Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 picks up where Modern Warfare 2 left off with the invasion of Manhattan by Russian forces. You will blaze through 20 action-packed missions located in England, Russia, America, Germany, and France, playing as a Russian Federal Protective Services agent, an SAS Operative and a tank gunner. The Spec-Ops missions from MW2 will make a return, split into "Mission" and "Survival" modes. Also, Call of Duty: MW3 will have the amazing CoD-style multiplayer that you have come to known.

Review RSS Feed halo44327 says
7 halo44327

May 7th, 2013 0 people agree 1 person doesn't

Ok. Due to many people not giving a fair given review of it is sad. Its not the "shittest" or "crappiest" game ever existing. There are lots more worse than this.
Don't compare this to BF3 because they are two entire different games. If they were close, then wouldn't it be pointless to have one or the other? First off, the campaign is what a CoD campaign. Very intense and worth a play. Second. The co-op and survival mode gives a lot of replay and you can play offline with a good friend. There is nothing wrong with the multiplayer its just there is nothing new or different. I've played CoD 1 and ever since it was the same gameplay. However BF has had the same gameplay too. Classes, etc. The flamers of these reviews are pathetic. Not because of their opinion, but because of their opinions are nothing but "i hate this game period." No reasoning at all. The guns are unbalance but that is sometimes a good thing. Its like real life. I thought people wanted more of a "realistic" type of game. Pistols will do less than their rifle counterpart. But in the end its possibly fatal. I think this game is decent. It runs. It plays like a typical CoD game. However it does lack in new changes or additions. They replace the zombies with survival. its cool. Makes me want to play it again. However, even though I'm not a competitive person and don't play multiplayer anyhow, I do tend to believe that the maps were small, and not much leg room. Now THIS is a review. Not this "BF3 is better" crap. I played BF 1942 and BF 2 more and I think as a BF fan, that BF3 has a crappy campaign and there are not bots. So it sucks. You like that now? Probably not.

BromUndbintr says
9 BromUndbintr

Apr 15th, 2013 0 people agree 1 person doesn't

awsome game, dying to finish it

TiToOmg says
10 TiToOmg

Mar 16th, 2013 0 people agree 2 people don't

ME encanta el juego y ahora tengo un torneo del mismo

AudioGhostX says
1 AudioGhostX

Feb 24th, 2013 0 people agree 0 people don't

Terrible game.

BagaturKhan says
8 BagaturKhan

Dec 17th, 2012 0 people agree 2 people don't

I don`t like kill russians in this game (because this is MY people)! But game is cool ;)

poshgaloo says
6 poshgaloo

Jul 3rd, 2012 0 people agree 2 people don't

Well it is pretty much the same as MW2 (favorite COD game). Accept this time it looks like it was meant to be over the top and have possibly the WORST spec ops modes iv'e ever seen! The only two lifesavers for this game are: survival mode; and another bad *** ending!

SourHyperion1 says
8 SourHyperion1

Jun 26th, 2012 0 people agree 2 people don't

Call of Duty returns with the Final Chapter in the Modern Warfare series, and third time's the charm... right?

Single-player: Right from the beginning you are dropped into the action. This campaign keeps you on your toes and hooked in. I will admit, Soap's death was a little anticlimactic. I mean, he's survived showers of bullets, grenades, etc. but he is finally killed by a 2x4. The storyline, either way, is brilliant and I enjoyed it. I give it a 9/10.
Multi-player: The classic style is back with some improvements from its prequel. New weapons and the return of the G36C give you a new collection of weapons to choose from. The stupid 3rd person game mode was removed, but a much better gamemode, Kill Confirmed, replaced it. The maps are a lot more balanced and fun to play as well. I give it an 8/10.
Spec-ops: Back again is Spec ops, but with the new Survival Mode, which in essence is Nazi Zombies with humans. The missions are new and fresh and are fairly entertaining to try out after you've beaten the campaign. I give it an 8/10.
Gameplay: Gameplay is almost exactly the same as MW2's with some improvements. As for multi-player, be ready for Juggernauts and campers. Once you get comfortable, though, it is easy and fun. I give it a 8/10.
Graphics: This is what everyone complains about, graphics. That ridiculous shiny shader is back, but PC Gamers can disable it. There are improvements and it is a newer engine, but deep down in its mechanical heart, it is MW2. I give it a 7/10.

Summary:
Battlefield 3 vs. Modern Warfare 3, Who will win? Neither. The two don't belong on the same field because they are two completely different experiences. If you are looking for a fast paced shooter that doesn't need classes and has more ways to play, Go for Modern Warfare 3. If you want to go for impressive graphics, realism, and tactical I recommend trying Battlefield. Either way, play both. Both are equally brilliant. I give MW3 an 8/10.

Kaonis says
6 Kaonis

May 18th, 2012 0 people agree 1 person doesn't

It looks a bit recicled ...

command&halo says
7 command&halo

Feb 21st, 2012 0 people agree 1 person doesn't

nice game but not much better than MW2

Kotov9 says
3 Kotov9

Dec 31st, 2011 1 person agrees 1 person doesn't

After reading the others review I think I'm not going to buy MW3. That's all... Peace off

But I like the singelplayer.... That's all

Community Rating

Average

5.2

140 votes submitted.

You Say

-

Ratings closed.