This member has provided no bio about themself...

Comment History  (150 - 180 of 2,217)
Panzert
Panzert Mar 18 2012, 2:44am replied:

The hell are you on about? Comrade is the correct spelling.

+2 votes   member: ComeradeStalin
Panzert
Panzert Mar 17 2012, 11:33pm says:

I thought I recognised this. :P

+1 vote   media: Antonov 225 WTF...
Panzert
Panzert Mar 17 2012, 9:13pm says:

Awesome.

+1 vote   media: Caucasus 1942/1943
Panzert
Panzert Mar 17 2012, 1:32am replied:

Panthers, I'd say. That and German industry was trying to spit out ATLEAST 8 different 'main' production vehicles by 1944. I don't think it could be stretched much more.

+3 votes   media: Panzerkampfwagen 4 projekt W 1466
Panzert
Panzert Mar 16 2012, 6:02pm says:

Loving the new version.

My only problem was that it crashed once when some troops surrendered.

It's only happened once though and I'll look into what the error actually was if it happens again.

+1 vote   media: Get back to the fight!
Panzert
Panzert Mar 15 2012, 8:25am replied:

Yeah, ok. But retaliating on a mod page the coolgman just happens to be affiliated with is not the way to go. It's not fair to joebama who hasn't actually done anything.

+8 votes   mod: Overturn
Panzert
Panzert Mar 15 2012, 4:44am replied:

Indeed. While I may not agree with what coolgman has to say, that is certainly not the way to handle criticism.

Infact I've now lost alot of respect for rumpel.

+7 votes   mod: Overturn
Panzert
Panzert Mar 13 2012, 9:17pm says:

I think he just uploaded a bunch of thumbnails...

+1 vote   media: possible repost
Panzert
Panzert Mar 13 2012, 6:20am says:

Fantastic work for a pen drawing!

+1 vote   media: My quick drawing
Panzert
Panzert Mar 13 2012, 2:00am says:

I can see this causing friendly fire incidents on both sides if there's ever and American-Iranian war.

+1 vote   media: Zulfiqar-3
Panzert
Panzert Mar 11 2012, 8:15am says:

I don't think it's Russian.

+3 votes   media: T72m, i think(?)
Panzert
Panzert Mar 9 2012, 3:29pm says:

T-55 copy?

+1 vote   media: T95 Medium Tank
Panzert
Panzert Mar 9 2012, 3:15am replied:

ah right

+2 votes   mod: Half-Life: Revisioned
Panzert
Panzert Mar 8 2012, 10:53pm says:

Ok I've seen some fairly unrelated stuff to tanks here, but this takes the cake.

+2 votes   media: Got Milk?
Panzert
Panzert Mar 6 2012, 11:40pm says:

Rip & Tear!

+5 votes   mod: Brutal Doom
Panzert
Panzert Mar 3 2012, 6:56am replied:

haha, I agree.

Usually because it shows them dramatically in combat. Whereas most real pictures are just shots of them stationary somewhere.

+3 votes   media: M1 Abrams
Panzert
Panzert Mar 3 2012, 6:55am says:

That is the coolest looking leopard 2 I've ever seen.

+4 votes   media: Leopard 2
Panzert
Panzert Mar 3 2012, 6:54am says:

Old enemies, New friends.

+9 votes   media: M1 and T72
Panzert
Panzert Mar 2 2012, 4:36am replied:

Yeah as integral said, most Germans tanks had them.

+1 vote   media: Beasts of war.
Panzert
Panzert Mar 1 2012, 9:26pm replied:

They fix bugs and address gameplay issues in every single update. Just because they don't publicly announce bug/gameplay fixes before patches are released doesn't mean they don't happen.

+1 vote   media: Tankhunter Ambush System 2.0
Panzert
Panzert Mar 1 2012, 5:28pm says:

Aw, this was all i had to save me from my friend's destructive sherman hordes. :P

I really do like the idea of needing bushes for the camouflage ability though.

+2 votes   media: Tankhunter Ambush System 2.0
Panzert
Panzert Feb 29 2012, 8:12am replied:

Funnyjunk? :P

Link's borked.

edit: was this it? Static.stomp.com.sg

+1 vote   media: Beasts of war.
Panzert
Panzert Feb 29 2012, 7:58am replied:

It was both. Only this was the 'PzKpfw NbFz VI', not the 'PzKpfw VI'.

