Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 picks up where Modern Warfare 2 left off with the invasion of Manhattan by Russian forces. You will blaze through 20 action-packed missions located in England, Russia, America, Germany, and France, playing as a Russian Federal Protective Services agent, an SAS Operative and a tank gunner. The Spec-Ops missions from MW2 will make a return, split into "Mission" and "Survival" modes. Also, Call of Duty: MW3 will have the amazing CoD-style multiplayer that you have come to known.

Review RSS Feed ytres says
1 ytres

Mar 17th, 2013 1 person agrees 0 people don't

nah

merhabi says
1 merhabi

Feb 11th, 2013 1 person agrees 0 people don't

A First Person shooter with Nukes... thats all i have to say...

Spy08 says
1 Spy08

Feb 26th, 2012 1 person agrees 0 people don't

Its not fun to play

Suokukko says
1 Suokukko

Dec 27th, 2013 0 people agree 0 people don't

It suckz.

Poe_Mk._II says
10 Poe_Mk._II

Dec 9th, 2013 0 people agree 0 people don't

America, **** yea!

greg5610 says
1 greg5610

Nov 10th, 2013 0 people agree 0 people don't

simple

Silent_Hunter says
1 Silent_Hunter

Aug 27th, 2013 0 people agree 0 people don't

Call of Duty is the same game over and over... NO NEWS THERE!

ShadowLoner says
10 ShadowLoner

Jun 12th, 2013 0 people agree 5 people don't

by far the best of the call of duty games yet amazing

halo44327 says
7 halo44327

May 7th, 2013 0 people agree 1 person doesn't

Ok. Due to many people not giving a fair given review of it is sad. Its not the "shittest" or "crappiest" game ever existing. There are lots more worse than this.
Don't compare this to BF3 because they are two entire different games. If they were close, then wouldn't it be pointless to have one or the other? First off, the campaign is what a CoD campaign. Very intense and worth a play. Second. The co-op and survival mode gives a lot of replay and you can play offline with a good friend. There is nothing wrong with the multiplayer its just there is nothing new or different. I've played CoD 1 and ever since it was the same gameplay. However BF has had the same gameplay too. Classes, etc. The flamers of these reviews are pathetic. Not because of their opinion, but because of their opinions are nothing but "i hate this game period." No reasoning at all. The guns are unbalance but that is sometimes a good thing. Its like real life. I thought people wanted more of a "realistic" type of game. Pistols will do less than their rifle counterpart. But in the end its possibly fatal. I think this game is decent. It runs. It plays like a typical CoD game. However it does lack in new changes or additions. They replace the zombies with survival. its cool. Makes me want to play it again. However, even though I'm not a competitive person and don't play multiplayer anyhow, I do tend to believe that the maps were small, and not much leg room. Now THIS is a review. Not this "BF3 is better" crap. I played BF 1942 and BF 2 more and I think as a BF fan, that BF3 has a crappy campaign and there are not bots. So it sucks. You like that now? Probably not.

BromUndbintr says
9 BromUndbintr

Apr 15th, 2013 0 people agree 1 person doesn't

awsome game, dying to finish it

Community Rating

Average

5.2

139 votes submitted.

You Say

-

Ratings closed.