Welcome on my profile. I am RTS fan, especially Generals ZH. I am looking for other players, so if you like Contra, TEOD, or any other mod and want to try with me, just PM me.
That must be photoshop. Please...
It all depends on kind of island and how I got there. It is a good idea to look for useful things that survived crash as I did before waves take them away. Any food, water, tools, medicals. If I can make fire, it something I would do as soon as possible, because it repels dangerous animals. Looking for water and food feels easier with torch in hand. Also big fire can attract possible rescuers.
If I met a lion on island, I would be pretty much surprised. But if I really meet it, I don't think I would shoot . With that gun there is nearly no chance, so I would probably end up feeding the lion...
I have no idea how long I could last. Probably not more than just a few days - it is water I fear the most. You can get some energy from plants if you accidentally don't pick some poisonous ones, but tropical diseases in water and insects are real danger. I would definitely save one bullet for me, it can become the best option when it comes to illness.
This expression reminds me of my friend using LaGG3 with 23mm cannon whenever he can (in Il2 1946). When it hits, it is always the right wing. Always.
I... hmm, ok...
Don't know what they want, but they want it NOW!
I envy you...
Actually this only looks dangerous. But it is stable.
Perhaps the party was red...
1. I would take people. Even if those guys are untrained, at least enemies won't focus only on me. Twenty enemies are too many, one man can sneak into house, but only hardly can take out all before they suspect something.
2. If we are trained and there is a way to go unnoticed, I would take Scorpion EVO 3 with silencer - small, light, reliable and deadly efficient. If they know about us, I choose VEPR12, or Saiga12. And flashbangs may help - no need to worry about hitting the hostage.
3. Rescue Party. Simple enough...
Can you get help? From India for example? I must admit I have no idea about politics in that part of world.
He has no bunker to protect them and if you use them for attack, they are slow and have to go around radiation fields they created. You pay for that extra firepower and can't rush with them.
Funny that if you use scope, you see everything closer - including areas around the scope. Is there a way to fix this?
My brother used to do this when he was small.
Three digits is what you usually need, more is a luxury.
Since they always land on Manhattan...poor guys...
Wow, reason! He is soooo romantic.
Happy New Year!
If you want anyone to take your comment seriously, you should give specific example. If your AI just stands there, you did something wrong with installation (probably renaming the Script folder). Or you are using unofficial maps.
Any possible upgrade to match it with S400?
I guess that playing fair is a complaint about number of enemies (Red Army's strong aspect), or bombing of factories, so they couldn't produce their precious technological miracles.
Regarding this, I heard lots of "If there were more Tiger IIs and Maus tanks...". Yeah, if there were, RAF and Il2 units would have slightly more work. There is no reason to fight such things with tanks.
But it would be a waste of good armor.
Still, if I had to make a choice, I guess that life of Tiger's crew was slightly longer than crews of Shermans or T34s in average.
I am not nazi lover, but they really were technically advanced. But that advance was too expensive.
Every German tank was a Tiger!
No, it's a horn.
And why not? If it works... Well, looks like we have another BAN on planes :)
Powered by coal
@B7Biscuit - That's why I mentioned theory of relativity. You couldn't see any effect until we came with world network and satellites. When Einstein came with it, it turned every mechanics we knew wrong. Yes, Newton's mechanics are still valid enough for our needs in small scale, but mathematical model and basis were ruined with this new theory. Yet this model is better and closer to truth than previous and that's why we are using it.
It is not same with question of our origin. While experiments and simulations behaved according to scientific theories of Big Bang and Evolution, there are still people refusing these. Or worse, mixing them together with God to get things like scientology and creationism.
Instead of accepting new, better fitting model, proved by many experiments, some people can't bear absence of God in this - trying to smuggle him in, or debunk these for all cost. Dwelling on easy answers that are as old as humankind itself won't push us forward.
To Tom Drake!