+2 votes   media: Beasts of war.
Panzert
Panzert Feb 29 2012, 3:04am replied:

T-35 :P

+8 votes   media: Beasts of war.
Panzert
Panzert Feb 29 2012, 3:03am replied: +2 votes   media: Beasts of war.
Panzert
Panzert Feb 27 2012, 11:20pm says:

OSTHEEEEER

+8 votes   media: Sdkfz. 251 ausf. C
Panzert
Panzert Feb 25 2012, 12:07am replied:

Lost my ****.

+2 votes   group: Warhammer 40K Fan Group
Panzert
Panzert Feb 22 2012, 11:32pm replied:

It's rather unfortunate that battlefield 2 suits the gameplay best. FH would be amazing on a more competent engine.

+2 votes   media: Forgotten Hope 2 / Battlefield 2 mod
Panzert
Panzert Feb 22 2012, 1:22am replied:

I think he means lack of a cupola.

+1 vote   media: New model: StuG III
Panzert
Panzert Feb 20 2012, 3:25am says:

I was wondering if this would reappear a few days ago actually.

+2 votes   article: Topsites are back!
Panzert
Panzert Dec 23 2014, 9:04pm says:

This looks great, I have high hopes for the future!

+1 vote   game: Zulu Response
Panzert
Panzert Feb 10 2014, 11:58am says:

it'd be cool if you could balance them by giving them limited fuel and ammunition, but afaik you can't do that without extensive coding if at all in the CoH engine?

+1 vote   media: M60a3
Panzert
Panzert Aug 5 2012, 8:36am replied:

Italy and North Africa.

+2 votes   mod: Operation Avalanche: Fall of Italy
Panzert
Panzert Feb 2 2012, 8:06am says:

More info here btw.

Army-guide.com

0 votes   media: Modernized T-55
Panzert
Panzert Jan 30 2012, 6:55pm replied:

Though not entirely impossible (referring to your German tanks comment) as various nations sold Syria some old panzer IVs in the 60s and they saw service during the water war and the 6 day war of '67.

+2 votes   media: GLA Scorpion Tank
Panzert
Panzert Dec 10 2011, 9:26pm says:

Oh god, not this again.

+2 votes   media: Goodsmile Racing Tank
Panzert
Panzert Nov 24 2011, 11:33pm replied:

Pretty sure they are there... somewhere. Some tanks are hard to make out because of the angles they're at.

+2 votes   media: Got Tank?
Panzert
Panzert Oct 24 2011, 4:31pm replied:

Think what you will then, i won't try and change your mind.

-2 votes   media: Tiger compared to Allied tanks
Panzert
Panzert Oct 24 2011, 4:56am replied:

He references David M. Glantz who is usually of Soviet bias and if he's saying it aswell, then it's usually true.

+1 vote   media: Tiger compared to Allied tanks
Panzert
Panzert Oct 22 2011, 7:47pm replied:

I think you should read that link do0med posted.

0 votes   media: Tiger compared to Allied tanks
Panzert
Panzert Oct 4 2011, 5:51am says:

I'm not sure why people don't realise this but both this and the p.1000 ratte were cancelled in 1943.

+4 votes   media: landkreuzer p. 1500 monster
Panzert
Panzert Jul 24 2011, 9:12am replied:

i'm totally fine with that.

But someone getting angry at me and then claiming something they don't have evidence for is ridiculous..

+1 vote   media: BMP-1
Panzert
Panzert Jul 15 2011, 2:41pm replied:

No, i mean look at the dates. :P

Almost a week late with this, hope you still see it.

+1 vote   media: messerschmitt M323 Gigant
Panzert
Panzert Jul 8 2011, 12:52am replied:

Me 321 Gigant
Role Cargo glider
Manufacturer Messerschmitt
First flight 25 February 1941
Introduced 1941

Wut

+1 vote   media: messerschmitt M323 Gigant
Panzert
Panzert Jun 21 2011, 5:45am replied:

Actually, It would have been a wise choice to halt panzer IV & Tiger production in favour of the panther since it's argueabley the most balanced tank of WWII (Hell, some people even call it the first MBT). They managed to get 5000 produced from 1943-1945 so it would probably be worth it in the long run.

+4 votes   media: The Tiger III
Panzert
Panzert Jun 19 2011, 1:24pm replied:

He means that there was more than 1 citadel.

