was "buried" by corrupt officials.
After the Korean war, America had a surplus of tanks, which had to be
sold to someone quickly. Some French military officials made a
profitable deal, and France got M47 Pattons instead of AMX 50s.


Original article available here.

Post a Comment
click to sign in

You are not logged in, your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) which we encourage all contributors to do.

2000 characters limit; HTML formatting and smileys are not supported - text only

Level
Avatar
Avatar
Offline Since
Dec 17, 2014
Country
Antarctica Antarctica
Gender
Female
Member Watch
Track this member
Blog
Browse
Blogs
Report Abuse
Report article