jacksonj04 Blog

0 comments by jacksonj04 on Jun 29th, 2008 digg this super bookmark

I've had a couple of people ask how you do the cool images which stretch across the whole width of the content, as seen on news posts such as this one by the Infinity team (Used very well in that case). The answer is simple, providing that you understand at least the basic principles of HTML.

First of all, you need an image. It needs to be 620px wide, and we recommend no more than about 250px high or they become irritating, although any height will work. Sometimes smaller images have more effect or are more subtle, so bear that in mind.

Once that's done, you need hosting for the image. This can either be your own servers or you can head off and add it to your mod's image gallery. Either way you must know the URL for the full image, thumbnails will just look silly. If you're hosting your image on Mod DB you can get this URL by looking at an image in your gallery, then clicking "(view original)" by the title.

Finally, you need to enter HTML mode when you're editing your article and add a little bit of code to the bottom, replacing the src="" attribute with the URL, altering the alt="" attribute to be more descriptive, and tweaking height="" to actually be the correct height in pixels.

That's it. Note that your image won't appear perfectly in the editor -  don't panic about the gap around the left and bottom of your image, it won't appear on the final page.

So that's how you add the funky full-width images to your news posts. Told you it was easy.

0 comments by jacksonj04 on Jun 13th, 2008 digg this super bookmark

I was struggling to find something to blog about since it's about time for a new one from me. I had almost given up and was going to resort to a crash course on some of the advanced options for mod and game teams (It's coming in my next blog so I can have an even more in-depth look at some of them) when Scott gave us our two big new toys; high quality video and the new levels system.

High quality video is exactly as the name suggests. The video is now encoded with the frankly awesome H.264 codec instead of the somewhat ageing H.263, making for videos with sharper lines, better colour and all-round niceness. All conversion and switching between the new and old formats is handled entirely by our team of server monkeys, but there is still a little bit of fine tuning going on so if you spot any video glitches just let us know and we'll prod the settings so everything is excellent.

It's not quite HD yet, but it's something we're looking at for future expansion. Stay tuned.

Next up are our excellent replacement for Karma, something we've been promising to improve for a long time. After the combined efforts of several staff members couldn't find a decent set of equations for calculating karma without unfairly penalising some or rewarding others, we replaced it with a much more gaming-oriented and decidedly more fun system - levels.

Instead of a boring number telling you how good or bad some arbitrary maths somewhere thinks you are, your level is an indicator of your 'usefully-activeness', a phrase I've never heard before and should probably never use again. Instead of trying to base it around how many people say they like or dislike what you did - comment voting was a huge part of the old karma system - your levels are based on how much you do around the site that is then used by someone else.

Writing a tutorial is good and earns you activity, but if it's viewed by 5,000 people then you get even more activity from it. On the flip side, if your tutorial is so poor that it's not authed (or worse still deleted) by the staff then you're likely to get very little activity, or even have some removed. Activity points go towards increasing your levels from 1 to 70, each of which has a specific gaming/modding related rank name.

Don't get too excited about your level, it doesn't change anything around the site although in future we may choose to only let people above a certain level take part in things like feature betas or vote in contests. All in all it's just a bit of fun.

1 comment by jacksonj04 on May 23rd, 2008 digg this super bookmark

This blog is short and simple, and just answers the question "how do we delete things". The answer is we don't. Mod DB makes use of non-destructive deleting. Put simply, once something is on the site it is never truly deleted from our database.

The Mod DB Deleting MachineIt's all to make our lives easier. At one point our delete buttons did exactly as you'd expect and completely eradicated stuff from the database with no hope of retrieval short of going and digging around the backups, something nobody on the admin team wants to waste time doing since it's more of a pain to re-integrate the old content with the site than it is to just recreate it.

