A group for those without religion, as well as those who oppose it. Atheism and Agnosticism and Anti-theism.
Ha ha ha ha :D!
Science proves Creationism. Here's how;
From a logical point of view, there are only two possibilitys of how life originated.
Possibility One; that a bunch of atoms somehow came together perfectly to form DNA, , Enzymes, all of the different parts of a cell, all at once, all in the same place. Not only did these things come together so perfectly that the cell could consume/use energy, it could also reproduce itself. The chance of all of this happening, all at the same time, is incredibly small. Usually something in science with a extremely small chance of happening is referred to as “impossible.”
Possibility Two; God created everything. There isn't much of a obvious scientific way to prove or disprove this other than what i'm about to type here.
So, two possibility.
The first, abiogenesis, disproved itself with being against extremely long odds. Which, by process of elimination, only leaves creationism, proving that God is real.
Ah... Aaaahhh... No, dont hurt me!... Stop the **** it!... Aaaahh.... It hurts!...
If you just wanted to give us a kick to our shinbones, you have done a really good job, at least to me.
But if you just showed how well you know the scientific hypothesis of abiogenesis, then you just deserved an impossibly well synchronized facepalm from use with a global echo. Remember Bart Simpsons Megaphone test? Something like that. I guess you will figure out why.
Alright then, YOUR WRONG
But seriously you're wrong, and we've already had a long winded argument about this on the debating society forum.
If you must, take it there, but I'm tired of debating and I'd recommend you at least skim through my previous arguments.
i wasn't saying any complex organism, just one single, “simple” cell. All of the cell's components would have to be at the same place, at the same time, do their jobs as their supposed to, ect. The chance that all of this happens correctly are extremely small.
FYI i did get what your saying in your analogy.
edit; hmm, apparently i didn't hit reply to comment:/
So maybe this will help you a bit to understand it:
hmm, watched both videos. a single cell needs millions of the different components mentioned in order to be complete, and all of them would have to be exactly correct in order for the cell have the things it needs to live. It would also have to come to life somehow. im still liking my odds
Those vids also explained how it works.
"It would also have to come to life somehow."
No, because it is already at that point. Magical word: chemical reactions. Also watch part 3:
It wasn't exactly *poof* then cells. First there would need to be self-replictaing molecules, it's a little more complex than you might think.
Wrong. Very wrong. Mitochondria were separate from eukaryote cells at first, as a form of bacteria. The other organules were formed over time from what I know. Lipids tend to form pro-cell membranes under the right conditions, and Aminoacids are abundant in the universe.
Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.