atWar, formerly Afterwind, is a free-2-play online multiplayer turn-based strategy game (Silverlight). In the best traditions of Risk and Axis & Allies, you play against other people to fight for world domination. Features free unit movement - no grids or predetermined paths. Up to 20 players in a game, simultaneous turns. Another feature is the Map Editor allowing players to create their own maps and units, giving you the chance to re-enact any battle real or imagined. If you get disconnection problems with the Desura file right after you load the game then you should disable the firewall or add a firewall exception rule... or just go to our website and play in your browser there.

Image RSS Feed Latest Screens
atWar screen shot: Fallout USA Map atWar screen shot: Europe in 1334 atWar screen shot
Blog RSS Feed Report abuse Latest News: atWar now on Linux!

4 comments by abfahren on Aug 22nd, 2013


atWar can now be played on Linux!

Now everyone can enjoy atWar thanks to Pipelight, which allows Windows applications (including Silverlight). For more information you can go to Pipelight. This has been tested on arch Linux, you still have to use an user agent switcher, because otherwise the game does not load. Thanks to the atWar member Parakooper for finding this out.


Media RSS Feed Latest Video
Post comment Comments  (70 - 80 of 96)
skenderbeu1
skenderbeu1 Jan 17 2013, 4:19pm says:

You are wrong rookie, to buy packages is not necessary to have fun with th game ,90% of the time i played i AW i was not premiu, and i enjoyed it .
Ofc, how a lot of games there is the premium part that make it more funny, but it doesnt make the difference in game from white to black. People can enjoy AW anyways-

+1 vote     reply to comment
_Rouge_Xvil
_Rouge_Xvil Jan 17 2013, 4:29pm replied:

Why do u answer to a thing you don't understand man ?
He just talk about hosting, not about content, and i think he's right, it's just sad to see indie developpers doin' the same old crappy trap called free to play, and ask for money to play their game entirely.. It's reminds me of crusader kings 2, wich is just awesome, and ruined by the fact u have to buy almost 5 dlcs to have the entire game, i mean wtf... are we in indie land ? or in suck my d.. land ? U guys makes me wanna go play black ops 2...

+2 votes     reply to comment
RookieDagro
RookieDagro Jan 17 2013, 5:08pm replied:

Yea, mainstream games are under focus, which means they can't screw their consumers over with dodgy business methods that are in a somewhat grey area, whilst many people feel cheated, many are happy. Mainstream companies can only opt for the choice that makes everyone happy.

The host options package feels like someone gave me a sweet FPS game to test before anyone else, then put handcuffs on me and said "Have at it buddy, have fun."
How could I use the mouse and move with handcuffs on without sorely limiting my enjoyment?

+2 votes     reply to comment
_Rouge_Xvil
_Rouge_Xvil Jan 17 2013, 5:16pm replied:

Next step, in music, a song of 3 minutes having the drums and the bass for 1minutes and ten seconds, and boom, nothing but a rythmic emptyness, and on ur ocular implant, an ad, offering u the rest for 2.99 dollars :)

+1 vote     reply to comment
RookieDagro
RookieDagro Jan 18 2013, 6:54am replied:

Hah. That's marketing gone mad. I hope that we don't end up in a future where adverts are plastered all over our implanted field of view. That'd be annoying as heck and ruin the whole technology.

+2 votes     reply to comment
RookieDagro
RookieDagro Jan 17 2013, 3:14pm says:

Okay so, this was fantastic, and I thoroughly enjoyed myself for about an hour.
I got a friend to install the game after telling him how awesome it was playing on the game of thrones map, we decided we wanted to play together and then we went to host a game. Here's where you completely ruined your game - you have to PAY, with REAL MONEY, to host a game of this, being that with these types of strategy game finding players is hard enough, you've built a wall that stops players from creating games altogether! I was sorely disappointed, in the game, in the poor marketing decision.

Altogether the game is a definite 9/10 on gameplay, the customisable maps and unit types that people can add in to remake scenarios is brilliant, I love it, I love the game, I love the chat systems, I love the battles.
I just hate the fact you want people to buy a "game option package" to host a game. In my eyes this has completely destroyed my view of the overall product. Poor producers often destroy a product. Take a look at War Z and how sergei titov completely ruined a game that had potential by overhyping it and promising deadlines he couldn't keep. He even ended up writing an apology letter about it.

+1 vote     reply to comment
blargh69
blargh69 Jan 17 2013, 6:09pm replied:

You can always ask a premium player to open a specific game for you. I know that most people wouldn't mind doing that. Also you can buy specific packs separatly if you dont wish to buy full premium and they will last forever.

+3 votes     reply to comment
hdrakon
hdrakon Jan 17 2013, 4:32pm replied:

i agree about the good stuff you said about the game, in my opinion AW is like one of the best online strategy browser game i ever played, and i played alot of browser games believe me.
it look like you dislike the way its because the game creators need to get some revenue from this game after wasting non stop for this game to maintain it, then its not so good anymore?.
i think non payers still have a good deal, because they are able to play games for free and use their available sp to purchase upgrades and stuff..
non payers:
1.)they are allowed to play any kind of custom map.
2.)have almost all the basic game features apart from the desired ones that are kept to be used for premiums.
as long as you didnt paid cash and saw the difference from premium to non premium dont say such things about the game, and if you want a to play custom map as non payer member ask nicely from the players to make a map you want and i am sure they will be glad to help you in this tinny issue, or pay to have map/scenario pack, it cost few cents and it will help the game alot, just dont leave such wonderful game because of of tiny problems that you cause..