We then noticed that sometimes there were idiots within the community who maliciously deleted content from mods they were leaving (or more often were kicked out of), or mod leaders who deleted negative comments from their mods purely to help their PR image. We even had some moderators go on a power trip at one point and delete threads or content that wasn't supposed to be, and even for the pure of heart in both the community and the staff there's always the dreaded "oh dammit, I didn't mean to press that button!" which often leads to someone's hard-created content vanishing in a puff of digital smoke. So we started making the delete button only soft-delete things, mark them as 'deleted' in the database but still leave them intact so they could be retrieved later if we needed to.

v2 was the first version to implement the beginnings of this with an undelete feature for forum threads. v3 improved by making mods undeleteable, and now v4 has pretty much everything completely undeleteable even by high level staff without resorting to going and prodding the database manually (which nobody wants to do because the gerbils turning the wheels tend to bite). If something is 'deleted' we can always get it back again.

Told you it was simple.

0 comments by jacksonj04 on May 16th, 2008 digg this super bookmark

A couple of observant people have asked why we don't process our news articles in a strictly chronological order - ie sometimes we authorise newer news posts before older ones. There isn't a huge conspiracy and we haven't perfected our time travel device yet, it's purely a matter of balancing what's coming in at one end (the submissions) with what goes out the other end (the front page news) whilst keeping a good mix of interesting stuff.

We get lots of news coming through the system every day, and obviously can't put all of it on the front page or people would get fed up of news vanishing within mere hours, sometimes only to be replaced with total rubbish. As a result we have our editing queue and try to keep a steady flow of articles without overburdening you, and this means we can't always give a yes/no decision on an article straight away. Let me explain further.

Our editing queue.Excellent news articles are authed for front page display immediately, no questions asked. They then appear on the front page straight away (There's some complex buffering and caching going on here, but it's usually pretty quick). At the other end of the scale are the posts that don't deserve front page exposure, the "looking for a coder" and "we've just started" posts. These are relegated to profiles only. Then there are those in the middle which are good enough for the front page, but don't leap out and grab your attention.

On a really good news day, we have loads of excellent articles and so we don't need many of the good-enough articles to keep a steady flow. Conversely, on a bad day we're often forced to lower the barrier to entry in order to keep the front page content fresh. More commonly we have a mix of the excellent and the good-enough, carefully blended to make sure you're not swamped with model renders or too much text (And you thought we just did it all at random). As a result of trying to keep this mix our editors often leave some of the good-enough articles in the queue so that they can be picked up later if we have a drop in excellent submissions, or need something to break the monotony. Since the news articles are sorted by date, sometimes you'll see a 'new' article appear under one you've seen before or see an article posted after yours make it out of the editing queue first.

We aim for pieces of news to spend no longer than six hours in the queue even if they're in the good-enough category, and try to get as much news as possible on the front page.

I hope that's cleared up another point of how Mod DB works behind the scenes and how we make sure we're the best site for mod news. 

0 comments by jacksonj04 on May 8th, 2008 digg this super bookmark

As some of you may have spotted, I haven't been as vocal as I used to around the site over the past 6 months or so. This is because - as some of you may know - I've headed off to university to study Computing and Cybernetics. I have now finished my first year, and can devote my time to managing bits of Mod DB again.

Unfortunately I seemed to come back to somewhat of a mess with regards to the community I am meant to be managing. I acknowledge this is a lot down to my absence, but also a lot down to a quirk of the human mind which is expressed as something called Dunbar's Number - the maximum number of stable inter-personal relationships which a person can manage in a given scenario or social group. It's about 150 people, past which point relationships start to become strained and stricter rules are required to keep growing communities in check since they lose the self-policing attitude of smaller groups.

Unlike in earlier versions where the regular members of the site all new each other and regularly communicated via the forums, Mod DB has now reached the point where there are so many people engaging in regular social activity on the site that the 'common community' feeling is starting to crack in places. This may not be an entirely bad thing; for starters it shows that the site is growing up. It encourages people to find things which appeal to their personal tastes and expertise rather than just being thrown into the melting pot. v4's groups feature helps this along by providing a stronger sense of community for the groups of a few tens or hundreds than the site of a few hundred thousand whilst still keeping them plugged into the community as a whole.

