Would You Kill Baby Hitler? Thread

people can change there destiny

Well he was an artist. But you don't have much time for art when your conquering the world

Also i strongly recommend you watching the movie max because it tells a lot about his past.

Edited by: PeterHat

Youtube.com
^would you kill that?

I would have bribed the art academy that originally rejected him, so that when he went to apply, he'd actually get in.. War avoided. He only joined the army because he got rejected from Art school- when he joined the army he became a spy, that spy infiltrated the Socialist Party.. took it over and became ruler of Germany. I've written essays on this before, that it was the entire fault of Art elitism that caused hitler to do what he did- and Art Elitism that should be the major blame for the war even occuring- if Hitler had become an accomplished artist he'd never had done the evil things he eventually did. He was very passionate about art if you read Mein Kampf, stating that his father was pissed at him because it wasn't a prestigious role in society and it wouldn't pay much, but he wanted to do it, and when denied he found an outlet via the war- and then became leader of a country based on the contacts he made during the war.

If the art industry at the time hadn't been so elitist and selective on "Who" could be an artist, then he would have lived a very forfilled life and eventually loose his hatred towards the jewish- because he'd be in a position of prosperity just as they were- and he would have no more reason to hate them- other than competition, which is healthy so long as its not racist.

And his paintings are actually really good, I'm surprised he was rejected. Instead what we see is someone fueled entirely by his hatred of everyone and everything- replacing one elitism with another, what he did was pure hypocracy and he gets no sympathy for that- he twisted his own story into one that made him out to be a patriot rather than a failed artist- he completely lied, he was a failed artist and he hated everyone in society for rejecting him- he found an outlet in violence, though at the time many would have considered this to be "heroic", though today we know it'd be "STUPID" because all it leads to is death and suffering- Hitler would eventually loose his sight temporarily during the war from gas attack- so he was stupid to take a risk simply for such an outlet. (he was not a conscript, he willingly joined.)

Gibberstein wrote:...which has been fighting on and off for as long as history has been recorded, probably longer. Thus we arrive at the optimal solution given the assumption that time travel is possible. Skip to the future, acquire some sort of nanobot-automated mass assembly gubbins, take said tech back to the neolithic era and set up the internet a few millennia early. Humanity skips straight to Lolcats, Rickrolling and Goatse, skipping armed conflict entirely. Epic win achieved

Ah, yet another person that theorizes that the internet will be the key to world peace ... I was beginning to think maybe I was wrong

I've always looked back on villains of the past and the stories and wondered if it was their fault for not being strong willed or if it was societies fault for shaping these personalities ...

Let's face it, people/society is cold, really cold. We simply care too much about ourselfves to care about others. For example, today I heard a car alarm go off in the parking lot, however I didn't even get up and look out the window to see if someone's car was being stolen because I knew it wasnt my car ... I even briefly thought "hey, someone could be in trouble ... nah, ill keep working on my homework".

This seems to be a common issue of someone seeing someone else in help, but deciding to either ignore it or let someone else handle it. Why do we condition ourselves to be like this?

I actually think about that subject quite often and realize that the only way I could possibly change society for the better is if I started taking actions to help those in need. However, I don't ... whenever I'm confronted with that opportunity  ... I chicken out ... why? Probably because we are people who's actions are easily manipulated by society. Yay behavior paradox!

Ok easy solution to stopping both WW1 and WW2, stop Wilhelm the 2nd from ever taking power and somehow make his Father live longer so that Germany can be Liberalized into a Democracy (Which would have happened if Wilhelm didn't fuck everything up.)

Liberalized Germany + Alliance with Britain == No war with Germany.

However the problems with Russia would still occur, so this solution isn't 100%. The Collapse of Russia's Monarch and the rise of Communism is something that would be difficult to fix.

Well we might have a game where you play as Lenin and trying to kill the resistance :/ Crisis Soviet edition ?

I'm afraid that in the Soviet world we mite be listening to something like this :0

To kill, or not to kill: that is the question:
Whether 'tis better in the mind to let those suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing him? To kill: to exist;
No more;

Cosmo-y enough for you?

Edited by: Assaultman67

i wonder what do you mean by that?

Wow, I thought for sure I killed this topic with my drunk post ...

Hmm ... I don't think people really were considering the actual physical capability of time travel within this hypothetical scenario ...

This is the same reason why "robot voice genious guy" (can't think of the name ... only 2 hours of sleep last night) theorizes that time travel to the past is impossible (sort of) ...

Yes ... that cyborg ...