This member has provided no bio about themself...

Comment History  (60 - 90 of 525)
(2142)Gen.Reaper Mar 23 2013, 9:38am says:

It seems that melee combat crashes the game.

-1 votes   download: The Great War 1918 v1.0 (outdated)
(2142)Gen.Reaper Mar 23 2013, 9:35am says:

So are you going to be able to build non-sandbag walls in 3.7?

+2 votes   media: Hungarian base
(2142)Gen.Reaper Mar 13 2013, 1:12pm says:

I thought I heard somewhere you guys weren't going to have the Sturmtiger?

+1 vote   media: Elite Army Group Command Tree
(2142)Gen.Reaper Mar 11 2013, 11:37am says:

How can the Tans attack the Green Nation all the time if they're not even BORDERING each other unless they take control of the Indigo, Black, Cyan, Red, and Purple Nations first?

+1 vote   media: Army Men III Wallpaper - World Map
(2142)Gen.Reaper Mar 11 2013, 1:38am says:

Tanks seem to be a little too big.
Here's something to look at:
The Army Men tanks are based of the M48.

+1 vote   media: Army Men III Wallpaper - The Coalition
(2142)Gen.Reaper Mar 4 2013, 11:54pm says:

I think historically the swastika was never placed on vehicles except for the Afrika Korps(although that was pretty small). The Germans mostly placed the Balkan Cross on their ground vehicles vehicles during the war.

Although there is a few photos of Panzers with the nazi flag over the engine, it wasn't common practice to place the swastika on ground vehicles.

+1 vote   media: Пустынный камуфляж
(2142)Gen.Reaper Mar 2 2013, 9:58am says:

Leopard 2A7.

+3 votes   media: Challenge #X
(2142)Gen.Reaper Feb 27 2013, 9:25am says:

The GDI Vulcan turrets are kind of weak, they could use a range and firepower buff.

+1 vote   mod: Tiberian Apocalypse
(2142)Gen.Reaper Feb 26 2013, 1:05am says:

Is this even Wh40k? Because last time I checked, there wasn't a human faction or Imperial Guard regiment called the U.N.A.

+2 votes   media: Pic dump 2
(2142)Gen.Reaper Feb 25 2013, 2:13am replied:

Girls Und Panzer I think.

+3 votes   media: have some tanks
(2142)Gen.Reaper Feb 22 2013, 1:44pm says:

I recall the Modern Warfare mod doing something similar with their Chinese supply trucks, but it didn't have the canvas covers over the back. So the ROTR team isn't the first to come up with it.

But I never really got why you couldn't do it in the first place in vanilla Generals/ZH.

+1 vote   media: Chinese Supply Truck
(2142)Gen.Reaper Feb 14 2013, 7:13am replied:

SHIR 2 I'm guessing.

+5 votes   media: Challenger 3
(2142)Gen.Reaper Feb 14 2013, 6:57am says:

Either a Challenger or SHIR 2.

+5 votes   media: Challenger 3
(2142)Gen.Reaper Feb 12 2013, 1:13pm says:

Super M60 Prototype

+11 votes   media: Challenge #12
(2142)Gen.Reaper Feb 10 2013, 9:19am says:

So any chance of seeing any other Imperial Guard regiments like the Praetorian Guards, Mordian Iron Guard, Finreht Highlanders, and the Valhallan Ice Warriors?

And are you planning to expand on the Tallarn Desert Raiders a bit? They're a bit a lacking.

+3 votes   mod: OFPWH40K
(2142)Gen.Reaper Feb 7 2013, 8:12pm replied:

It's dead(and pretty old, It may not work anymore), but here:

There was also a CnC3 version, but only a basic beta was ever released and it was pretty buggy.

+3 votes   media: Only War mod (Generals ZH)
(2142)Gen.Reaper Feb 3 2013, 12:27am says:

Personally I would prefer the Stryker MGS to be the US' primary battle tank and the Abrams to be the Heavy Battle Tank like the Paladin like you said.

The Stryker MGS is currently the closest thing you can get to a light tank in the US' arsenal nowadays.