+1 vote   mod: Yuris Story
Panzert
Panzert Jun 19 2011, 1:22pm replied:

Actually doesn't raising the bar say they were 'flashed' to earth in many major cities?

+1 vote   mod: Yuris Story
Panzert
Panzert May 31 2011, 9:14am replied:

Don't worry, if it's anything like reality the Germans will have developed Anti-tank weapons and tactics much further than the British. So if they do encounter one of the few German tanks i'd say the infantry would struggle to defeat it abit more than the Germans would with a British tank.

+2 votes   media: British War Machine
Panzert
Panzert May 29 2011, 3:07am replied:

Size essentially just makes you a bigger target. It doesn't help to have a bigger gun when you're being overwhelmed by several smaller things.

0 votes   media: Australian MCV
Panzert
Panzert May 28 2011, 12:15am says:

Hey, it's that guy from youtube.

Cool.

+2 votes   member: DiplexHeated
Panzert
Panzert May 19 2011, 8:37pm replied:

No, the IS-2 was not bigger than the king tiger. You can look that up for yourself. The soviets had some post-war heavy tank EXPERIMENTS but they went any further than that, the soviet union proceeded to go with small and light designs as evident by the use of an autoloader in future designs and the cramped interiors of soviet tanks.

The soviets have never had a preference for heavy tanks, get over it.

+1 vote   media: Australian MCV
Panzert
Panzert May 14 2011, 2:27am replied:

"It looked at me funny..."

+1 vote   media: A-10 Thunderbolt AKA Warthog
Panzert
Panzert May 7 2011, 9:08am says:

Technically this image is not allowed. I refer to the main description. "simply everything with straps, armor and gun :D"

+3 votes   media: Tanks!
Panzert
Panzert Apr 28 2011, 7:57pm replied:

I've been over this damnit, the Germans had the Panzer III and IV during the Polish campaign, not just the czech tanks and light panzers.

+1 vote   media: Poland in multiplayer
Panzert
Panzert Apr 4 2011, 10:37am replied:

haha, close enough

+1 vote   media: Mark VIII
Panzert
Panzert Mar 31 2011, 9:13am says:

you certainly know what you're talking about. As chadaface said i have to appreciate the fact that you don't just start a flame war.

+1 vote   member: p*a*t*t*o*n
Panzert
Panzert Mar 31 2011, 1:24am says:

This needs more attention! It's one of the only WW1 FPS games in existence.

How long has work been going on this?

+2 votes   game: THE TRENCH
Panzert
Panzert Mar 20 2011, 8:36pm says:

I hope you have a historical advisor.

+1 vote   game: The Rise of the Third Reich
Panzert
Panzert Mar 18 2011, 8:23pm replied:

I always read that as dead mau five

+2 votes   article: Man or Maus?
Panzert
Panzert Mar 18 2011, 10:37am replied:

lol :P

+1 vote   media: T-80
Panzert
Panzert Mar 14 2011, 11:05pm says:

That said, kind of sick of seeing the IS-4 and IS-7. Almost seems as though they're the only tanks in the damn game.

+2 votes   media: IS-4 Wallpaper
Panzert
Panzert Feb 23 2011, 7:33pm says:

Holy ****...



What's up with the turret of that t-55?

+1 vote   media: Some kind of Tank 8D
Panzert
Panzert Feb 20 2011, 5:18pm says:

Damn trolls

+2 votes   media: Typo 90 + Touhou
Panzert
Panzert Feb 7 2011, 5:37pm says:

I still don't really like the use of MoW models as it limits creativity and alot of them don't look right in the company of heroes engine.

-4 votes   media: KV-85
Panzert
Panzert Feb 7 2011, 6:29am replied:

They called it cuckoo iirc

+1 vote   media: Fallschirmj√§ger Support
Panzert
Panzert Jan 30 2011, 12:19am replied:

No it couldn't. And it is actually a rather difficult tank to mass produce, hence why only 400 of them were actually built.

+1 vote   media: Panzer 16 "Krieg Wagon"
Panzert
Panzert Jan 18 2011, 11:23pm replied:

But WWII had still happened, the progress of tanks tanks was still the same up until the late 50s.

That said one country wouldn't keep the same tank in service for over 100 years.

+1 vote   media: Panzer 16 "Krieg Wagon"
Panzert
Panzert Jan 18 2011, 10:20am says:

Annnnd how is a king tiger related to the fallout series?

