This member has provided no bio about themself...

Comment History  (90 - 120 of 4,035)
Pouk
Pouk Jul 11 2015 replied:

This comment has been posted in a private group.

Pouk
Pouk Jul 11 2015 replied:

This comment has been posted in a private group.

Pouk
Pouk Jul 10 2015 replied:

Legendary is a good goal to aim for. :)

+2 votes   mod: REARM V2
Pouk
Pouk Jul 10 2015 says:

This comment has been posted in a private group.

Pouk
Pouk Jul 9 2015 replied:

This comment has been posted in a private group.

Pouk
Pouk Jul 9 2015 says:

This comment has been posted in a private group.

Pouk
Pouk Jul 8 2015 replied:

You know ETA is tricky and it's still not close, it doesn't take shape yet, so I can't give you one. It will be months though, probably more than half a year, I want it to be in a good state when it comes out.
The main point of not giving ETA is that it's annoying for everyone else if I get it wrong.

V2 will have a focus and a solid plan and the mod is being built with placeholder models istead of just improvising certain ideas that felt good at the time. So updates will be more common and meaningful.

+2 votes   mod: REARM V2
Pouk
Pouk Jul 8 2015 replied:

You would think it's not a hard word, only 5 letters.

0 votes   media: Vaygr Pulse Laser Destroyer/Missile Cruiser
Pouk
Pouk Jul 7 2015 says:

This comment has been posted in a private group.

Pouk
Pouk Jul 7 2015 replied:

@SkyblastB1:
You're describing something entirely different. Maybe some other mod, maybe some other game, but not this one. Cruisers with repair stations (?) and flaks (that's definitely not going to happen), Destroyers that are faster than Frigates and a very Supercapital ship heavy gameplay.

You could make your own mod. Rebalancing classes and weapons to your liking is not hard, it's just getting the new ships that is.

+1 vote   mod: REARM V2
Pouk
Pouk Jul 3 2015 replied:

This comment has been posted in a private group.

Pouk
Pouk Jul 3 2015 says:

This comment has been posted in a private group.

Pouk
Pouk Jul 3 2015 replied:

This comment has been posted in a private group.

Pouk
Pouk Jun 26 2015 replied:

Yeah I know that saying "it's more probable to have Dreadnaughts than Battleships" was completely meaningless, since I have my own mental image of what defines a Honeworld Dreadnaught and you don't see into my head. But to me these aren't the same.
In short my version of Dreadnaught is a pure combat heavy hitter, it doesn't even have hangar, it's very narrowly focused on the task of melting big pieces of metal that are painted in enemy colors. Like a really mean big Battlecruiser crossed with the Progenitor Dreadnaught.
While Battleship could be more self-sufficient, universal, perhaps even modular or with limited building capabilities or special abilities. I can imagine only allowing one in the unitcaps. Like something you would imagine a Flagship to be, if you didn't already know that Homeworld Flagships are just oversized slow Shipyard-carriers.

Now I don't claim at all this is historically accurate, in-line with the Earth naval classifications. This is what these terms represent to me in the context of the Homeworld game.

Dreadnaughts are pretty straightforward to balance. I still haven't figured out a safe way to introduce Battleships though. With this and all the rest of what I just said in mind, this is why I said "Dreadnaughts are more likely to be added than Battleships."
On the topic of why I didn't provide any further explanation, nobody knows...

+1 vote   mod: REARM V2
Pouk
Pouk Jun 26 2015 replied:

Dreadnaughts are more likely to be added than Battleships.

+1 vote   mod: REARM V2
Pouk
Pouk Jun 26 2015 replied:

This comment has been posted in a private group.

Pouk
Pouk Jun 26 2015 replied:

This comment has been posted in a private group.

Pouk
Pouk Jun 25 2015 replied:

This comment has been posted in a private group.

Pouk
Pouk Jun 25 2015 replied:

This comment has been posted in a private group.

Pouk
Pouk Jun 25 2015 replied:

I've made a Battleship concept a couple months ago: Youtube.com
I simply tried to produce something that doesn't just look like a scaled-up Battlecruiser. This one was meant to be a "double decker" design. It still sort of does look like a BC.

That all said Battleships and Dreadnaughts are tricky. Even Battlecruisers are a bit OP, Battleships would be even more problematic. What would be their damage, their armor, their cost and their speed?
What's the ballance between them popping one BC after another, jumping to an enemy Mothership and melting it in a single salvo and between the cost so high it's not worth building and speed so slow it's irritating to even move the thing. Where's that sweetspot between them being good enough, but not gamecrashingly OP. And what drawback are too much. And would such ship simply bring more benefits than ruin the game?

