Blog | About | Contact | Submit Mod | Join Mod DB | Site Map | Media Kit | Desura | RSS
| Posts | ||
|---|---|---|
| Games you regret buying | Post Reply | |
| Thread Options | 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 | |
| Dec 9 2012, 3:59pm Anchor | ||
|
The two games i regret buying for full price: Im not saying they are bad games, its just that they are not nearly as good as the reviews tried to make them, so i regret paying full price for them. |
||
|
|
Dec 9 2012, 5:57pm Anchor | |
|
If you get fooled by Bethesda to buy a game then you really are to be pittied |
||
| Dec 9 2012, 7:34pm Anchor | ||
|
For me it would have to be AC3, the campaign was rushed it wasn't as good as ACR or ACB plus they kill of Desmond witch is a shame and on top of that you play as a Templar at the start of the game and Conner gets a Mohawk mullet later in the game also Conner hardly wears the hood when you get thither into the game (I actually sat there and yelled at him to put the hood back on because come on no one wants to see that mullet >:o), the only decent thing in game was probably the boat missions they were fun but other than those missions the game was pretty disappointing ~ I just want Ezio back. R.I.P EDIT: Oh, Another thing that was weird was they combined Altair & Ezio together to make Conner so Ezio = Intelligence + Altair = Strength thus making Conner "The Super Assassin" is how they won the war that was going on in the first place, A Super Assassin. Well that's what i think anyway it's a nice theory EDIT: I'm just going to say tho that XCOM: Enemy Unknown, Was . . . Amazing !!!! Edited by: Monkey_De_Luffy |
||
|
|
Dec 10 2012, 3:54pm Anchor | |
|
Which* not witch. Witches are burned at the stake, but which witch do you burn first? -- You know who's not got Facebook or Twitter? This guy. |
||
|
|
Dec 10 2012, 5:39pm Anchor | |
|
The Witch that "witches" to be burned first? |
||
|
|
Dec 10 2012, 6:36pm Anchor | |
|
Dragonlord wrote:The Witch that "witches" to be burned first?
-- You know who's not got Facebook or Twitter? This guy. |
||
| Dec 10 2012, 8:31pm Anchor | ||
|
I'm kind of an old gamer, as in, I play games that have definitely shown their age. SO, with that out of the way, I'd say a game I regret buying was Mafia for the PS2. Being a 2002 (2004 if you count when they put it on the PS2) game, you really can't expect much, but I honestly expected a bit more. The loading takes way too long and eventually I just quit because I seriously can't take it. Right off the bat in the campaign you're thrown into some hard stuff, and don't get me wrong, I'm into a challenge, but this was absurd! I had to reload the first mission 8 times for God's sake!! Anyways the graphics were okay, but the actual gameplay was shot with bugs, from shooting through walls to walking straight to them, and my biggest pet peeve: flipping a car when you nudge the edge of a guard-rail. Anyways, also, in the free roam you don't get the full experience. They take out the cops and replace them with just Morello's boys, so that dumbs down the playing a bit, and the freeplay gets repetitive. Oh, another game that I regret buying was Heroes of Might and Magic III. Now I know I'm gonna get chewed out by fans for this up and coming rant, but I mean, it doesn't live up to the spectacle people make it out to be. Gameplay: Good, not great. Graphics: Great for the time. However, I have a problem with how dramatically the game changes from campaign to single scenario. In the campaign almost every move you make is detailed with ellaborate descriptions and biographies and such, as well as awesome cutscene animations. Either they made too many scenarios or got lazy, but the single scenarios have none of those above qualities, no ellaborate descriptions or cool cutscenes. Just....just....blah for lack of a better term. That's just me though, as I prefer Heroes V and soon to be VI |
||
|
|
Dec 10 2012, 10:53pm Anchor | |
|
chaz625 wrote:I'm kind of an old gamer, as in, I play games that have definitely shown their age. SO, with that out of the way, I'd say a game I regret buying was Mafia for the PS2. Being a 2002 (2004 if you count when they put it on the PS2) game, you really can't expect much, but I honestly expected a bit more. The loading takes way too long and eventually I just quit because I seriously can't take it. Right off the bat in the campaign you're thrown into some hard stuff, and don't get me wrong, I'm into a challenge, but this was absurd! I had to reload the first mission 8 times for God's sake!! Anyways the graphics were okay, but the actual gameplay was shot with bugs, from shooting through walls to walking straight to them, and my biggest pet peeve: flipping a car when you nudge the edge of a guard-rail. Anyways, also, in the free roam you don't get the full experience. They take out the cops and replace them with just Morello's boys, so that dumbs down the playing a bit, and the freeplay gets repetitive.
Oh, another game that I regret buying was Heroes of Might and Magic III. Now I know I'm gonna get chewed out by fans for this up and coming rant, but I mean, it doesn't live up to the spectacle people make it out to be. Gameplay: Good, not great. Graphics: Great for the time. However, I have a problem with how dramatically the game changes from campaign to single scenario. In the campaign almost every move you make is detailed with ellaborate descriptions and biographies and such, as well as awesome cutscene animations. Either they made too many scenarios or got lazy, but the single scenarios have none of those above qualities, no ellaborate descriptions or cool cutscenes. Just....just....blah for lack of a better term. That's just me though, as I prefer Heroes V and soon to be VI I never played the original Mafia, but Mafia II fixes pretty much all of the problems you're stating. Plus it has a far more natural and story-centric progression curve. The only thing still lacking is a large number of things to do besides goofing around in the sandbox. Granted, that is all I ever really wanted to do in Red Dead Redemption, so maybe Mafia II's devs were thinking ahead. -- You know who's not got Facebook or Twitter? This guy. |
||
| Dec 11 2012, 4:28am Anchor | ||
|
Might & Magic IX, bought at full price. Good Lord in Heaven, it still hurts to think how bad that game was, especially because I was (and still am) a huge fan of the series. Edited by: Deanor |
||
| Dec 11 2012, 7:07am Anchor | ||
|
Reqieumthefallen wrote:Which* not witch.
