Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 picks up where Modern Warfare 2 left off with the invasion of Manhattan by Russian forces. You will blaze through 20 action-packed missions located in England, Russia, America, Germany, and France, playing as a Russian Federal Protective Services agent, an SAS Operative and a tank gunner. The Spec-Ops missions from MW2 will make a return, split into "Mission" and "Survival" modes. Also, Call of Duty: MW3 will have the amazing CoD-style multiplayer that you have come to known.

Report article RSS Feed Modern Warfare 3 to have Dedicated Servers

Good news everyone, Modern Warfare 3 will have dedicated server support for PC players!

Posted by Henley on Aug 17th, 2011

Back in 2009 a little game called Modern Warfare 2 disappointed pc gamers by removing everything that makes the PC version of the game superior to any of its console brethren. I am talking about dedicated servers. The act disabled any sort of real modding to the game along with the ability to make custom maps, build communities and not be forced into waiting for the develoepr to patch the multiplayer with extra content.

Good news everyone, Modern Warfare 3 will have dedicated server support for PC players! This was revealed today at Gamescom by the associate manager for Call of Duty Digital, Jay Frechette, and reaffirmed by Sledgehammer boss Glen Schofield on Twitter.


It is good to see developers learning from their mistakes, the mapping community will not be silent if you cross them! *fist pumps and so on*

Source: 1up.com

Post comment Comments  (0 - 50 of 129)
Lt.Dann
Lt.Dann Aug 17 2011, 10:57pm says:

Wow, probably the first good thing I heard about MW3.

+87 votes     reply to comment
macacos2
macacos2 Aug 17 2011, 11:08pm replied:

Now it's totally worth those extra $60, right?

+28 votes     reply to comment
7game
7game Aug 17 2011, 11:33pm replied:

No.

+108 votes     reply to comment
LordIheanacho
LordIheanacho Aug 18 2011, 12:38am replied:

With all the disappointing games Activision have already created, Modern Warfare 3 ought to be sold for $10.

+68 votes     reply to comment
TheUnabridgedGamer
TheUnabridgedGamer Aug 18 2011, 12:40am replied:

The last game from them that I think I enjoyed years after owning it...

Was the original Spider-Man movie game (rather good, and I think Treyarch actually was building).

+16 votes     reply to comment
ZaliaS
ZaliaS Aug 18 2011, 5:05am replied:

****, I wouldn't even waste the bandwidth to pirate this crap for the single player campaign.

And that's pretty low.
'cause pirating is free...

+40 votes     reply to comment
Spr09
Spr09 Aug 18 2011, 9:25am replied:

i wouldnt waste the bandwidth to watch the videos of it!

+18 votes     reply to comment
Tibyon
Tibyon Aug 18 2011, 8:25am replied:

Yeah, the original Spider-Man was really good, but developed by Treyarch.

+7 votes     reply to comment
MasterArngeir
MasterArngeir Aug 20 2011, 5:21am replied:

you mean infiaty ward and they the best i still play cod 1 myself and treyarch is crap even tho i have cod 1,2,3,4,6 and 7

-1 votes     reply to comment
kjfytfkytfyt
kjfytfkytfyt Aug 23 2011, 1:49am replied:

you do know, everything after call of duty 4, isnt really 5,6,7, and soon 8, after modern warfare 3, they could make a game called Call of Duty 5, kind of like how grand theft auto had a few games after 3, and then they made gta 4...

+2 votes     reply to comment
tenyuhuang
tenyuhuang Sep 13 2011, 2:10am replied:

You ARE kidding me. What's the point buying an HD version of Quake 3 TDM and VitruaCops bundled together for 10 USD?

+1 vote     reply to comment
EclipseStardestroyer
EclipseStardestroyer Feb 22 2012, 10:13am replied:

That's how much DLC should cost, but no! They have to be something like $15-$20! That doesn't even make sense for just 5 maps! It's like 25% of the price for the actual game which has everything in it, and just 5 maps cost THAT much! It's ridiculous!

+1 vote     reply to comment
Dr.Worm
Dr.Worm Aug 20 2011, 2:25am replied:

nope.

+1 vote     reply to comment
MartyForEels
MartyForEels Aug 25 2011, 5:43am buried:

(buried)

If i have to spend 60 bucks, i would do it on MW3. BF3 is pretty much the same arcade **** like BF3 except it isnt by EA and it isnt on Origin.

End Of Discussion.

-6 votes     reply to comment
kjfytfkytfyt
kjfytfkytfyt Sep 10 2011, 7:07pm replied:

dude, that made no sense at all....