The green ones are off!On the downside, it means you're more likely to be dragged out of your comfort zone and into a group that you are unfamiliar with. As I write, Mod DB has 248,390 registered members and although not all of them are active it's still a big pond to be thrown into as a new member, or even as an old member who's been left outside of one of the newly forming cliques. I used to know the first names all the 'regular' members of Mod DB, where they lived, how their families were and so on. Now I struggle to remember which member I'm talking to or to keep tabs on how peoples reputations are doing, which is a bad sign for a Community Manager. I'm hoping to improve it with an increased presence now I've regained my life, but it serves to highlight that this site has definitely grown out of its own comfort zone and is now starting the inevitable break up into smaller, more specialised social groups within the Mod DB framework.

It's up to not just me and the rest of the staff to keep up, but you as well. We're not standing still, and we can't stay the small close-knit community we once were.

0 comments by jacksonj04 on Feb 25th, 2008 digg this super bookmark

In recent days I've seen a few people around the site having a moan about their comments being buried due to downvoting. In some cases this has been a justified moaning, but in the vast majority it seems to be a case of people throwing a wobbler because their comment was - for want of a better word suitable for a family audience - rubbish, and the community picked up on this.

I'll start by addressing the concerns of those who had justifiable moaning. We know the Karma system for comment promotion/burying isn't quite perfect, and it is undergoing tuning on our development version of the site (We had all kinds of weird numbers coming out of it when Scott broke some of the maths). When it's working properly, people who persistently vote against the grain, or only vote down will have their 'weight' reduced accordingly, whereas the more useful voters will become worth more. At the moment the only thing stopping these idiots are the community, who seem to respond well to people saying their comment has been unfairly squashed and restoring it to a sensible place. This will also be taken into account in the final Karma system, working as a second check against rogue down-voters whereby people whose votes are persistently undone will lose weight.

As a final word of advice however, remember that until we implement this system in the public site your Karma scores are nothing more than the product of a bit of maths and have no affect on your rights around the site, your social status, or your needs to buy enhancements from those spam emails you keep getting. And yes, when we do implement it we will probably retroactively re-process the entirety of Karma issued so far to get it working right.

To the people who just post bad comments and then complain when they're buried. The system in these cases is working exactly as it's designed and although you may think your comment was amazing everybody else didn't. If you find your comments being constantly buried then I recommend taking a look at other highly voted comments and looking for differences between them and your own. People generally don't vote opinions down (We do check these things) unless they're wrapped in an overall bad comment. Look at things like length, spelling, your use of English, and how useful the comment is. "I agree" isn't going to win any points.

Finally, I'd like to thank everybody (You know who you are) who has helped us in our fine-tuning by reporting silly scores or obvious malicious voting. There are hundreds of comments around the site daily and we can't keep tabs on all the activity but with you pointing out places it's gone wrong it's much easier for us to get our algorithms absolutely right. As usual we're still looking for instances of bad scoring, so if you spot any please give me a PM.

0 comments by jacksonj04 on Jan 18th, 2008 digg this super bookmark

The observant amongst you may have noticed a brand new button at the top of the page, next to your username and updates counter. Yep, PMs are back with the full v4 treatment.

We've taken some of the cool new features such as threaded commenting and groups, turned them around a bit and stuck them to the PM system. This means that you no longer end up with huge rambling conversations taking up your inbox, they all stay together in one big conversation. You can even have two conversations with the same person going on at the same time without getting too confused. However, the best thing is the way we deal with messaging groups.

If you send a PM to a mod team or group using the convenient link in their profile (Down the right hand side) then your message is not only sent to the entire mod team, but everybody is connected in the same conversation. The same happens if you address a PM to more than one person - everybody can see the entire conversation and all the replies in one place without the need to manually piece through the entire thing and see who replied to who and when.

It's been a bit slow coming we know, but we think it'll be worth it. I know I've had a fair few PMs already, and it's nice to be able to keep tabs on everything at once.

Still to come: Forums and Help Wanted. MotY is slowing us down a bit, but as soon as that's over (It'll be well worth the wait) we'll be back to full speed development. 

3 comments by jacksonj04 on Nov 30th, 2007 digg this super bookmark

There have, in recent weeks, been a few interesting bits of games reporting going on. Allegedly, a games reviewer working for a major gaming site may have been fired due to a less than perfect review of a game. I'd like to take a brief opportunity to state Mod DB's stance on things like this:

Since we primarily review mods and indie games, having huge publishers breathing down our necks isn't a problem. We (And you, since we let you write reviews as well) can quite happily say what we like about content. As long as it's justified in the review and has had more than a token glance at spelling and grammar, it's fair game to be published on Mod DB.

