This group is for everyone who like tanks, sci-fi tanks, real tanks, funny tanks, you can put here tank mods, tank maps, simply everything with straps, armor and gun :D

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
Tiger I vs IS-2
embed
share
view previous next
 
Post comment Comments
Panzert
Panzert Apr 1 2012, 7:43am says:

Obviously the IS-2 is superior to the Tiger I, it was built to counter it...

However in theory the Tiger could still win a 1 on 1 due to a number of factors which I won't mention because it'll just drag out.

+6 votes     reply to comment
GriffinZ
GriffinZ Apr 1 2012, 9:24am replied:

both can penetrate frontal armour of the others right?, but Tiger have pretty much better RoF, while IS-2 is hampered with shell drop me heard. IS-2 is manly for blasting stuff to smithereens, not a tank killer.

+4 votes     reply to comment
Panzert
Panzert Apr 1 2012, 6:05pm replied:

Yeah, the main gun of the IS-2 was pretty much made for destroying defences. Though when they did manage to get a hit on a Tiger, it was pretty devastating.

+4 votes     reply to comment
rkraptor70
rkraptor70 Apr 1 2012, 8:31am says:

Its going to be quite simply a "who hits who first" battle IMO.

+4 votes     reply to comment
Panzert
Panzert Apr 1 2012, 8:39am replied:

Also very much depends on where the Tiger hits the IS-2. Pretty sure frontally it was invulnerable to the 88 L/56 at certain distances. The IS-2s problem was that it had poor optics combined with the fact that it could only average 2-3 rounds per minute. And iirc it only carried 8 AT rounds.

I said I wouldn't go into detail, but I couldn't help it. :P

+7 votes     reply to comment
rkraptor70
rkraptor70 Apr 1 2012, 8:58am replied:

Like I said, If the Tiger can outmaneuver(Tiger is more mobile than IS-2) and hit the IS-2 in ts weak spot(Side armor, engine ETC) then the battle is over. And if the IS-2 can get a direct hit at the Tiger hull than its the other way around.

+2 votes     reply to comment
Panzert
Panzert Apr 1 2012, 6:01pm replied:

Pretty much.

+2 votes     reply to comment
Da7K
Da7K Apr 2 2012, 1:59am replied:

But, most of the time the Tiger can't outmaneuver the IS-2 because they always has rear guard of some T-34 tanks.

And it is rare to see an IS-2 going alone without another IS-2 or support of T-34-85 tanks.

+2 votes     reply to comment
GriffinZ
GriffinZ Apr 3 2012, 12:47pm replied:

well tiger could use APCR rounds, which of course was very rare but could probably be saved for such an epic clash of the titans :D

+2 votes     reply to comment
N3mesis
N3mesis Dec 16 2012, 4:10pm replied:

You don't need to penetrate a tank in order to kill the crew. That said the Tiger will gain the upper hand in an 1o1. Because of better accuracy and fire rate. The Tigers and in particually German tanks had an Lower MMP and NMP. That making them more mobile than Shermans, IS2, or Pershings etc.

+1 vote     reply to comment
CadianConscript
CadianConscript Apr 2 2012, 8:51am says:

Well, given the factor that Germans were the better tacticians and had more often than not better trained crew members... I'd put my money on the Tiger.

+2 votes     reply to comment
evilreflex
evilreflex Apr 3 2012, 1:00pm replied:

And that's why they have lost 2 wars! xD

+2 votes     reply to comment
Panzert
Panzert Apr 3 2012, 9:08pm replied:

'tacticians' being the key word there. ;)

+1 vote     reply to comment
CadianConscript
CadianConscript Apr 4 2012, 4:17am replied:

Well to put it simple - Germans went for 'Quality over quantity' while the USSR went for 'Quality of the quantity'. I'm sure you'll spot the difference there =)

+1 vote     reply to comment
GriffinZ
GriffinZ Apr 3 2012, 5:49pm says:

I like to see it this way: Austria lost the war for Germany :D

Umad country which Hitler came from? :D:D

+3 votes     reply to comment
GhOsT11
GhOsT11 Apr 9 2012, 3:58am says:

If it wasn't for Hitler we would be speaking German right now.

+4 votes     reply to comment
N3mesis
N3mesis Dec 16 2012, 4:06pm says:

The IS2 canon was poor didnt had the accuracy the Tigers 88 had. Also the 88 and the Panthers 75mm both had superior penetrating capabilities, the 75mm was even better. The IS2s advantage was the HE, it could pack a devasting punch. The IS2 gun was actually an Arty equpiment.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Post a Comment
click to sign in

You are not logged in, your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) which we encourage all contributors to do.

2000 characters limit; HTML formatting and smileys are not supported - text only

Description

What do you think? Which one is better? Two fear-inspiring giants of WW2.

Image Details
Type
Entertainment
Date
Apr 1st, 2012
By
Perun58
Size
1076×283
Options
URL
Embed (big)
Embed
Share
Report Abuse
Report media
Add Media
Members only