+3 votes     reply to comment
[TZP]LoNer1
[TZP]LoNer1 Sep 26 2011, 3:59pm replied:

Yeah, not AT ALL, BF3 is making a NEW ENGINE, and COD is just making SOME MAPS ON A 4 or maybe 5 YEAR OLD ENGINE!!! DOH

+2 votes     reply to comment
Ileftu4dead
Ileftu4dead Aug 18 2011, 12:38am buried:

(buried)

yea i'll consider getting it after the PC gets decent support(im talking getting DLCs at a decent price at a decent time)

-5 votes     reply to comment
Chompster
Chompster Aug 18 2011, 3:25pm replied:

CoD DLC at a decent price? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....ohh...ah ha... thats a good one..

+38 votes     reply to comment
Anterly
Anterly Aug 25 2011, 9:28am replied:

Oh Chompster, you just made my day

+2 votes     reply to comment
altercuca
altercuca Aug 19 2011, 2:53pm replied:

keep dreaming

+8 votes     reply to comment
TheUnabridgedGamer
TheUnabridgedGamer Aug 17 2011, 11:04pm says:

Glad they realized this was a logical thing to add. Now if only they allowed for modding and dedicated servers for Bioshock 2... oh, the possibilities...

+5 votes     reply to comment
JohnnyMaverik
JohnnyMaverik Aug 17 2011, 11:11pm says:

What about Mod support? Also a good single player campaign. Also not being bugged to crap for months on the pc rendering it practically unplayable despite dedicated server support alla Black Ops.

Colour me Cynical -_-

+14 votes     reply to comment
Ark_
Ark_ Aug 17 2011, 11:39pm says:

Ok so let me see this week so far we have had:
Dice: BF3 64 player gameplay with jets.
Crytek: Releasing the CryEngine 3 toolkit.
IW: Um, we have reanbled dedi servers.
:/ Excuse me but im a bit underwhelmed.

+52 votes     reply to comment
LordIheanacho
LordIheanacho Aug 18 2011, 12:40am replied:

what is IW?

0 votes     reply to comment
LordIheanacho
LordIheanacho Aug 18 2011, 12:47am replied:

nvm, Infinity Ward.

+6 votes     reply to comment
ZaliaS
ZaliaS Aug 18 2011, 5:14am replied:

Except Infinity Ward doesn't exist anymore... Its now called Respawn. Infinity Ward are the only ones who would actually make a GOOD CoD game. Take a look at the original and its expansion for example. Oh, and CoD 2. Then there was the LAST good thing to ever come from the name "Call of Duty" was the first Modern Warfare.

After that, its been Treyarch remaking the same damn ****, re-skinned, re-textured, re-mapped, and ******* re-cycled over; and over, and over, and over, and over... Then all sold at a full retail price.

But thanks for the effort Treyarch. Thanks for the attempt Activision. But I think I'm quite content with sticking to a game development company whom has NEVER disappointed me in the past, wouldn't ever in the future, and would stay true to the creed "Create games for the passion of creating quality and fun for gamers" and not "Create the same game 20 times to see how many loyal idiots we can keep making money off of."

A loyal DICE fan,
-ZaliaS

+19 votes     reply to comment
AaronLewis
AaronLewis Aug 18 2011, 6:27am replied:

Yeah but BF3 requires origin to play it on PC. I don't want to install that piece of crap to play my game.

At least they are trying to be more friendly to us PC gamers.

Loyal DICE fan here too.

+8 votes     reply to comment
Kastrenzo
Kastrenzo Aug 18 2011, 12:47pm replied:

MW3 May have dedicated servers, but it's still a console port. Consoles are the leading platform it's being developed for.

BF3 In contrast is being developed as a PC Game, and they will dumb down the console versions to be compatible with the limited hardware, example being the 24 player limit and small maps.

Personally I think BF3 Multiplayer is going to be a drag on console.

+13 votes     reply to comment
ZaliaS
ZaliaS Aug 18 2011, 8:15pm buried:

(buried)

If you by the Steam version of BF3, no Origin installation needed there ;). Only thing needed from Origin for the Steam version is the ingame login.

-5 votes     reply to comment
Kastrenzo
Kastrenzo Aug 19 2011, 4:44pm replied:

far as I know Battelfield 3 won't be on steam, nor will Mass effect 3, or any future EA Release.

EA Got a stick up their *** about not being allowed to market Portal 2, and hence they split from Valve and now run their buggy steam clone, Origin.

