Posts | ||
---|---|---|
quake 3 vs. unreal 2k4 | Locked | |
Thread Options | ||
Jun 27 2004 Anchor | ||
ok we are working on a mod called Fighters Unlimited... Moddb.com and we were wondering...should we make the mod based on ut2k4 or quake 3 based on compatibility...graphic(like this part is competition) features...importabilit...and the like,,,and can i please get an explanation...thank you... |
||
Jun 27 2004 Anchor | ||
ut2k4 |
||
|
Jun 27 2004 Anchor | |
Of course Quake3 is more compatible, it supports low-end video cards Nice slogan however.... "We put the F U in FUN" - Edited By CheapAlert On Sun 27th, Jun 2004 @ 6:19:10pm -- < insert subject games here >
|
||
Jun 27 2004 Anchor | ||
huh ? q3 is older and the community is filled with more crap than good. not many want to make a q3 mod anymore. dont ask why.. because i dont know. if you have a low-end vid card then upgrade. nuff said. |
||
|
Jun 27 2004 Anchor | |
well I have seen many great finished mods ut2k4, not so many for quake 3 :paranoid Although I think quake3 is prolly easier/nicer engine to work with - Edited By chis-wk On Sun 27th, Jun 2004 @ 11:46:43pm -- Nothing. |
||
|
Jun 27 2004 Anchor | |
And what about ut2k4 then? After all, he asked what's more compatible, and q3a obviously is.
What you don't know obviously doesn't count. - Edited By CheapAlert On Sun 27th, Jun 2004 @ 6:57:37pm -- < insert subject games here >
|
||
|
Jun 27 2004 Anchor | |
Go with Q3 you would probably get lost in all of ut2k4's mods (no offense) |
||
Jun 27 2004 Anchor | ||
i dont know why people dont mod q3 more. thats what i meant. ut2k4 seems to offer more and i think looks alot nicer in the end. this isnt a q3 vrs ut2k4. any excuse to argue... |
||
|
Jun 28 2004 Anchor | |
I cant believe you think I am that petty, I check all my hatered at the cosmos door. Knock it off and releax. |
||
|
Jun 28 2004 Anchor | |
Did you miss the thread title? -- < insert subject games here >
|
||
Jun 28 2004 Anchor | ||
yes, if you noticed he put this up for personal benefit of a good engine to mod. not for the two to duel between people.
wasnt talking to you. |
||
Jun 28 2004 Anchor | ||
well, the mod is probably not going to be good, since you have to ask people what game engine you should use. People shouldn't need to tell you what game engine to use, you should just decide it on your own. As hot girls say "Duh!!!!!!!". |
||
|
Jun 28 2004 Anchor | |
Klowns is a retard, don't listen to him. Anyhoo, i'd go with ut2k4, more community support, you can do stuff with it that you can't do with quake 3 etc. |
||
Jun 28 2004 Anchor | ||
lol, he actually did kind of have a point. people who ask for the primaray concepts with no experience in that field are most likely doomed to failure. sorry to say it. but klowns is right on this one. no matter how retarded he may be |
||
Jun 28 2004 Anchor | ||
ok first off you two clowns...shut up...next off thanks for all the help and i was asking to give the public some say in it/...not because we are unsure about it...we already chose we just wanted to know what the actual people who played it wanted it on.[kinda offtopic] how can you base how good a game is gonna be klowns just from someone asking a question...people ask questions to get around...or get more knowledge...nexttime please think before you type[/kinda offtopic] - Edited By krazyace On Mon 28th, Jun 2004 @ 1:15:38pm |
||
|
Jul 6 2004 Anchor | |
|
Jul 6 2004 Anchor | |
yeah, an 2k4 is made with an awesome engine and some neat skinning and mapping techniques -- ModDB Fucking Oldtimer and (ex) Crow |
Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.