Welcome on my profile. I am RTS fan, especially Generals ZH. I am looking for other players, so if you like Contra, TEOD, or any other mod and want to try with me, just PM me.
He has no bunker to protect them and if you use them for attack, they are slow and have to go around radiation fields they created. You pay for that extra firepower and can't rush with them.
Funny that if you use scope, you see everything closer - including areas around the scope. Is there a way to fix this?
My brother used to do this when he was small.
Three digits is what you usually need, more is a luxury.
Since they always land on Manhattan...poor guys...
Wow, reason! He is soooo romantic.
Happy New Year!
If you want anyone to take your comment seriously, you should give specific example. If your AI just stands there, you did something wrong with installation (probably renaming the Script folder). Or you are using unofficial maps.
Any possible upgrade to match it with S400?
I guess that playing fair is a complaint about number of enemies (Red Army's strong aspect), or bombing of factories, so they couldn't produce their precious technological miracles.
Regarding this, I heard lots of "If there were more Tiger IIs and Maus tanks...". Yeah, if there were, RAF and Il2 units would have slightly more work. There is no reason to fight such things with tanks.
But it would be a waste of good armor.
Still, if I had to make a choice, I guess that life of Tiger's crew was slightly longer than crews of Shermans or T34s in average.
I am not nazi lover, but they really were technically advanced. But that advance was too expensive.
Every German tank was a Tiger!
No, it's a horn.
And why not? If it works... Well, looks like we have another BAN on planes :)
Powered by coal
@B7Biscuit - That's why I mentioned theory of relativity. You couldn't see any effect until we came with world network and satellites. When Einstein came with it, it turned every mechanics we knew wrong. Yes, Newton's mechanics are still valid enough for our needs in small scale, but mathematical model and basis were ruined with this new theory. Yet this model is better and closer to truth than previous and that's why we are using it.
It is not same with question of our origin. While experiments and simulations behaved according to scientific theories of Big Bang and Evolution, there are still people refusing these. Or worse, mixing them together with God to get things like scientology and creationism.
Instead of accepting new, better fitting model, proved by many experiments, some people can't bear absence of God in this - trying to smuggle him in, or debunk these for all cost. Dwelling on easy answers that are as old as humankind itself won't push us forward.
To Tom Drake!
But why is it different to accept scientific explanation of our origin and other things and technologies? Do you doubt theory of relativity? I suppose you don't and if you do, well, your smartphone works because it counts with it. Why is it different with evolution and big bang?
Looks nice. What else are you planning to make?
If he created everything, natural laws must also be his creations. Gravity is attribute of matter, so he must have added that attribute, right?
But my previous point is that saying 'that's God's will' slowed development a lot. Just because people wanted to believe they are superspecial. Middle of all universe, kings of Earth. As we advance, our previous understanding proved or disproved and new knowledge can be almost unbelievable at first - Galileo, Darwin, Einstein,...
I don't think anyone doubts Earth position in space. At least I haven't seen anyone thinking that Earth is flat and middle of everything. Yet still I am seeing comments about Earth being 6000 years old and creation of humans. Why is it different to accept scientific explanation of solar system and our origin?
There were more people than just Galileo (Darwin for example). And while the church preserved literacy, they only preserved books that were pro-church and burned the other.
The problem is, the God is answer to any question. Without him, more people would study and try to explain phenomenons around. And those who did anyway wouldn't be afraid to show the results if those could be considered as heresy.
Well, for what I know, Hitler and those close around were interested in old Germanic mythology and also Asian mythology. For creating new pure race, of course.
This is so ridiculous as to debate which pope was actually devout. Dictators and manipulators used, use and will use religion for their needs as long as there are religious people (and then they will find something else). Whatever he said for Christianity or against is irrelevant (especially because he said both things). Everything he did was to strengthen his position, even propaganda of German supremacy. This also applies to all those nice uncles on next image.
Communism never existed. That's just a small correction, I don't deny the crimes that were done in it's name. There is even some analogy, isn't it? 'Big Stalin, father of nation, will crush his enemies (probably with mustache). What he does, he does for us and we have to work for him...' Only that heaven (the actual state of communism) was offered before death. Sounds appealing, having heaven in this life, right?
And to actual abortions - I think that being unwanted child is much worse than not being at all. No matter if born from rape, or from other reasons the parents wouldn't like the child, such child can hardly have a happy life. Abortion in this case can be understood as mercy for both the child and parents. Also I am not sure if this can be called murdering a human - since it's done long before gaining self-consciousness.
If I predicted that, I would be much more than just a prophet :)
Call me a prophet...
That guy reminds me of someone.
Perhaps because USA never came...
There is the valid point of argument that you asked: of course if you attack one group, members get offended. Striking back feels good and righteous, doesn't it?
Now why did you asked this (here?)? Isn't this obvious?
What did you expect? Of course it wasn't 'Ow, sorry, we are using even triple standards and we are very ashamed of it.' No, you wanted a flame war, so here we go. And yes I feel like on high ground now. You can disagree from your point of view, but that's all you can do about it. You can only bring me more (and you will) in your next post. And it will go from revenge to revenge until someone delete it - then it will be quiet for a while, until you (and I mean you personally) toss this here again.