Blog | About | Contact | Submit Mod | Join Mod DB | Site Map | Media Kit | Desura | RSS
| Poll: Would You Kill Baby Hitler? |
| Posts | ||
|---|---|---|
| Would You Kill Baby Hitler? | Post Reply | |
| Thread Options | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | |
| Dec 12 2010, 9:54pm Anchor | ||
|
This question just makes me imagine a really cute baby with a combover and toothbrush mustache. Norman Mailers Castle in the Forst is an awesome fictional retelling of Hitler's childhood, maybe a bit off-topic. |
||
| Dec 13 2010, 7:55pm Anchor | ||
|
No. I would not, for the following reasons: Pay attention in History, people. |
||
|
|
Dec 13 2010, 8:12pm Anchor | |
|
Leading your country into a war that ends up being a black stain on your country's history while making your political party synonymous with evil does not make you a good leader. Nor did he invent the Highway. Edited by: Cryrid |
||
|
|
Dec 14 2010, 9:39pm Anchor | |
|
how could you kill a baby? i'd prefer to duke it out with Teen Hitler on the cratered battlefields of World War One. --
|
||
| Dec 31 2010, 2:56pm Anchor | ||
|
No, I wouldn't. He wouldn't have done anything wrong by that point meaning I'd be killing an innocent baby. |
||
|
|
Jan 2 2011, 2:26am Anchor | |
|
frosty-theaussie wrote:how could you kill a baby? i'd prefer to duke it out with Teen Hitler on the cratered battlefields of World War One.
Wasn't he a courier? (Lawl) |
||
| Jan 2 2011, 4:44am Anchor | ||
|
hmmm yes he was actually. |
||
| Jan 2 2011, 5:45am Anchor | ||
|
|
||
| Jan 2 2011, 12:03pm Anchor | ||
|
I only would if he had already done all of that screwed up stuff. 'Cause actually, I'm a Jew |
||
| Jan 26 2011, 12:20pm Anchor | ||
|
der_uber_ower wrote:No, I wouldn't. He wouldn't have done anything wrong by that point meaning I'd be killing an innocent baby.
But you have already seen the future, he would do the his same actions again. |
||
|
|
Mar 10 2011, 2:01pm Anchor | |
|
I wouldn't kill him. I'd just try to observe his life in order to understand him more. I would either stay in the shadows or become a friend of his (yeah, a friend of a little boy). When he is an adult, I will determine for myself whether or not saving millions is worth murdering a friend since that's what I'd hope to be if not just some invisible observer. -- Xfire|-|YouTube|-|Steam|-|Wedding Song|-|The Rules |
||
| Mar 10 2011, 2:59pm Anchor | ||
|
This forums really has some productive questions lol. |
||
|
|
Mar 10 2011, 4:21pm Anchor | |
|
|
Mar 10 2011, 4:56pm Anchor | |
|
Niteshade wrote:No one is born evil
No, but some simply aren't fit for society. They're the ones who tend to end up in an asylum. -- Xfire|-|YouTube|-|Steam|-|Wedding Song|-|The Rules |
||
|
|
Mar 14 2011, 12:37pm Anchor | |
|
I dont like to think about changing the past... it brings up too many crazy topics like alternative realities and such. :P -- Controlling complexity is the essence of computer programming. --Brian Kernigan |
||
|
|
Mar 14 2011, 4:58pm Anchor | |
|
yarow12 wrote:
Niteshade wrote:No one is born evil
No, but some simply aren't fit for society. They're the ones who tend to end up in an asylum. It's true that some aren't fit for society - but who's responsibility is it to make sure that they are (or become) "fit" for our society? You can't put all that on the individual. And fyi: I don't ever want children - especially not a girl who turns into stubborn and bitchy teenager at age 13. It's the society's fault for not being able to assimilate certain individuals, and it's sometimes (more often than not) the parent's fault that a kid gets a bad uprising With that being said, I'm not claiming that everyone is born without a handicap/deficit. Someone who is born with ASPD (antisocial personality disorder) for example - which there is no cure for - will most likely not be able to live what we would "consider" a proper life. But then you will have to think about the whole field of psychiatry and about what was considered "insane" or "uncurable" a 100 years ago that doctors now have a good understanding of. The "evil" behavior of someone with ASPD (aka psychopathy) or NPD (narcissistic personality disorder) is due to neuropsychiatric diversity, i.e. they have a completely different way of trafficking around information in their brains. It's not a case of "organic damage" due to a faulty development of the fetus or anything like that. When the field of psychiatry has developed way beyond what we have today, people will look back at our period of time feeling ashamed that we threw people in jail that could've been cured if we just cared more. I'm just looking at this from a completely other perspective. Edited by: Niteshade |