Considering cancelling my BF3 hardcopy preorder, EB Games/Gamestop charged me about $10 more than what EA Prices it at, and that was just the regular edition.

+5 votes     reply to comment
claytonian
claytonian Aug 20 2011, 5:04am replied:

Did you forget about MW2? IW made that. That's not a good game.

0 votes     reply to comment
kjfytfkytfyt
kjfytfkytfyt Aug 23 2011, 1:59am replied:

Yes it does, Respawn Entertainment is made up of tons of people that were in infinity ward, but infinity ward still exists.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Shoelip
Shoelip Aug 18 2011, 1:02am replied:

Hey don't forget about Red Orchestra 2: Awesome grandpa trailer! Also all the other stuff that's been revealed about it through gameplay videos on youtube.

Hell, if Modthreern Warfarthree Thrthreethree is as good as the last gamthree it'll at lthreeast bthree worth playing if you gthreet it for frthreethree as a gift.

+8 votes     reply to comment
AaronLewis
AaronLewis Aug 18 2011, 6:29am replied:

I preordered RO2 before I have preordered any other games this year. Its going to kick *** like the original

+6 votes     reply to comment
Derpmeifter
Derpmeifter Aug 18 2011, 9:29am replied:

Ugh, I hate this comment. BF3 will not require origin to be installed TO PLAY, just to get the game. It'll be on the same update scheme as BC2, and the copy of BC2 I have installed on my system came from origin. Guess what? I have uninstalled origin. That's right, totally gone, and I can still play online and all that fun stuff. Stop pulling this out as a reason NOT to buy BF3.

+13 votes     reply to comment
ZaliaS
ZaliaS Aug 18 2011, 8:18pm replied:

Honestly, I don't really see any issue with Origin. Its just Electronic Art's way of creating a STEAM clone for themselves. It's worked out amazingly for Valve. EA just wants to try a shot at it. But like Derpmeifter said; Got an issue with it? Then just uninstall it.

+3 votes     reply to comment
Lt.Dann
Lt.Dann Aug 18 2011, 2:40am replied:

Yet they'll still have higher sales for using most of their money for advertising instead of using it on their games.

+6 votes     reply to comment
altercuca
altercuca Aug 19 2011, 2:58pm replied:

lol activision is the Apple of games software :P! take something out, then put it back in when demand rises, giving a fake incentive to customers so they buy their games. Its getting ridiculous and gamers need to stay away from it.

+4 votes     reply to comment
Hell_Diguner
Hell_Diguner Aug 18 2011, 1:05am says:

Dedicated Servers: About go-dam time! All multiplayer emphasized games should have dedicated servers with a browse function, even on consoles.

Still won't be buying it though. The CoD games never appealed to me. Too much emphasis on 'twitch' based gunplay, you don't need any other skills to do well in the game. :-/

+5 votes     reply to comment
SabreXT
SabreXT Aug 18 2011, 1:49am buried:

(buried)

I disagree in that twitch is just as important as any other game. To me, there is more tactics in cod than counter strike which is just "aim for the head".

I really like headquarters mode and that mode where you have to plan the bomb with respawns is ok. TDM wasn't for me though.

-9 votes     reply to comment
macacos2
macacos2 Aug 18 2011, 2:07pm replied:

Counter Strike has, as incredible as it seems, a lot more tactical based gameplay than CoD.

In Counter-strike you get many different maps with different approaches for each team, where the loadout actually matters, specially when talking about grenades. Walking slowly and silently works wonders when behind enemy lines, and sure, running and gunning also work in that game if everyone is doing so. But if a team is coordinated enough (or skilled enough) they're able to make the game interesting. Since you only have one life per round, some people try and make the best of it by not wasting it. The fact that you get rewarded with money for better weapons every round keeps the game playable for veteran and new gamers alike.

In Call of Duty Modern Warfare series, however, all you have is running and gunning. The ridiculously low penalty for dying and simplistic aiming system makes it, technically, a casual game. When killed you pretty much instantly respawn, so all you need to do is run, hold the ironsight button pressed and spray everywhere. It's a fast passed simplistic shooter and that's why most people like it, no one plays it for being tactical. In the CoD MW series there's also a levelling system, which gives you better equipment as you play the game, giving you an advantage over new players.

Of course, they had to add something to differ the "rookies" from the "veterans", and since the gameplay is not based on skill, the only way to do it was through the levelling system.

