This member has provided no bio about themself...
Hope you'll get enough rest during the holidays. Thanks for all your effort so far and don't sweat it, it's nice enough you're doing it for free. Happy new year! (would be nice though to share more of screenies or dev diaries and such)
Looks great. Are you planning to finish correcting the Danube/correct the Dniester?
Hillary is doing it right, though. At least when it comes to Black Lives Matter.
Black Lives Matter is ********. Statistically, morally, mentally, socially and so on. I still don't know why after so much time people still take them seriously( even Bernie, even after losing face because of the "cucking"). As for the second part, the fact that you paid doesn't mean you don't have to behave(something I'm sure Bernie has yet to learn).
By the way, most blacks see straight through their crap. Case and point, Hillary winning the black vote.
Hence we need Hillary. Not because she is good for our particular demographic(liberals) but because she isn't horrible. Seing as you are also an atheist, naturally you've heard of Sam Harris. Here he voices his vote and the reasons.
Since this isn't Africa, I doubt voter fraud could encompass over 10% of all votes. Besides the first case is about idiots ****** about the rules because they didn't know the rules. Rules that also applied to Hillary voters.
The second link is about nitpicking. They didn't vote yet so the media shouldn't mention who they're planning to vote for? Why? Because she can't fathom why her perfect candidate lost ("**** white people/aren't whites so racist?" and "the West is so misogynistic" and "they dindu nuffin") so now she has to make an excuse which is mostly about the corporations conspiring to destroy her saviour of America.
The number of super delegates is consistent throughout time and actually smaller than in 2008(when nobody batted an eyelid when the majority of super delegates supported Obama instead of Clinton).
Nobody stole anything. Cut the super delegates and the CNN bullcrap, but at the end of the day Hillary still has 3.5 million votes more than Sanders. Bernie expressed his ideas(among which unfortunately we may find some far left classics like "**** white people/aren't whites so racist?" and "the West is so misogynistic" and "they dindu nuffin" and don't get me going on economics), he put them forward, then people looked at his ideas, they judged them and then he lost.
Every Bernie or bust person is pretty much throwing a hissy fit. Waaah waaah, I didn't get my way because people didn't vote like me! waaah waaah. I realy can't imagine what they think they're going to achieve by not voting. Do they think anyone is going to care? Would they rather have Donald Trump? Seriously? Are they so Partisan they're willing to stop caring about the future of their country just because they didn't get their perfect candidate? As far as Hillary goes watching any Sam Harris video on the topic should be enough to provide some much needed context to those people.
As far as Rosario Dawson goes, everything loosely associated with the Young Turks triggers my fight or flight instinct.
In all fairness, vikings founded Russia. All the russians probably want is to teach their cousins how to be manly again.
Are you even asking this? Of course! 10 more days to play as totally-not-Dracula.
The wait was definitely worth it! Good work!
Interesting Idea. Waiting for a release.
DIE FOR THE EMPEROR OR DIE TRYING!
More Toilet Seats!
Nope. Is it controversial? Yes. Is it violent? Yes. Is it obscene? Yes. Is it as violent, obscene and controversial as Manhunt or Postal? No. I think it's reputation comes solely that it involves killing people for no apparent reason. Something like Comlumbine or Sandyhook which always stirs controversy. Othe than that the game doesn't have much controversy to offer.
"This place is for actual debate, debate between different ideas which includes religions and atheism but you and that idiot Apone have always wanted to ban them simply because you cannot stand real debate or criticism of anything you hold to be true (you're still proving that)."
It that a way of saying you admit you have been an prick who tries to be offensive for attention?
"As for your links, what have they proven? That some of the images I've posted are provocative (like many in your own group) but actually contain CONSTRUCTIVE ARGUMENTS. So what's has that proved? None contain your examples about me talking about fedoras and autism (something you just made up). Or are you arguing that my images somehow make my arguments invalid? lel"
I wasn't aware "LOL FEDORAFAG" was a real argument but have it your way.
"There's no soul crushing irony in me turning your own imgur image back on you."
I accuse you of using fedora jokes to dismiss criticism and you dismiss my criticism with a fedora joke. Noice.
"Seeing as you have no intention of debating the subject, why don't you go back to your circle jerk group that doesn't debate and is next to dead?"
Aren't you the guy who killed this group in the first place and then made posts accusing the group of favoring atheists and the opposing side of trolling because you couldn't have it your way?
Have I ever call you a troll? Have I ever insulted you? You know, this place was for actual debate before you started making threads like that. The other place we have is good for most of us because we kept clear of such topics and for good reason. You won't see us making threads: "LEL are Christfags BRAINWUSHD?"
As for your first statement, I'll just leave those here:
And honestly, DO YOU NOT SEE THE SOUL CRUSHING IRONY IN POSTING THAT IMGUR LINK?
I'm not sure you are the proper man to tell us this since your whole contribution to this community can be summed up in this:
Add freelancer and you'll have my eternal loyalty
Are you new on the internet?
What would that be?
Seems not to work for undeveloped countries or the millions of people in the industry or people who just don't give a **** about animals.
Guess you haven't realized that's not gonna work for most of us.
I didn't realize you could go without food.
What scientists? This is so basic that you can find it browsing wikipedia or asking any veterinary or any man with a grasp of high school zoology.
I was actually talking about the generic troll since I can't explain where exactly are those ideas coming from?
Obviously atheism lacks moral authority! Who would define morality in Atheism? The Atheist Pope, the Atheist Bible? Was anyone trying to prove to you that? Talk about being trolled a little more than one could handle.
Animal rights: Harm doesn't refer only to physical damage. Most scientists agree that animals don't feel that comfortable when they are molested and that is harming them on the long term.
Pedophilia: CONSENT(not happening before adulthood)
I'm not sure what you believe. I personally believe that you've been trolled a little more than you can handle.
Do you notice a pattern here?
I don't condemn any of this things because of atheism.
If there is any point to be made here is that atheists claim to be good without god and not specifically because of a lack of god.
On another actually serious note:
INB4 λpone the phisically pleasing
That's pretty much it. I'm pretty sure the diversity in what counts as right or wrong in any religion definite proof for me that morality is subjective. We claim something is evil according to our own standards. Yes, Hitler believed he was a good man and whether I'm calling him evil because of my own beliefs or you're calling him evil because of yours(which are derived from Christianity) is irrelevant. There are people who think Hitler was right and people who think he was wrong. I personally believe he was wrong because I think killing is wrong because I think humans deserve to be treated good because I feel empathy towards my fellow man. I find it very difficult to witness others experience pain or misery. Some people don't but I am not them.
As far as necrophilia is concerned: I'm sure you and me find it disgusting but obviously there are people who don't. As long as their is consent(as in someone agreeing to offer their dead bodies) I'm afraid you and me can't have a say in this.
As far as "beastilty" is concerned: animal rights
As far as pedophilia is concerned: you know better than to bring this up
Played it. I think the game was took off steam because of it's (non-existent) quality. All this is, is a stupid little game. It's so over-the-top that no sane people will ever look at it and see anything but a joke. It's not even a good joke(and that's mostly because it's a very lame as far as content goes game). As far as political correctness goes, let me point you to this:
There will obviously be oversensitive people(SJWs, uberprogressives, feminists) that will take this far too seriously. The game is meant to be offensive and inflammatory and if it can start a discussion on the line between freedom of speech/expression and censorship then i think more was attained than lost.