||
|
|
Mar 14 2011, 5:49pm Anchor | |
|
Niteshade wrote:
yarow12 wrote:
Niteshade wrote:No one is born evil
No, but some simply aren't fit for society. They're the ones who tend to end up in an asylum. It's true that some aren't fit for society - but who's responsibility is it to make sure that they are (or become) "fit" for our society? You can't put all that on the individual. And fyi: I don't ever want children - especially not a girl who turns into stubborn and bitchy teenager at age 13. It's the society's fault for not being able to assimilate certain individuals, and it's sometimes (more often than not) the parent's fault that a kid gets a bad uprising With that being said, I'm not claiming that everyone is born without a handicap/deficit. Someone who is born with ASPD (antisocial personality disorder) for example - which there is no cure for - will most likely not be able to live what we would "consider" a proper life. But then you will have to think about the whole field of psychiatry and about what was considered "insane" or "uncurable" a 100 years ago that doctors now have a good understanding of. The "evil" behavior of someone with ASPD (aka psychopathy) or NPD (narcissistic personality disorder) is due to neuropsychiatric diversity, i.e. they have a completely different way of trafficking around information in their brains. It's not a case of "organic damage" due to a faulty development of the fetus or anything like that. When the field of psychiatry has developed way beyond what we have today, people will look back at our period of time feeling ashamed that we threw people in jail that could've been cured if we just cared more. I'm just looking at this from a completely other perspective. The responsibility goes right down the line (parents, guardians, relatives, friends, neighbors, townspeople especially if home town, nation itself). -- Xfire|-|YouTube|-|Steam|-|Wedding Song|-|The Rules |
||
|
|
Mar 14 2011, 5:59pm Anchor | |
|
yarow12 wrote: Like in Killzone, for example, the Helghast went to a distant planet and lived their lives. I haven't played the first one, but it is my understanding that they were your typical "criminals" and were outcasted somewhere, IDK. Some man rose up as a rallier and propaganda speaker and got their pride pumping. Yada yada, they have their own planet now.
Speaking of being off topic lol....... Besides by the time such advanced space travel and/or planet terraforming is possible, my guess is we'd probably already have the cures for many or all psychiatric disorders -- Controlling complexity is the essence of computer programming. --Brian Kernigan |
||
|
|
Mar 14 2011, 6:19pm Anchor | |
|
lancer611 wrote:
yarow12 wrote: Like in Killzone, for example, the Helghast went to a distant planet and lived their lives. I haven't played the first one, but it is my understanding that they were your typical "criminals" and were outcasted somewhere, IDK. Some man rose up as a rallier and propaganda speaker and got their pride pumping. Yada yada, they have their own planet now.
Speaking of being off topic lol....... Besides by the time such advanced space travel and/or planet terraforming is possible, my guess is we'd probably already have the cures for many or all psychiatric disorders Even then, we'd still have shitty parenting and mentally distressed people. The only true "cure" for all of these things would be controlling the human brain itself, thus forcing it to calculate and act like a proper civilian. Have you ever seen Equilibrium? -- Xfire|-|YouTube|-|Steam|-|Wedding Song|-|The Rules |
||
|
|
Mar 16 2011, 7:45pm Anchor | |
|
If you ever get a chance to travel trough time: Don`t ever change the history! My vote: No! -- #include "zcommon.acs" script 1 ENTER { print (s:"DEAD FiSH rules!"); } |
||
| Mar 20 2011, 1:22pm Anchor | ||
|
No germany that time did alot of great inventions. |
||
|
|
Mar 20 2011, 1:58pm Anchor | |
|
My basic rule is not to change history prior to about 1995 or so. Anything more recent is fair game. |
||
|
|
Mar 20 2011, 4:27pm Anchor | |
|
Ever since I first saw the Baby Hitler threads I immediately thought of this (go to 2:49, after the logo to the end): |
||
| Mar 26 2011, 3:45pm Anchor | ||
|
only chuck noris could go back in time and face baby hitler |
||
| Mar 26 2011, 7:40pm Anchor | ||
|
I would definatly kill Baby Hitler, I would stop on him and make him starve to death like they did to babies in those concentration camps |
||
Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.