A place where ModDB members can debate civilly, and learn from each other's views.

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
Media RSS Feed Report media Shakespeare: Plagiarist? (view original)
Shakespeare: Plagiarist?
embed
share
view previous next
 
Post comment Comments
Medusa_Zenovka
Medusa_Zenovka May 31 2013, 10:18am says:

He was taking inspiration.

+6 votes     reply to comment
CommanderDef
CommanderDef May 31 2013, 10:30am says:

You can't think about it that way. Literature started on mythology, while myths were exchanged, traded, modernized and upgraded by all civilizations.

0 votes     reply to comment
ComradeWinston
ComradeWinston May 31 2013, 12:33pm says:

Anonymous( Imdb.com ) is a pretty good movie about Shakespeare. Its fictional but I still liked it. And who cares if he did, I mostly found his stuff annoying in school up until a month before I left. Tons of things are just iterations of similar things just made better, why should literature be any different?

+5 votes     reply to comment
ElfFriend
ElfFriend May 31 2013, 6:28pm says:

I don't understand why Shakespear is regarded as a great writer since there are many better stories than what he wrote....

+1 vote     reply to comment
Medusa_Zenovka
Medusa_Zenovka May 31 2013, 9:27pm replied:

Just because some might be better doesnt mean that he is a bad author.

+3 votes     reply to comment
KnightofEquulei
KnightofEquulei Jun 1 2013, 11:06am replied:

I enjoyed Romeo and Juliet. Normally most young people say they hate Shakespere because they had to study one of the plays but I enjoyed the story even if the ending could have been avoided if someone in it was a bit more intelligent. Personally I blame the priest geezer.

+5 votes     reply to comment
ElfFriend
ElfFriend Jun 1 2013, 7:54pm replied:

I think most people blame the priest... the teacher asked us at the end who we thought was the most at fault, and almost everyone chose the priest.

+3 votes     reply to comment
CrazyOldTeenager
CrazyOldTeenager Jun 1 2013, 9:52am says:

The only form of plagiarism in Shakespeare's writing were references to other literary works of art. While some today lack proper appreciation for his work, in his day, it was a masterpiece. It still is, if you look at it from an unbiased and contextual viewpoint.

+4 votes     reply to comment
ElfFriend
ElfFriend Jun 1 2013, 8:00pm replied:

but the thing that made shakespeare's stories good was the idea of catharsis. back then people couldn't see the latest horrible news to remind themselves that their lives don't suck that much compared to someone else. instead they had to watch plays where the characters lives sucked more than their lives. I personally don't support the idea that you have to see someone else suffering to appreciate what you have, which is why i gave up on the dieing TV platform and on news from major corporations.

+1 vote     reply to comment
InsanityPays
InsanityPays Jun 1 2013, 4:21pm says:

You'd have to remember that no one really is "original". Everything is stolen from somewhere.

+7 votes     reply to comment
Post a Comment
click to sign in

You are not logged in, your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) which we encourage all contributors to do.

2000 characters limit; HTML formatting and smileys are not supported - text only

Description

Over the centuries, William Shakespeare has been accused of plagiarism on grounds that he pirated plots, phrases, lines of verse, and even entire poems.
Some examples include exerts in his pieces from Ovid, Plautus, Boccaccio, Cinthio, Thomas Lodge, Arthur Brooke, Christopher Marlowe, and Robert Greene.
Would it be wrong to accuse him of plagiarism? Or is it just taking inspiration?

Image Details
Type
Entertainment
Date
May 31st, 2013
Size
1943×2490
Options
URL
Embed (big)
Embed
Share
Report Abuse
Report media
Add Media
Members only