One idea that was flying around in my devgroup was that Battleships couldn't hyperspace, or couldn't hyperspace on it's own. So while they would be really strong, you could see the ship and its support fleet closing in on you on sublight. (-In that case it would have to have more or less the speed of a Battlecruiser.)
Another thing are arrays of damageable weapons.
Or that simply owning the Battleship would cost you a certain amount of RU per minute.

The bottom line: it is possible. But I won't have it, unless/untill I figure out how not to make it gamebreakingly OP.

+1 vote   mod: REARM V2
Pouk
Pouk Jun 24 2015 says:

This comment has been posted in a private group.

Pouk
Pouk Jun 24 2015 says:

This comment has been posted in a private group.

Pouk
Pouk Jun 24 2015 replied:

This comment has been posted in a private group.

Pouk
Pouk Jun 22 2015 says:

This comment has been posted in a private group.

Pouk
Pouk Jun 22 2015 replied:

Anyway back then, if you found my part of criticism of the Battlecarrier insensitive, then sorry.

I have a very thick skin about this myself and I'm used to argue about this stuff. A lot. Especially in my dev group, where I told people not to hold back. BTW there's a guy who doesn't like the turrets either.

+1 vote   media: Vaygr Cruiser model 02
Pouk
Pouk Jun 22 2015 replied:

But if my Cruiser is going to turn to be "problematic" or offensive for the general public, I'll face the angry mob.
I'm willing to risk it. :)

+1 vote   media: Vaygr Cruiser model 02
Pouk
Pouk Jun 22 2015 replied:

If I wanted to be subtly arrogant, I'd ask whether this Cruiser is less Vaygr than Vortex is Hiigaran.
But I don't understand how I'm being arrogant. By presuming I do have a grasp on understanding the aesthetics? If so then yes, I do claim that.

I could get what you're trying to say, but that starting possition of yours confuses me. What I don't get is that you had 5 turrets on a Vaygr Capital (primary non-combat) ship, possibly of bigger mass than this Cruiser, and yet you're trying to suggest that 2 on mine are way too much?
You had four kinetic turrets on a ship that was presented as "yet unspecified race", but I'm the one breaking the racial themes?

Is the whole point warning me "not to make the same mistake"?
Also if you do personally prefer more "realism" and breaking of stereotypes, what's is your problem with two perfectly Vaygr turrets on a perfectly Vaygr ship then?

This will be more confusing than anything, since it's just a concept and I personally don't count them as canon (while other modders often do), but what about this then:
Homeworld.wikia.com
That's one damn big official Vaygr Battlecruiser...

OK, this doesn't "look" Vaygr (even though it is). :) But my point is that simply because there isn't a BC with turrets, it doesn't mean there can't be. It's not a problem problem if it feels right.
-There isn't any Battleship, but people make them for their mods. And the funny thing is their problem is completelly the opposite, they're just scaled-up Battlecruisers, they're not different enough! :D
-Hell, people made the Vortex, by these standards you can say anything goes...

+1 vote   media: Vaygr Cruiser model 02
Pouk
Pouk Jun 21 2015 replied:

This comment has been posted in a private group.

Pouk
Pouk Jun 21 2015 replied:

This comment has been posted in a private group.

Pouk
Pouk Jun 21 2015 replied:

Well I think I was one of them, if you're reffering to the Battlecarrier's nose Ion turret. You were defending it as a Taiidan herritage.

It's not that the Vaygr cannot have Kinetic weapons. For them to look right they just have to hug the ship's body really closely. Sort of melt into the ship's general shape.

The Destroyer,
Assault Frigate,
Gun Platform,
even the Vaygr Infiltrator Frigate.
The Vaygr Kinetic turrets are hiding somewhat, while on the Hiigaran ships they are in a plain view in the open right in the middle on an extruded platform. Just take a look at it from that perspective.

You could say that Vaygr rarely have more than 2 turrets. But this Cruiser does only have two and they are incased in and around the middle structure.
While your Battlecarrier had 4 Kinetic turrets sitting on the highest points of the hull and one Ion Turret at the front. It's not something you can compare.

But sure, if a crashing criticism comes my way, I consider myself warned. :) But I think I know my races well enough and can defend my possition.
...and honestly I'll do it my way anyway.
As someone from your team said, "you can't please everyone".

+1 vote   media: Vaygr Cruiser model 02
Level
Avatar
Avatar
Offline Since
Sep 4, 2015
Country
Czech Republic Czech Republic
Gender
Male
Member Watch
Track this member
Comment Statistics
Posts per day
1.8
Members
14
Games
3
Mods
895
Articles
54
Media
1,698
Downloads
91
Groups
1,421