This group is for everyone who like tanks, sci-fi tanks, real tanks, funny tanks, you can put here tank mods, tank maps, simply everything with straps, armor and gun :D

T-72 rush
embed
share
view previous
Share Image
Share on Facebook Post Email a friend
Embed Image
Post comment Comments
SlayerX3
SlayerX3 - - 2,448 comments

A-10's wet dream...

Reply Good karma Bad karma+13 votes
Jkl22d
Jkl22d - - 687 comments

yes indeed

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
RK44
RK44 - - 3,245 comments

This is one of the failure of the soviets
they are slow to realize that tank rush is no longer effective especially with the existence of rpg,helicopters,and at planes while they are thinking to make more tanks to overwhelm the enemy the americans are thinking how to kill the tanks and then the apache is born and let's not forget every tank commander worse nightmare the A-10 even so if the soviets gets its grips with the American IF the did with weak t-55 or t-72 tanks pretty much they will get cut down pretty easily

Reply Good karma Bad karma-2 votes
SunnyBittern
SunnyBittern - - 638 comments

Punctuation my friend, look it up.
Also, tank's would also be accompanied my AA vehicles, IFV's and Air support. No person with military experienced would send tanks alone in a rush, thats just retarded.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+8 votes
The_Integral
The_Integral - - 217 comments

Aye, no experienced general would do that, but the Soviets had the bad habit of positioning politicians to lead their troops. Voroshilov even stepped it up a notch during the Winter War, by not only sending tanks in alone, he didn't even give them orders for what to do if they broke through(and since Soviet tanks of the era didn't have radios, this meant they just ended up milling around uselessly behind Finnish lines until they were all finally picked off).

Plus, the Russians made the same basic mistake of sending in tanks with insufficient support at Grozny in 1994.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
GriffinZ
GriffinZ - - 4,719 comments

Indeed, the Soviets would utilize the blitzkrieg doctrine, and I'm fairly sure they would cut through the NATO lines before NATO would been able to put up a counter force (because Brittish tanks was in UK, french in france, all eastern blocks vehicles and planes however would be at the front line.

Reply Good karma Bad karma-3 votes
Baineblade
Baineblade - - 33 comments

Heeey Griffinz....yeeeaaaah, you're forgetting about the 5 or 6 German and American Armor Brigades in Germany, the huge Euro forces that were at all times on standby ready, aaaand the vast network of counterattack plans the U.S. and her allies had during the cold war.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+5 votes
SuomiKeizari
SuomiKeizari - - 111 comments

baine... almost the whole RED ARMY was there! you cant compare it with few armor brigades! + US has a ocean between europe and it, Russia didn't. and don't forget eastern europe that was almost as well armed as the soviet host. it was like 5 to 10 soviet tanks against 1 Nato one.

Reply Good karma Bad karma0 votes
Woozle
Woozle - - 2,617 comments

Hey I send tanks alone in a rush unaccompanied, but only if they are mammoth or apocalypse tanks.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
SuomiKeizari
SuomiKeizari - - 111 comments

so you were the one in WW3? oh damn i forgot, IT NEVER HAPPENED! when was the last time there was 2 STRONG i mean REALLY strong opponents on each others back on a grand scale war? oh yeah now i remember, WW2! was there tank rushes? YES!

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
FoxFort
FoxFort - - 1,552 comments

I think those are T-80s.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
SinnerForgiven
SinnerForgiven - - 82 comments

Yes, those are T-80s.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Post a comment

Your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community. Or sign in with your social account:

Description

prepare your anus, europe.... prepare it.