A group for those without religion, as well as those who oppose it.

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
The Old Age Argument
view previous next
Share Image
Share on Facebook Tweet Email a friend
Embed Image
Post comment Comments
bontanel Apr 19 2014 says:


+9 votes     reply to comment
Velancious Creator
Velancious Apr 19 2014 replied:

That's the excuse it all comes down to, unfortunately. It also ends up being their last-ditch move.

+5 votes   reply to comment
WeeGee9000 Apr 20 2014 says:

Do you seriously think that we oppose global warming because it snowed last year?

Please, go back to your ecofascist hole. Either that or go read some articles or watch some documentaries that help you understand our point of view about climate change, like this one:


There are a LOT of things NOT being said to people about climate change, and it is a HUGE dilemma in science.

-2 votes     reply to comment
Sarge_Rho Apr 23 2014 replied:

There is a huge dilemma in science? Oh really? 97% of climate scientists agree that man is contributing to it.

+5 votes     reply to comment
WeeGee9000 Apr 24 2014 replied:

if 3% of those scientists are being bashed over it, then its not science, there is no science when there is an "absolute truth" being told to people, and most aren't even questioning it. That is called "religion".

I am sure you would understand more if you

PS: that "97%", where did you get that? If so many people oppose it, then how are they only 3%? Well, unfortunately most of those who oppose it are religious crazies and the ones trying to find REAL proof of the opposition of global warming don't want to be heard either.

-4 votes     reply to comment
Spudman619 Apr 25 2014 replied:


This provides basic, average and high levels of overview on the state of scientific consensus regarding global warming.

Also, the 3% are usually not bashed, just looked at with disbelief and then presented with evidence. Also, this 'bashed on' and 'absolute truth' thing. Science does this thing called weighing up the evidence. In this case the evidence points to human contribution of global warming.
If you fly in the face of all the evidence and sing 'la la la' with your fingers in your ears and your eyes closed, as the 3% generally do, then expect to be ridiculed to an extent.

+2 votes     reply to comment
WeeGee9000 Apr 25 2014 replied:

i am not pointing my fingers to the evidence and saying "la la la", i just found the 3% to be more believable, they are finding flaws in global warming and looking for the evidence, in fact, we had more CO2 in our atmosphere during the ice age than we have today

0 votes     reply to comment
Spudman619 Apr 27 2014 replied:

I wasn't saying you were, I was explaining that those you claim are being 'bashed' are usually bashed because they do that. I apologise for not being clear, it wouldn't let me edit my post.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Spudman619 Apr 24 2014 replied:

I don't get why people don't accept it. I understand people arguing over the rate of it occurring but the principle is simple really; humans burn stuff. Burning stuff releases CO2. Sun rays enter through the atmosphere to the Earth's surface which warms the Earth. Normally most heat would be radiated away from the Earth. CO2 blocks some of this. Extra CO2 means more heat blocked and re-radiated to Earth. Thus the Earth heats up more. Of course, other gases also contribute such as; methane, nitrous oxide and CFCs.

+2 votes     reply to comment
Post a Comment
click to sign in

You are not logged in, your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) which we encourage all contributors to do.

2000 characters limit; HTML formatting and smileys are not supported - text only

Image Details
Apr 19th, 2014
Embed Thumb
Report Abuse
Report media
Add Media
Members only