Dear Esther Windows game

*Woosh*

There is no point in arguing. Not liking it is not liking it, and not getting it is not getting it, and neither invalidates it except to you.

the story is (as far as i could tell) weak too! thats coming from someone who enjoys foreign films like orpheus and likes to read biographies!

its just filth hoping to hit the art niche (and real good art can only exist 100+ years after creation, jackson pollock for example was a mental case not an artist). its weak as a story, the graphics may look "ok" to some people but on a high end system that plays most games in 3d i assure you it looks no better than the majority of mainstream games (certainly no better than hard reset) particularly because there is so little going on, and the "gameplay" is non existent, how can it indeed be "good" if it fails on every level in its chosen medium?

trying to debase me for calling a turd a turd is the wrong approach, the correct one would be to simply say that you LIKE turds.

I can't think of any way to say this without sounding condescending:

Many respected critics, whose opinions have been consistently validated throughout their careers, agree that this is an excellent, even incredible game. One angry neckbeard attempts to use logic to argue that his opinion is, in fact, fact, and all those critics, and all those people who enjoyed it are morons for doing so.

You're living in a fantasy land, man. You will never convince those who enjoy the title that it is bad, unless they are exactly the impressionable suck-ups you denigrate. I am not debasing you; you are debasing yourself.

You want to use logic as a basis for argument, yet your entire argument is based on a ridiculous logical fallacy: that your opinion is right, and that everybody who disagrees with you is inherently wrong, for that simple fact.

And rest assured, in an argument as to the value of any medium, particularly a story or graphical work, there exist only facts in relation to punctuation, sentence structure; graininess, choppiness....not "good" or "bad." Those two qualities are based solely on an individual's enjoyment of it.

Also, the statement that good art can only exist one hundred plus years after creation is absurd.

Stop arguing about it. You are accomplishing nothing.

respecting career critics is your first mistake. they are there to sell games. this isnt even a game. as a gamer, this sucks. the "fact" that so few games are made for gamers anymore does **** me off, they would rather make some trash like this or a new hidden object game every day that retards and housewives can "win" at and say "oh that was a good game!" should make all gamers angry. crap apparently sells. atleast myst had puzzles (much as i hated that game)! this is nothing but boring. as a time wasting app this may very well be a roaring success but as a GAME it is crap.

real art withstands the test of time, i dont see how anything under 100 years old can be called art. also im not the one necroing the conversation 2 days later.

My part in this argument is done.