We include ratings from 0 to 10 on the basis that people may want to use them - and we have no problem with you rating something as terrible even if we advertise for it. If they complain about our community ratings and demand their latest 'masterpiece' is rated higher, they can advertise somewhere else. 

0 comments by jacksonj04 on Nov 22nd, 2007 digg this super bookmark

Since joining Mod DB I have seen a lot of changes - from small ones like introducing a space into the name (We used to be ModDB) through to big ones like the first image galleries, and the very first MotY. However, I reckon the biggest change for a long time has come with v4's new community-oriented features.

Modding and indie gaming is an activity which thrives off being in contact with other people. Whereas large commercial titles can survive off endless marketing budgets, a mod can only become known through people spreading the news. Mod DB aims to make this process easier, but you still can't escape the fact you need interested people. So, why communities?

We introduced Groups and Friends for a few reasons. Firstly, Groups are used for all our development team information. Look again though, and you'll find a collection of fan groups and common interest groups. With Friends, people with common friends tend to have common interests and tastes in gaming. This gives us a huge pool of information we can start to tap into in finding out exactly what you're looking for.

Mod DB v4 has so far spent the vast majority of its life on bits of paper whilst how it worked was fine tuned, and this means we can make it do some very clever things. For example, once we solve the major issues with v4 (Like forums and help wanted, which incidentally also do some community things) then we'll begin work on some rather clever behind-the-scenes wizardry to better provide you with what we reckon you'll like. Of course you can turn it off if you aren't interested, but imagine having the news you see carefully weighted based on what you and your friends watch. Perhaps having personalised recommendations, where you simply say "Find me a single-player mod I'll enjoy" and we go and look at the groups you're part of, mods you watch, things your friends have rated highly, and then pick out something which your own 'community' has said is worth playing. Say "I want a new map" and we'll pluck out something which is highly recommended by the people you play with, not just the community as a whole.

To put it another way, we don't want to just be a place to find mods any more (Although we still want to be the best at doing that), we want to find ways to help you play something different without dredging through a hundred mods you aren't interested in. We don't want to just be a place to find mod news, we want to make sure you see what you're going to be interested in. Above all, we don't want to be the place which just blindly feeds you reviews like "This mod is cool". We want to be able to tell you "We thought, everybody else thought, your friends thought".

Once we can do that, every mod, game and addon can be promoted straight to the people who want to play it. Your 16-bit action masterpiece with amazing gameplay will no longer languish at the bottom of the list - the people who play retro games will see it weighted above the next-gen RPGs they don't care about. Then they tell their friends... and it goes on.

So, in answer to those who've asked us "Why add Friends and Groups?" - I think it's pretty obvious. Easier for players to get content they want. Easier for developers to get the players they want. Win-win.

107 comments by jacksonj04 on Nov 11th, 2007 digg this super bookmark

Hi everyone,
For those who are new and those who just don't know me, I'd like to introduce myself again. I'm Nick, aka jacksonj04, and I'm one of the site managers here at Mod DB. I'm also the guy responsible for making sure you - the community - are happy, content, and know how to make the best use of the site.

As you've probably noticed, Mod DB has recently moved into this new version - v4. It's changed. A lot. So, I'm here to help answer a few questions and solve a few problems which have cropped up since we launched.

What's happened?

Mod DB has been upgraded from v3 to v4. It's a big change in how we organise things, and a big change to how a few things work. It's also a lot more of the same - we still support independent game development including mods and indie games, we still want to help you find new things to play, and we still want to help developers to show off.

The new things include (but aren't limited to) personal blogs, better connection of content, multiple platform support, and better support for development groups and indie games.

What are these 'link' things?

Linking is v4's big feature, but like an iceberg you only see the tip of it. It's something we've been planning and working on in some form since v2, and it works like this:

You can now connect things in ways you couldn't before. Whereas in v3 you couldn't create a mod of a mod, or an addon for a mod, you now can simply by adding the appropriate link. You can also add links to groups and engines (More on those later), or to more than one item of content, which is very handy when you write reviews.

