This member has provided no bio about themself...
I'm seeing links to this video appearing on the SoaSE forums, the UI especially is being praised, rightly in my opinion.
Are those formations automatic, or did you manually put the ships there for the shot?
Now that you've said that, at least one ship in the mod has to do that.
I went a little ways back and couldn't find any convienent images of infantry standing near tiberium, to compare to the harvester.
So could you post an image that includes some infantry standing next to a harvester? It can be part of the background of an image featuring something else.
(Grrr... it didn't post as a reply...)
I was mainly saying it would look cool if the tank visually exploded upon the destruction of the building.
Not exactly a galactic threat, are these old scinfaxi? I'd say any of the modern DoV factions could eat them for breakfast.
I never played TS, so I say it should be a beam, but have it look like the TW shockwave effect. Oh, hey! Taxikiller had the same idea!
You know what might have been cool... if the TW emmiter had fired a weak wave effect instead of a concentrated line, that way it would slaughter infantry in a large area.
I think the old ones look better, but as SighNapse mentioned more details are to be added, I might change my mind.
If it's possible,
That storage tank with the GDI symbol on it has to explode upon the buildings death, preferably spectacularly!
Now we just need some rocket pods on the side...
Har! Har! jk
It's the U.N. Peacekeeper's symbol, it's meant to resemble the cross used by the Crusaders.
Wait! They all have white stars!
Eat panthers Nazi scum!
Why do they all have white stars?
I was replying to K05T4R but forgot to hit the reply button.
I think you could have snow drift down occasionally, but I'm pretty sure you can't have explosions cause it.
Unless you have scripted explosions, then you just have to time the falling snow to the explosion.
A: The AX-13 isn't buildable
and B: the ion cannons you are thinking of are the size of large buildings. If they could fit them on a plane, why would they put them in orbit?
I have a suggestion for the Odessa: have one of its attack quotes be something along the lines of "Fire torpedoes." It makes some sense given the torpedo 'pontoons.'
Unfortunately he sabotaged his sabotage by making them cool, so now the soviets will crush everyone with their endless cool ships.
Thanks a bunch mobius.
When you think about it, "Night Watch" makes almost no sense in space.
I almost didn't make this my background, but then I realized the blue would be a nice change from the many red tinted DoV background I've had.
Out of this picture, I see only the description needs work.
You should probably remove "from becoming easy targets", that way the sentence makes sense.
Argh! When I read "turn a small moon into swiss cheese", a particular Star Wars quote popped into my head.
Anyways, the ships look awesome.
The wording is a little immature, but I still like it!
I still play 1942, and the Battlegroup 42 mod rocks.
I was at a spot I could download this, YESTERDAY.
I'll go somewhere with better Internet and download it in a few days.
Seasonal coniferous forests?
Wait, were you talking to me, Falleen?
Then is it an orbital structure?
Aren't they firing missiles?
It being so flat makes it look a little odd.
Thanks for the responses, I was mainly just bringing up the point, and I did think only the planets in a system were linked like that.
The only other problem I can think of with the phase lanes like that is the visual clutter.
I don't think having all the gravity wells linked to each other is such a good thing, for it removes almost all the choke points. It's hard to defend core planets when capturing an outer asteroid allows access to all the planets.
However, bigger gravity wells and more ships is always a plus.