What? You again!!!
"the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Yes, who are these "people" whose protected right to bear arms will not be infringed upon? Are the "people" those people that the federal government decides are allowed to bear arms? Or are they all citizens whose rights are clearly defined in the constitution? Do you think anyone disputed civilian ownership of guns when the constitution was ratified?
"An even more absurd argument has been the "we need guns to protect us from our GOVERNMENT who is going to round us up and put us into FEMA CAMPS!" "
What sort of idiotic strawman is that? Anyone that believes that guns are an effective check on government tyranny is a nutcase worthy of contempt? Sounds like you need to study political science (not to mention history) a little more. Expecting people to have blind faith in the benevolence and incorruptibility of the government is incredibly naive and stupid. You want to curtail people's ability to resist government tyranny.
Sorry. If someone wants to beat the **** out of you, the answer IS to shoot them. You can be seriously maimed or crippled by some violent thug that attacks you. I live in an awful ghetto in St. Louis and I have no faith in the police to protect me from psychopaths. Look up "knockout king" on google if you want to know the type of people around here.
Besides that, an "assault weapon" ban is just the first phase of gun control. The marxists want to ban all civilian ownership of guns. Anyway, you're right that I won't persuade you and you won't change my views, so it's best to leave it at that.
Lawful citizens wish to maintain their right to defend themselves and their families against people that want to hurt them. That is logical and commendable. Your perspective says that lawful citizens cannot be trusted and that the government should have a monopoly on lethal force. You detest freedom.
You think, "If some gang of thugs beat the **** out of me and burn down my home, the police will save me!"
Yes, we saw how brave your police were during the London riots. And what did the ordinary civilian have to defend themselves and their property against marauding "youths"? Baseball bats! That'll scare 'em. ;-)
You just repeat the platitudes you hear on the BBC (the mouthpiece of the elites who hate you). You don't have a thought of your own.
A star port in St. Louis? Hm, judging by the condition and demographics of the city right now, I don't think we'll be ready to build a star port in three hundred years. Ditto for London and Paris!
You are a true idiot. You would deny people the right to defend their lives against criminals. Do you realize that the police do NOT have a duty to protect you? Of course, you live in the UK, aka 1984-land, a place where if you express the "wrong" ideas on facebook you're thrown in jail. We Americans understand that if we allow the government to suspend our second amendment rights, soon other rights will also be taken away.
The three-days preparation period sounds neat. That should really add replay value. This may be THE war game I've always wanted. :D
What's wrong with the NRA? Or do you support a fascist federal government violating the constitution by disarming lawful citizens? You sound like a NAZEE
WB = HITLER! (that means they're very bad).
This is a pretty radical redirection. Looks good, though. :D
I'll have more confidence in this mod once you upload an in game image of a character rigged with your star wars armor. :D
Looks good. The boards look a little too big, though. Guess the uv-map needs some work. Could use a normal map, too. Not a bad start.
You're right. Maybe you know what you're doing. We'll see. ;-)
lol. Skyrim and star wars don't mix! I'd also like to know how the mod leader intends to rig his google sketchup models, seeing as he (presumably) doesn't have enough modeling experience to make his own armor. these are questions only time can answer. :D
this looks like a fail mod. hopefully I'll be proven wrong. :-)
Looks neat. :D
What do the grey rings mean?
Looking forward to a video. :D
I'd like to see what the gameplay's like.
They could add a 'Galactic Conquest' mode and skip the story. That'd be a stepping stone for a full single player campaign if they decide to go that route. The Galactic Conquest would be an easier way to get a single-player mode implemented, maybe. :-)
I'm looking forward to the cemetery. :D
Fancy! I love Warcraft II. Where's the Ogre Juggernaut. :D
Hahaha. That little fellow brought a sword to a cannon fight! I'm impressed by how well he dodges those cannon balls. ;-)
Don't worry. ;-)
I'm sure they're just going to use some sort of campaign map again. I doubt they'll do anything radically different. It'll be more of the same. :-/
The perfect spot for my castle!
But wouldn't it be fun to march your fully equipped company across a 3D world up close? The campaign map is antiquated. We want something new. :D
Go play Warband if you're so overly fond of obsolete features!
all the games using the custom built engine look like crap! this engine gets 1 out of 10!
I'm guessing the sails respond to the wind direction now. :D
Sounds good. ;-)
Can't wait to see this in action.
Looks great. :D
I will definitely be an unofficial backer until I raise some funds. :D
That is Lord Albertus you're addressing! Show some respect, you filthy peasant!
I have two questions.
1.) Do you build units?
2.) Do you capture cities?
This looks great. :D
I like how the cannon ball pushes the whole ship forward. That makes me laugh. :D