Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 picks up where Modern Warfare 2 left off with the invasion of Manhattan by Russian forces. You will blaze through 20 action-packed missions located in England, Russia, America, Germany, and France, playing as a Russian Federal Protective Services agent, an SAS Operative and a tank gunner. The Spec-Ops missions from MW2 will make a return, split into "Mission" and "Survival" modes. Also, Call of Duty: MW3 will have the amazing CoD-style multiplayer that you have come to known.
started with the SP campaign it was as expected an action firework serving top presentation and gameplay a thrilling 5 hours without much sense and realism together with foreseeable events. MW3 takes you to many different places and situations, airplane being hijacked and crashed, assaulting a submarine, african villages etc. yet sadly those moments don't last long and you wish to play there more. being without gravity inside the plane shooting ppl made fun but lasts only an half minute at best for example. the AI seemed decent, not really clever but enough to keep you entertained and challenged. i dunno who would run directly into me wielding a minigun and why R.soldiers still use old ak47 but i had a blast playing the campaign
much to my liking there is the SPEC OPS again and a new SURVIVAL. both can be played coop and expands the SP greatly. SURV. is good for getting the maps to know and frankly its fun playing on those 16 maps over and over again with different equipment. SPEC OPS is a dozen of missions which i found quite well made and they have replay value. sadly NO ZOMBIE mode
MP uses same cod formula and can be seen as success. various game modes and maps and equipment keep it from getting old. huge downside for me is the unlocking system. you level up every weapon making it a pain to go from your accessible gun over to the newly unlocked one without any atachments, abilities etc. leaving you with disadvantage to others. maps aren't that various they all play same way also kinda small and so is the max of 12 players. why no MP in airplane/underground facility with tunnels/sandstorm/night/open fields etc?
Visually its very poor very low demanding, dull mostly grey environments. same with the effects. reason could be disk space and xbox but that ain't an excuse. my impression it uses dx9. my g.card is very quiet while running mw3. 5yr ago this has been great looking.
was fun i dont regret getting but not fps king. beware of aimboters. character limit sry.
The gaming community has never had a shortage of First Person Shooter games. Almost like clockwork, every year a new FPS comes out that breaks sales records and dominates the market and receives critical acclaim. Doom, Quake, Halflife, Halo, Medal of Honor and on and on, the FPS marches forward to dominate sales and past glories set. So what was it about Modern Warfare that, despite being a basic clone of games before it, has continued to grow?
The renewable fanbase is something that I think few critics of the series have not considered. For fans that have been around since the 2007 release, the game has either not lived up to expectations or grown stale due to its repeat game model.
The critics fail to realize that every year new players who have never played a MW game are experiencing the game for the first time. To them, and me, MW is a brand new experience. I've played Battlefield 3, and the game is not for me. Where BF3 is a huge game that you can walk around for five or ten minutes without seeing anyone, in MW3 you can't run around five or ten seconds without running into someone.
Many critics have cited that not only is the game ”more of the same” but that the maps are also bland and uninspired. When I first started the game, I recognized the MP maps as following two models- maze and linear. Maze maps are basically hallways, clutter and obstacles that litter a map and force players into close combat. This model is usually tough to learn and benefits players with fast reaction times that favor close quarters weapons such as shotguns and sub-machine guns. The linear maps are typically wide open maps with little to no Z-axis play and a central focus. These maps are prone to snipers and medium range weapons such as assault rifles. An experienced FPS player will quickly identify these maps and adapt their game-play for each map rather than forcing the same style of play for every map.
For me, this is a fresh experience which I give an 8.
Getting quite annoyed at the "MW3 SUCKS PLAY BATTLEFIELD" comments. To compare MW3 and Battlefield would be like comparing apples and oranges. MW3 is more based towards faster game play, which one might argue Battlefield is more strategic. In any account, I found MW3 to be very enjoyable. Though I never was a fan of the rather simple plot line, the graphics were very nice and the maps were well executed, as I would expect from one of the largest entertainment companies in the world. What I enjoy most about the Modern Warfare series is seeing the technological progress between each game. And lets face it, you guys who all hate it still buy the new one every time it comes out. ...And subsequently complain about how horrible it is.
Awesome game! new campign and new Guns. 3th Modern Warfare Call of Duty that has bring the game to the top. i've got my favorite chracters back: Captain John Price, Captain Soap Mactavis and Nikolai. you fight at Paris, London, New York, Somalia, Planes and somewhere in Germany. you back to fight against Makarov! You play As 2 characters: Ameircan Delta Force unit Frost and in Taks Force 141 as Yuri. Yuri is an ex-Spetznaz fighting with Price, Soap and Nikolai. Gameplay is just old-school CoD! and Black Ops don't deserve the name Call of Duty! i recomend this game if you came out of school or work and thinking: I gonna Shoot evryone in Old-school FPS style! i recomend this to because it's not only killing, killing, killing without story. it has a huge story line and that's why there are 4 MW titles. So why you waiting?
This game is good.The graphics are only slightly better than MW2 but the storyline and gameplay are awsome.Unlike BF3 which is a game with AMAZING graphics but really bad story and characters which pale in comparison to Soap and Price.I've played both (only SP) and I can say that MW3>BF3.But I know that BF3 fanboys will not agree