+1 vote   media: Panzer 16 "Krieg Wagon"
Panzert
Panzert Jan 8 2011, 7:28am replied:

Yeah, the range and penetration system is pretty odd. One of the other reasons i stopped playing it was because 70% of all the games i played in it just ended up as heavy tank battles.

+1 vote   media: World of Tanks: MS-1 ownage
Panzert
Panzert Jan 4 2011, 6:56am replied:

Men of war is a very good game for tank battles, i used to play it alot up until april last year. And i agree WoT is pretty unbalanced and annoying (Artillery, anyone?), i just picked it up again a week or 2 ago to try it out again.

I stopped playing MoW though because of some cheaters i encountered a few times and made me ragequit.

+1 vote   media: World of Tanks: MS-1 ownage
Panzert
Panzert Dec 28 2010, 9:54am says:

Recently got my panzer IV. I finally feel like a man. ;_;

+1 vote   media: World of Tanks: MS-1 ownage
Panzert
Panzert Dec 27 2010, 11:56am says:

t-95?

+1 vote   media: Vehicle Unknown
Panzert
Panzert Dec 12 2010, 7:25pm replied:

I said MBTs are essentially heavy tanks because they've taken on their roles such as mass breakthroughs and longrange tank combat, as well as technical advantages. As for the armour, i was never trying to prove that thickness didn't matter, just that it doesn't do much against sabot rounds and that these days you can't just solely rely on it.

+1 vote   media: Tiger Tiki
Panzert
Panzert Dec 11 2010, 10:42pm replied:

I see what you mean. But MBTs essentially ARE heavy tanks now that i think of it, they've just taken on board better elements from successful tank designs and fused them together. It's a very strange arguement to pick at as not as much is known about how armour works these days and it's seemingly become more confusing. I see where you're coming from with armour thickness, but it only matters with some projectiles. If you've had a sabot round fired at you it doesn't really matter how thick your armour is, you're screwed anyway. If you have an rpg fired at you in a very complicated way, armour thickness does matter but that's a rather confusing subject to get into as these days you also need to take into account what the armour's made of, what RPG round was fired at it, does it have ERA?, etc etc.

+1 vote   media: Tiger Tiki
Panzert
Panzert Dec 10 2010, 6:25pm replied:

That's true, but armour no longer works in the same way, guns no longer fire the same projectile they did 70 years ago. Heavy tanks these days would be more useless in my eyes no only would they face similar problems as they did back then, but the thick armour wouldn't matter. Any modern tank gun would cut it open like a knife going through flesh.

+1 vote   media: Tiger Tiki
Panzert
Panzert Dec 10 2010, 7:54am replied:

haha

+1 vote   media: Tiger Tiki
Panzert
Panzert Dec 10 2010, 12:44am replied:

Fuel... was a problem because the german heavy tanks consumed so damn much. That combined with the fact that they were continuously losing territory. Tank production was hindered by the bombings, not as much as people often exaggerate but it did hurt it. For example, it was almost the sole reason the Germans only manage to build 492 king tigers instead of say... 700. I'll admit no matter what they never would've reached the full production order of 1300 even if there were no bombings, but they would no doubt have produced more than they did.

With the matter of the IS-2, with tank development going as rapidly as it was in ww2 the Russians had obviously figured out a way of somewhat limiting the capability of the 88 as well as giving their heavy tanks abit more punch (However i still think the 100mm would have been a better choice than the 122). All in all though i think the heavy tanks were just a huge waste of resources on both sides and tank production should've been left to the panthers and t-34 as they were where the future of tanks lay. Heavy tanks are good for nothing more than engaging eachother and destroying heavy bunkers, They have no true offensive capabillity.

TL;DR: heavy tank production is pointless.

I'm not even sure why i wrote all that, but there's my views. lol.

+2 votes   media: Tiger Tiki
Panzert
Panzert Dec 9 2010, 10:13pm replied:

The T-34 had significantly greater losses than Tigers. The real worry for the tiger was the IS-2. It's just by 1943 the soviets could EASILY recover from any losses they had. With Allied bombing runs combined with the complex manufacturing proceedure of their tanks, the germans could not keep up. Not to mention when you have one really, slow powerful thing versuses several speedy, medium capable tanks, the powerful thing isn't going going to keep up and with eventually get flanked.

