I am the Archduke of Hell, and I welcome you to my profile.
We're not 100% sure on what we need to cut out yet. Until the base of the mod is finished we won't know for certain.
A British-like faction is a mainstay, though after restarting they are subject to a name change, which is the case already, though there will be more info on that at a later date.
This is a singleplayer only mod.
No. It is not dead. We've got a lot of things to do at the moment, and spreading rumours about our mod being dead is not going to help us one bit.
So did I, but apparently it's what was worn during this period.
Who knew a minor misspelling could be so controversial to some people.
It isn't a problem with the scene OBJs, they work perfectly, it's a problem with the code. So changing the scene OBJs around doesn't do anything.
The bug is simple: The game crashes upon entering a town scene. It only seems to plague the new towns that we've added unfortunately, and we don't have the faintest clue what's causing it, it's most likely an issue in the source code, and to be honest rebuilding would be a lot faster than trying to find it.
I wouldn't, I like my integrity intact.
Will never understand why people tell content creators to open a Patreon account.
Personally I'd rather just take everything we have now and make an original setting from the ground up. But that won't be happening any time soon.
As much as I'd like to have Taleworlds contract us to make an official DLC, I'd much rather just release this for free.
Moddb.com already got confeds up.
It's a mix of most Latin American countries, but leans more towards Mexico.
"A lot of people have also been asking about alpha and beta releases, to those people: No, we're not releasing an alpha, or a beta; We're going for a full release. We won't be giving any release dates (Made that mistake before), nor will we speculate."
- Our most recent dev blog.
Easy enough, but it just looks off, especially when NPCs have facial hair.
As much as I'd like to include the option for the player's hair to be visible, there'd be far too many clipping issues.
Estates play a completely different role than what you envisioned. They serve as a multipurpose player home rather than a source of income.
Anything your heart desires. Hell, you could create a faction of pickelhaube bedecked samurai that use repeater rifles, axes and grenades.
You start with a simple troop tree with infantry, skirmishers and cavalry, but how you equip them is entirely up to you. You can have an all infantry army, all cavalry army, cav and skirmishers, infantry and cav, anything you want, really, some basic equipment will be provided but I won't limit what players can do with their custom troops.
We're not doing alphas or betas, we're going straight for a full release, 'cause back in my day, people expected games and mods to be complete!
--And much glory will ensue!
Ah man, seeing this brings me back. Damn I miss Jedi Academy.
Ultimately I'm apathetic to drug use, I don't see it as particularly bad, nor good either, and if someone wants to abuse drugs, it's their choice. On an individual level, I don't find it particularly appealing, I much prefer a strong whiskey over a joint.
I wouldn't put too much stock in what you see on Tumblr, it seems to attract the worst types of people.
None what so ever, if anything he's turned me and several others into hardline anarcho-capitalists!
There is simply no debate, Stellaris is greater than dope.
It would appear this whole back n' forth has gotten us nowhere. I've spent the last two days trying to explain to you that you could simply post your own videos if you don't like the content people are posting, so things don't seem so "onesided" to you.
I am aware humanism is not a political ideology, it was merely an example of how atheists can differ ideologically, however are you aware that atheism does not require humanism? They can exist mutually from eachother, atheism is merely a stance on the existence of a god/gods, if you find it hard to separate atheism from anything else you believe, then may I suggest you find a gaggle of religious atheists? Clearly you're more inclined to dogmatic thought than you think, perhaps you'll find yourself right at home amongst Atheism+.
If you want to continue this meaningless ****-slinging contest, feel free to shoot me a message with your response, I'll get back to you another day.
I think your entire post can be summed up in this single sentence:
"My case is, that the onesidedness displayed here does not live up to the standards an essential humanist group should set itself"
This isn't exclusively a humanist group, it's a group for atheists, anti-theists and sceptics of all stripes, whether they're humanist, communist, liberal, libertarian or conservative, and we have no "standards", it's a free-for-all, and we'd like to keep it this way.