+3 votes     reply to comment
RookieDagro
RookieDagro Jan 17 2013, 5:01pm replied:

No, you didn't read my review. I mentioned that they had to come up with an alternative revenue source that didn't limit a player's experience and subsequently the enjoyment of the game.

+1 vote     reply to comment
abfahren Creator
abfahren Jan 17 2013, 3:48pm replied:

Disapointing you can't enjoy it. Although, free to play players can join ANY of the non private custom maps (Game of Thrones being one of these) which happen frequently per hour. This is not Pay to Play and ProtoBytes will do everything to avoid that. I think the prolonged (over 3 years now) strong free to play membership is evidence of such a thing.

+2 votes   reply to comment
RookieDagro
RookieDagro Jan 17 2013, 5:02pm replied:

I did enjoy it, to the extent that I was allowed to.
It's like someone giving you a bite of a cookie for free, then making you pay for the rest of THAT cookie. My alternative was to propose that they give you that whole cookie, then offer you another cookie if you enjoyed the first one. A somewhat dodgy metaphor but I think it works.

0 votes     reply to comment
RookieDagro
RookieDagro Jan 17 2013, 3:16pm replied:

Overall rating of the game is a 4/10, purely because you have to pay to play.
Gameplay (when you can find a game) - 9/10.
Music - 7/10
Sound effect(s) - 4/10
Chat system - 7/10 - easy to use, have to click the chat box to talk every time you finish troop movement, rather than pressing enter as with most games.
Graphics - 9/10 for this type of game, they are better than is to be expected from the genre of riskesque games.
Ease of game hosting and playing with friends - 1/10 - if you're lucky you can join a game with a friend before the 5 turn limit, but don't think about making any private games for you and your friends, that'll cost you money.
I believe you shouldn't have to pay to host. There should be something else, such as a general system, an avatar you can attach to units to give bonuses and you can buy items for the general to equip him with different abilities (nothing overpowered, just like +1 attack +2 defence, etc.)
There are alternative options such as an item transaction store, rather than forcing players to pay to enjoy the game to it's full extent.
I hope you take my -somewhat- review seriously and review an alternative method that makes the game free-to-play with a paid option, nothing like it is now - pay-to-play.

-1 votes     reply to comment
iom2010
iom2010 Jan 17 2013, 4:33pm replied:

I disagreed with you with that statement ‘purely because you have to pay to play.’
This, in my opinion, is free to play because there are a lots of games to join with your friends to play world maps, Europe maps, custom maps etc without having to pay.

atWar doesn’t force players to enjoy the game to its full extent. You will notice that there is a lot of non-premium* players at high ranks (takes a long time to rank up) and they still love playing atWar.

Sure you have to pay to host games but it doesn’t mean it will prevent you playing with your friends and there are usually games to join that you can play with your friends with you instead having to host games.

You can even ask in the lobby for a specific game you want to play, even private games! You may have to ask more than once sometimes though.
atWar will get more popular, means it will have more games.

If you really love atWar, you should consider buying premium. It will be worth it because I bought it myself : )

P.S. atWar is one of the best games I ever played, 10/10.

*Premium players who have bought packages such as game option package.

+3 votes     reply to comment
iom2010
iom2010 Jan 17 2013, 5:08pm replied:

Sure you have to pay to host private games*

+3 votes     reply to comment
Post a Comment
click to sign in

You are not logged in, your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) which we encourage all contributors to do.

2000 characters limit; HTML formatting and smileys are not supported - text only

Icon
atWar
Platforms
Windows, Web
Developer
ProtoBytes
Engine
Silverlight
Contact
Send Message
Official Page
Atwar-game.com
Release Date
Released Nov 29, 2012
Game Watch
Track this game
Share
Community Rating

Average

8.7

147 votes submitted.

You Say

-

Ratings closed.

Highest Rated (6 agree) 10/10

I tried many in-browser games, and this game really just takes the lead in the games I tried, there isn’t more than around 100.000 players active, so it’s pretty easy to get friends and chatting in room and in all other lobbies. The gameplay is nice and easy to learn, but like in all free2play games there is something they could have done better. In the game you mostly see a lot of games and cause of the new update you are able to play from the middle-age and all the way to the future. In AtWar…

Dec 12 2012, 4:36am by ForeverAloneAW

Style
Genre
Turn Based Strategy
Theme
War
Players
Multiplayer
Project
Indie
Boxshot
Boxshot
Twitter

Latest tweets from

It can take up to a few hours for tweets to begin appearing.

Embed Buttons

Promote atWar on your homepage or blog by selecting a button and using the embed code provided (more).

atWar atWar
atWar
Statistics
Rank
1,132 of 26,271
Last Update
1 year ago
Watchers
256 members
News
27
Reviews
40