+1 vote   media: US Crusader Tank
(2142)Gen.Reaper Jan 24 2013, 10:38pm says:

It looks EXACTLY like an Abrams!

+6 votes   media: Z-3 without cammo netting.
(2142)Gen.Reaper Jan 24 2013, 9:37pm says:

Hell is there even a such thing as diplomacy in the Wh40k universe?

+2 votes   media: Diplomatic Solutions
(2142)Gen.Reaper Jan 16 2013, 2:35am says:

South African TTD. Tank Technology Demonstrator.

+3 votes   media: Challange #10.
(2142)Gen.Reaper Jan 16 2013, 2:22am says:

Either a early Abrams, Leopard, or Challenger prototype.

+2 votes   media: Challange #10.
(2142)Gen.Reaper Jan 13 2013, 7:45pm replied:

Same here.

+2 votes   download: Tiberian Sun Redux 0.5 [Installer]
(2142)Gen.Reaper Jan 13 2013, 3:10am replied:

The concept behind the Maus was outdated by the end of World War II due to the increasing lethality of ground attack aircraft and medium tanks were slowly becoming the MBTs for the major nations, so the Russians would've had no use for it after the war.

+4 votes   media: Maus heavy tank
(2142)Gen.Reaper Jan 11 2013, 8:33pm says:

It was actually the Germans that did this to prevent it's capture by the Russians, the turret is what we now see on the one that's on display in the Kublinka Museum.

+15 votes   media: Maus heavy tank
(2142)Gen.Reaper Jan 2 2013, 2:46pm replied:

I think so.

+6 votes   media: Panzer VIII Maus
(2142)Gen.Reaper Jan 2 2013, 1:48pm replied:

Yes but most Shermans were armed with 75mms while a fewer number were given the 76mms. While by 1944, the T-34/85 along with the IS-1/2 had became the primary tanks of the Russian army and were being produced in large numbers while the IS-3 was just starting to enter production.

+1 vote   media: Decoy Inflatable Army Tank
(2142)Gen.Reaper Dec 31 2012, 10:55am replied:

Well according to what've I've read some commanders did want a 90mm fitted onto the Sherman, but Mcnair refused since he was determined to maintain the Tank Destroyer doctrine(aka TDs took on the enemy's tanks while the tanks themselves took on the infantry). Hell he didn't even really want the 76mm fitted onto the Sherman and somebody thankfully overridden him on that as well.

The only reason that the Pershing ever reached Europe was because Mcnair died in the the Battle of the Bulge and General Marshall overridden him.

+2 votes   media: M4 Sherman w/ Pershing-style turret and 90mm gun
(2142)Gen.Reaper Dec 30 2012, 3:33pm replied:

Probably since I doubt a regular sherman's suspension would've been able to handle the recoil from the 90mm or the weight of the turret.

+5 votes   media: M4 Sherman w/ Pershing-style turret and 90mm gun
(2142)Gen.Reaper Dec 30 2012, 2:11pm replied:

Yeah if the Allies had to fight the Soviets directly after World War 2, the Sherman wouldn't been no match for the T-34/85 since it was available in larger numbers, had better armor,and a far superior armament.

But the Allies probably would have rushed the Pershing into mass production to counter it or just equip the Sherman with a larger gun(there was a Sherman equipped with a 90mm and the Pershing's turret, but it never entered service).

+2 votes   media: Decoy Inflatable Army Tank
(2142)Gen.Reaper Dec 29 2012, 5:41pm says:

People keep slamming the Sherman down, but they forget that it wasn't designed to fight enemy tanks, it was initially designed to fight and support infantry while TDs like the Hellcat, Jackson, and Wolverine took on the tanks.

The only reason why the Sherman was never replaced was because it could be easily mass produced and the war ended before any of it's possible replacements(Including the Pershing) could get into service.

+6 votes   media: Decoy Inflatable Army Tank
Offline Since
Jul 3, 2015
United States United States
Member Watch
Track this member
Comment Statistics
Posts per day