+8 votes     reply to comment
SubZerp
SubZerp Aug 18 2011, 3:20pm replied:

yeah to bad 75% of servers de_dust2 eh

+3 votes     reply to comment
Gradius
Gradius Aug 18 2011, 7:41pm replied:

Don't be ridiculous. I'm sure it's a larger percentage than that.

+3 votes     reply to comment
SabreXT
SabreXT Aug 18 2011, 4:41pm replied:

That argument doesn't work because you are compairing a new MW player to an experienced CS one. You can do that with any 2 competitive games to make one sound bad.

You could easy say- "CS is all just the pistol round, lose that and it's almost impossible to gain the upper hand again. Plus skilled player have the upper hand simply by knowing the map, the best weapons to buy and where to camp."

and then say about MW- "the game rewards getting skilled with specific weapons. Spray and prey only works for the early game, a skilled team will steamroll you. Someone who dies alot isn't going to get the killstreaks to help the team win." ect.

A better example is look at TF2 fanboys. They will swear blind that the game is 100% perfectly balenced and then when they lose a game they will shout at you for not picking/having the 'right' weapons. So, to make TF2 look bad, simply bring up the weapons being horribly inbalenced and victory being determed by crits rather than teamwork. If you want to make TF2 look good, just say the opposate, it's perfectly balenced, and good teamwork beats lucky crits every time.

The truth is likely in the middle. Both CS and MW are a balence between twitch and tatics. To say CS is all tactics and MW is all twitch is disingenuous imo.

+2 votes     reply to comment
Sev-RC-
Sev-RC- Aug 18 2011, 5:39pm buried:

(buried)

For me MW isn't that balanced but cs/css is but tf2 is just crap.(balance wise)

-8 votes     reply to comment
ESFER25
ESFER25 Aug 19 2011, 4:16pm replied:

Don't be ridiculous, who cares if you have overpowered weapons (only demoman's melee weps are OP in my opinion)? In TF2 the skilled players win, I know it, i've been playing it for over 200 hours (months before it became f2p) and i never get tired of it, default weapons are just as good as unlockables if you know how to use them. In the other hand, i bought mw2 some days ago, i'm level 27, I'm soooo bored now, it's easy to know how this works: noobtubers everywhere, campers in every damn corner, the first team who gets an AC130 wins, it's as easy as that...

+4 votes     reply to comment
altercuca
altercuca Aug 19 2011, 3:13pm replied:

you just made my day!

+2 votes     reply to comment
Spr09
Spr09 Aug 18 2011, 9:27am replied:

they arent gonna matter, looks at the players column on the photo.

that's how many people are going to actually play this terrible game.

+3 votes     reply to comment
SabreXT
SabreXT Aug 18 2011, 1:46am says:

I like dedicated servers, but I think people were to harsh on peer to peer.

The things I will miss from the peer to peer system is that you always get a full game, not a bunch of empty servers or servers with only 2 guys, and if a team rage quit, another instantly filled the void. Not to mention no quake sounds, no 30 players crammed into a 4v4 map, no motd spams telling you not to be racist and visit the forum every 15 seconds, no needing maps that are exactly like the stock ones with a barrel moved 3 inches to right for 'balence'. Oh, and it was easy to play with friends.

However, given the problems with peer to peer such as lag and disconnects, I prefer dedicated servers.

+5 votes     reply to comment
Katana_
Katana_ Aug 18 2011, 8:23am replied:

Considering how most dedicated servers are in datacenters or are run by people with a decent pipe to the server, this is definitely a change back to normality. How many people were playing and hosting off of a DSL connection that probably couldn't handle a 2v2 game, much less 6v6?

Plus, the whole notion of having "host" is ridiculous, the advantage you gain is enormous.

Also, microwaves won't screw over EVERYONE playing now if the host is by one running, just the person near the microwave.
Xkcd.com

+3 votes     reply to comment
Post a Comment
click to sign in

You are not logged in, your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) which we encourage all contributors to do.

2000 characters limit; HTML formatting and smileys are not supported - text only

Icon
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3
Platforms
Windows, Wii, PS3, X360
Developer
Infinity Ward
Publisher
Activision
Engine
IW Engine
Contact
Send Message
Official Page
Pcgamer.com
Release Date
Released Nov 7, 2011
Game Watch
Track this game
News
Browse
News
Report Abuse
Report article
Related Games
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 Single & Multiplayer First Person Shooter
Related Engines
IW Engine
IW Engine Commercial Released Oct 22, 2005
Related Groups
Activision
Activision Developer & Publisher
Editor's Notes
Editor's Notes Official group with 202 members
Infinity Ward
Infinity Ward Developer & Publisher