Witches are burned at the stake, but which witch do you burn first? haha my bad |
||
| Dec 13 2012, 2:43am Anchor | ||
|
A lot of modern games don't need a full price sell. I just wait until i can found them at low price on e-bay or in the game shop. |
||
| Dec 13 2012, 4:07pm Anchor | ||
|
Darksiders I A really cool concept that is hindered by sometimes near-sluggish rendering (ps3), repetitive gameplay and bland dungeons in a universe that makes just about as much sense as "The Mighty Boosh". Now, I may just dust off the disc to continue my adventure as the apocalyptic rider War, but at this point I see no real reason to. It lacks the spark that normally keeps me driven enough to play through a meaty game. In short: Darksiders appears trying to be a beat-em up, a roleplaying game and the next Legend of Zelda all at the same time. It gets messy. |
||
| Dec 13 2012, 5:14pm Anchor | ||
|
Call of Juarez: The Cartel Assumed it was freeplay - sandbox. I found it had a lack of depth and didn't find it that fun. |
||
|
|
Dec 13 2012, 5:58pm Anchor | |
|
Nukensura wrote:Call of Juarez: The Cartel
Assumed it was freeplay - sandbox. I found it had a lack of depth and didn't find it that fun. And it's also got all of these issues too: Extra-credits.net -- You know who's not got Facebook or Twitter? This guy. |
||
| Dec 13 2012, 6:02pm Anchor | ||
|
One of the old PS1 Spec Ops games. I forgot the title (I think it was Ranger Elite?) Dreadful controls, poor camera, wonky analog support, and more. It had an interesting mechanic wherein dying didn't end the level but incapacitated the soldier who was defeated (if you were playing co-op) and damage takes two missions or more to recover, so there may be a chance that all of your guys are haggard and you just have to suck it up and choose the least beat-up guy to take. But it was all so generic and ugly (even for a PS1 game) that I actually got kind of depressed playing it. Honestly. |
||
|
|
Dec 14 2012, 12:28pm Anchor | |
|
NoyemiK wrote:One of the old PS1 Spec Ops games. I forgot the title (I think it was Ranger Elite?)
Dreadful controls, poor camera, wonky analog support, and more. It had an interesting mechanic wherein dying didn't end the level but incapacitated the soldier who was defeated (if you were playing co-op) and damage takes two missions or more to recover, so there may be a chance that all of your guys are haggard and you just have to suck it up and choose the least beat-up guy to take. But it was all so generic and ugly (even for a PS1 game) that I actually got kind of depressed playing it. Honestly. The latest Spec Ops entry, The Line, fixes pretty much all of those problems. It was made by a different developer, and it has a solid control scheme. It even got a patch a few months back that re-included co-op missions to go along with it's stealth/tactics centric multiplayer and it's solid singleplayer campaign (which has some of the best writing I've seen in the industry). -- You know who's not got Facebook or Twitter? This guy. |
||
| Feb 2 2013, 11:16am Anchor | ||
|
FF7, repeatedly years ago, when I could have just downloaded it for "free" present day! I actually tried to play it again lately, but I didn't get to finish it for some reason... |
||
| Feb 8 2013, 11:17pm Anchor | ||
|
I don't regret buying ANY game! I figure if I was that stupid,I had it coming.But I've been very lucky so far....... |
||
| Feb 8 2013, 11:45pm Anchor | ||
|
As a child, probably Worms 3D. It had brilliant premise, but imo, came out at the wrong time. From more recent years has to be without doubt Tom Clancy Endwar, got caught up in the hype unfortunately. I tried playing it over and over thinking it was just me that somewhere there was a diamond waiting to be found, but nope.. |
||
|
|
Feb 16 2013, 9:02am Anchor | |
|
Guild wars 2. Cons. Pros Duesx Inv War Cons Pros |
||
| Feb 17 2013, 5:21am Anchor | ||
|
Call Of Duty. |
||
| Feb 17 2013, 2:42pm Anchor | ||
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare |
||
| Feb 24 2013, 12:27pm Anchor | ||
|
War On Terror -- "motus domesticus vulgaris vita est versus homo novus" |
||
| Mar 1 2013, 3:34am Anchor | ||
|
For tossing money down the drain I think Orcs vs Men is going to rank highest on my list in recent years. Any of the others I've disliked were all part of bundle deals and I was more than happy with the majority of it so won't consider the money a waste. |
||
| Mar 3 2013, 4:08pm Anchor | ||
|
All the games i regret purchasing (for full price at least) were preorders: Miner Wars 2081: A drm monster with disappointing gameplay and the least intuitive default gamepad controls i ever saw kaboro wrote:
Dishonored- Lazy developed game with small arenas cleverly disguised as "free-roaming" levels, lack of graphic diversity, no music score. (was fooled by the Bethesda brand that mostly published A++ titles before) |
||
Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.