Where has my mod team gone?

We've replaced mod teams with our new Groups feature (See below). Because Groups is a lot more powerful than the old mod teams, we've decided to not automatically create them to give you the opportunity to get it right instead of having to fix our mistakes. If you've somehow been thrown out of a mod you administer, let me know and I'll fix it for you.

OK, so what are Groups?

I'll start with describing the new social features in Mod DB, as that deals with Groups. We realised a while back that the best development happens when you can connect with other people to share skills and ideas. With v3 we told people seeking this to go to the forums, but in v4 we decided to leap on the social networking bandwagon and introduce two features: Friends and Groups.

Friends is exactly as it sounds - it's a personal list of the people you want to keep in touch with. We're looking at new ways of using Friends for things such as recommendations ("Your friends were interested in...") or improved searching, but for now it's a simple list.

Groups is how we deal with a few things, and is one of v4's biggest improvements. A group is a collection of people, which can be used for almost anything. If you're a development team, just create a group for it. Inside the group's control panel you'll find options for letting people add content, adding members, and customising your profile. When you've added members, you can fine tune their permissions for adding and editing content. When you edit your mod's (Or game's) profile, you'll find you can select your group as the developer. This then uses Linking to tie the two together. If your team develops two mods, just set them as the developer for both.

You can also use Groups for finding people of the same interest, for example by creating a "Source Developers" group or a "Concept Artists" group. Finally, we also use Groups to deal with some official things such as the "Ex-Staff" group and "Old-Timers" group.

Where has my modWatch gone?

Nowhere. Your modWatch is still intact, but now lives under Updates. We've expanded the system so that you can now watch almost anything across the site, and have everything delivered to one place. All the mods you were watching will now create a new update for you when something happens.

Being able to watch anything is really nice - if you find a user who writes interesting blogs then you can watch them and see when they add new content. Likewise if you're a developer interested in the Unreal 3 engine, you can watch the engine and be notified of new features and news articles about it.

A few people have asked for some form of list of what they're subscribed to. Whilst you don't really need to know this, as they only bother you when there are actual updates (At which point you get an easy stop watching link anyway) we'll be releasing a change in the next couple of days so you can see everything in your Updates page.

Why are some things missing or still the v3 version?

There are a few reasons for this. Firstly a few things simply weren't ready in time. The forums, for example, are still being rewritten to tie better into features such as Friends (Wouldn't it be nice to see your friends opinions in one place?). Other features are waiting to see how you use v4. Help Wanted may end up being tied to groups, or user profiles, or something else depending on how the community (You) use what's already there. Finally the video feature is simply waiting for the hardware to be fine-tuned, since this is something we can't do without content.

At the moment the big missing features are private messages, help wanted and topsites. Video is being implemented as I write and should be available soon. The forums are still running on v3, and will be moved to v4 when they're fully updated. All these features are high on our to-do list, and they are all at least partially in place. Expect to see them in the next couple of weeks, starting with private messaging and video.

XYZ has lost its formatting!

We know, and we've got our team of content monkeys fixing things as I type.

Game XYZ isn't linked properly!

We know that as well. Again, our content monkeys are busy working though the list of games and adding engines and groups as appropriate.

You're missing game/engine/group XYZ!

Go add it. Unlike v3, all members can now add content including games, engines and groups. Don't be alarmed if we suddenly wrest control of big names from you though. If you add a group for id Software, it's possible that one of our editors will step in and tidy it up because it's a big name. On the other hand, if you do a good job we'll leave you alone to run it.

So I can add more stuff now?

Yes, and we encourage you to do it! If you want to write a review, a blog post or an article just go and do it. If it meets our quality standards, we may well pick it to be featured on the front page. You may even be hand-picked by our editors to join our writing team.

You haven't helped me. I still have an unanswered question.

Ask it by posting a comment on this blog entry. I'll reply in person, and then sometime next week I'll collect them all into another update like this one.

All that's left for me to say is "go have fun".

Nick "jacksonj04" Jackson
Site Manager