A group for those without religion, as well as those who oppose it. Atheism and Agnosticism and Anti-theism.

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
Bible
embed
share
view previous next
Share Image
Share on Facebook Tweet Email a friend
Embed Image
Comments
Sanguinius Creator
Sanguinius

Valid point :P

Reply Good karma+6 votes
RighteousFighter
RighteousFighter

Next thing you know is that the creatonists start claiming that earth is flat.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
xxT65xx Creator
xxT65xx

Unfortunately, they exist. Look up flat-earther, and you'll probably find some, though they're not nearly as popular as they used to be.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
TheTriangulum
TheTriangulum

hmmmm

I don't think you understand where the idea of the Earth being flat comes from
Neither does this dismiss the idea that they knew of the creation. That is generalization. And also you are presuming because the largest body believed this, everyone had to. That is logically flawed.
The Earth being flat was a theory proposed by Ptolemy that was adapted by the catholic church. Not by the early Isrealites of those times in Genesis.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
xxT65xx Creator
xxT65xx

The belief that all ancient societies believed the earth was flat is itself a myth. Still, the bible refers to the earth as having "four-corners" and the sky as a "firmament", which certainly seems to imply the earth was believed to be flat and the sky a solid object. In many of such verses there is no indication they are not to be taken literally (some yes), in genesis for instance it basically says "God created the earth" in one verse and in the next says "he created a great firmament" (thats definitely not exactly what it says). I see no reason to not take that literally, and the author seems to be meaning for it to be taken literally. You can shoe-horn many parts of the bible to fit with your beliefs, but you will still run into problems.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
TheTriangulum
TheTriangulum

sure. And the beasts of revelation are literal too. Ooooh lets throw out contextualisation in the incinerator and read it like a children's book. Lets burn the external research made by scholars who have studied the text and read the actual hebrew because xxT65xx says that archaic english is identical to the orginal language it was written in.
give me a freaking break.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
xxT65xx Creator
xxT65xx

I'm not saying that, not about Revelation. You see, contextually it does not make sense to presume in many cases that the author intended a specific verse to be taken allegorically. I'm not talking about poetry or prophecy, although even then it's sketchy. I was thinking mostly of Genesis where (like I said) in one verse it says "God created earth" and the next says "God created a great fermament" (the sky). Some of the more recent translations seem to kind of paraphrase verses like that to mean exactly what the guy translating it thought it meant, rather than accurately giving a hebrew-english translation. Although you can take the verse to mean whatever you want, that doesn't seem to be what the author intended the verse to mean in the original language.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
Cervi_Messias Creator
Cervi_Messias

wait... are you trying to tell me the earth isnt flat?

Reply Good karma+4 votes
Yuribeard7
Yuribeard7

False. The Bible does not say the earth is flat nor did God's followers believe it to be so. Even in the original Hebrew it says the earth is a circle (or sphere).

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Post a comment
Sign in or join with:

Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.

Details
Date
Size
650×305
Options
URL
Embed
Embed Thumb
Share
Feed
RSS
Report
Report