The panther was a better match for the t-34 than the tiger.

+1 vote   media: Tiger Tiki
Panzert
Panzert Dec 6 2010, 7:18pm says:

20mm autocannon?

+1 vote   media: Exciting new screen shots!
Panzert
Panzert Dec 6 2010, 12:33am says:

Belongs in all 3 of the main groups really :D

The ratte was just a myth, the nazis were really working on a giant pool to have a party with everyone in. They started a war with them to keep it a suprise. Unfortunately the war got out of hand and it was destroyed in the process.

+7 votes   media: Uhhm... Armoured Aircraft Carrier Panzer-ship?
Panzert
Panzert Oct 6 2010, 10:28am replied:

lol, thanks. Sorry if i seemed hostile with my original comment.

+1 vote   media: Action...
Panzert
Panzert Oct 6 2010, 7:30am replied:

Not exactly obvious they're snorkels.

Anyway, all i was doing was giving a more obvious description. Can we drop it at that please?

+1 vote   media: Action...
Panzert
Panzert Sep 8 2010, 3:31am says:

Idea very similar to that of vault 101. Though i understand it was possible to open the door in that. This, i take it, is not.

+1 vote   mod: Wasteland Consequences
Panzert
Panzert Jul 30 2010, 9:03am replied:

nah, it's alright.

+1 vote   article: Some Change in the Roman Empire
Panzert
Panzert Jul 27 2010, 9:41pm says:

Why is this in the tank lovers group? >.>

+1 vote   article: Some Change in the Roman Empire
Panzert
Panzert Jul 20 2010, 2:02am says:

Ah, here we go

+1 vote   article: British Expeditionary Force
Panzert
Panzert Jun 21 2010, 2:02am says:

Looks like they based the design on the jagdpanzer 4 or whatever it was

+1 vote   media: Kanonenjagdpanzer
Panzert
Panzert Jan 3 2010, 3:56am says:

It is indeed the tiger(P). The chassis was reused for the Ferdinand/Elefant tank destroyers

+3 votes   media: TIGER II
Panzert
Panzert Dec 31 2009, 9:58pm replied:

Oh no he's not. Check out his other work before you even think about hiring him.

+2 votes   mod: United Abominations
Panzert
Panzert Oct 16 2009, 10:53pm says:

jagdtiger Q.Q

Better use it wisely

+1 vote   mod: Cross of Iron
Panzert
Panzert Jul 12 2009, 10:47am says:

<3 mafia

+2 votes   media: My desktop from 14/7/2008
Panzert
Panzert Jun 20 2009, 6:12am replied:

:| *Leaves the room*

+3 votes   mod: To delete
Panzert
Panzert Jun 15 2009, 7:44pm replied:

I doubt it would be untouched.

The whole area would be full of radiation and would be damaged in reality.

+4 votes   mod: To delete
Panzert
Panzert Jul 21 2007, 11:18pm says:

w00t

+1 vote   mod: Human Error
Panzert
Panzert May 25 2007, 4:18am says:

:D this is gonna rule

+1 vote   game: Verdun
Panzert
Panzert May 22 2007, 5:42am says:

OMGWTFBBQ!!!!!!!!111!!! i liek tis!!!!!111111

+1 vote   mod: DEAD
Panzert
Panzert Apr 14 2007, 7:34am says:

This mod is a dream come true

+1 vote   mod: RADIOACTIVE SOURCE
Panzert
Panzert Mar 26 2007, 10:32pm says:

i played the alpha and i love it :D

+1 vote   mod: Meteor City of Lost Heaven
Panzert
Panzert Nov 3 2006, 6:51am says:

:D

+1 vote   mod: Big Scientists
Panzert
Panzert Mar 23 2006, 2:48am says:

great models ;)

+1 vote   mod: Xen Assault
Panzert
Panzert Feb 22 2006, 2:40am says:

w00t

+1 vote   mod: Combine Destiny 2
Panzert
Panzert Jan 24 2006, 7:18pm says:

yeah i agree

+1 vote   member: Panzert
Level
Avatar
Avatar
Offline Since
Jan 31, 2015
Country
Australia Australia
Gender
Male
Member Watch
Track this member
Comment Statistics
Posts per day
0.6
Members
144
Games
33
Mods
773
Articles
113
Polls
12
Media
1,252
Downloads
14
Groups
97